Leung Brenda, Lauche Romy, Leach Matthew, Zhang Yan, Cramer Holger, Sibbritt David
1 Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Canada.
2 Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine (ARCCIM), University of Technology Sydney, Australia.
Nutr Health. 2018 Mar;24(1):11-18. doi: 10.1177/0260106017732719. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
Special diets are frequently used by the public but reasons for use and characteristics of users remain unclear.
To determine prevalence of the use of special diets, the individual characteristics associated with their use and reasons for use.
The secondary analysis used data from the 2012 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), a cross-sectional household interview survey of a nationally representative sample of non-hospitalized US adult populations ( n = 34,525). The dependent variables in this secondary analysis were the use of a special diet (vegetarian, macrobiotic, Atkins, Pritikin, and Ornish) ever and during the past 12 months. Independent variables included sociodemographic, clinical and behavioral variables. Prevalence of special diet use and reasons for use were analyzed descriptively. Associations between independent and dependent variables were analyzed using Chi-square tests and logistic regression. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.
Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of using special diets were 7.5% (weighted n = 17.7 million) and 2.9% (weighted n = 6.9 million), respectively. Individuals using special diets in the past 12 months were more likely female (OR = 1.45; 95% CI = 1.21-1.74), not married (OR = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.63-0.91), college-educated (OR = 1.98; 95% CI = 1.25-3.11) and depressed (OR = 1.50; 95% CI = 1.14-1.98). They more likely also used herbal products (OR = 2.35; 95%CI = 1.84-2.99), non-vitamin (OR = 1.82; 95% CI = 1.45-2.27) and vitamin supplements (OR = 1.57; 95% CI = 1.24-1.99). Diets were mainly used to improve overall health (76.7%) or for general wellness/prevention (70.4%).
Special diets are mainly used for unspecific health reasons by those who are females, have a college degree or with depression, and commonly used in conjunction with herbs and dietary supplements.
特殊饮食在公众中经常被采用,但采用的原因及使用者的特征仍不明确。
确定特殊饮食的使用流行率、与使用相关的个体特征及使用原因。
二次分析使用了2012年美国国家健康访谈调查(NHIS)的数据,这是一项对具有全国代表性的非住院美国成年人群样本(n = 34,525)进行的横断面家庭访谈调查。本次二次分析中的因变量是曾经及过去12个月内使用特殊饮食(素食、生机饮食、阿特金斯饮食、普里蒂金饮食和奥尼什饮食)的情况。自变量包括社会人口学、临床和行为变量。对特殊饮食使用的流行率及使用原因进行描述性分析。使用卡方检验和逻辑回归分析自变量与因变量之间的关联。计算优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。
终身及12个月使用特殊饮食的流行率分别为7.5%(加权n = 1770万)和2.9%(加权n = 690万)。在过去12个月内使用特殊饮食的个体更可能为女性(OR = 1.45;95%CI = 1.21 - 1.74)、未婚(OR = 0.76;95%CI = 0.63 - 0.91)、受过大学教育(OR = 1.98;95%CI = 1.25 - 3.11)且患有抑郁症(OR = 1.50;95%CI = 1.14 - 1.98)。他们也更可能使用草药产品(OR = 2.35;95%CI = 1.84 - 2.99)、非维生素补充剂(OR = 1.82;95%CI = 1.45 - 2.27)和维生素补充剂(OR = 1.57;95%CI = 1.24 - 1.99)。饮食主要用于改善整体健康(76.7%)或促进一般健康/预防疾病(70.4%)。
特殊饮食主要被女性、拥有大学学位者或患有抑郁症者出于非特定的健康原因使用,并且通常与草药和膳食补充剂一起使用。