Health Promotion and Health Behavior Program, College of Health, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Linus Pauling Institute, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
J Health Popul Nutr. 2023 Nov 23;42(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s41043-023-00460-9.
The popularity of vegetarian diets has increased the need for studies on long-term health outcomes. A limited number of studies, including only one study from a non-vegetarian population, investigated the risk of mortality with self-identified vegetarianism and reported inconsistent results. This study evaluated prospective associations between vegetarian diets and all-cause mortality among 117,673 participants from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial cohort study. Vegetarian diet status was self-identified on the questionnaire. Deaths were ascertained from follow-up questionnaires and the National Death Index database. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to estimate the risk of all-cause mortality in hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). By diet group, there were 116,894 omnivores (whose diet does not exclude animal products), 329 lacto- and/or ovo-vegetarians (whose diet excludes meat, but includes dairy and/or eggs), 310 pesco-vegetarians (whose diet excludes meat except for fish and seafood) and 140 vegans (whose diet excludes all animal products). After an average follow-up of 18 years, 39,763 participants were deceased. The risk of all-cause mortality did not statistically significantly differ among the four diet groups. Comparing with the omnivore group, the HR (95% CI) were 0.81 (0.64-1.03) for pesco-vegetarian group, 0.99 (0.80-1.22) for lacto- and/or ovo-vegetarian group and 1.27 (0.99-1.63) for vegan group, respectively. Similarly, mortality risk did not differ when comparing lacto- and/or ovo-vegetarians plus vegans with meat/fish eaters (omnivores and pesco-vegetarians) (HR [95% CI] = 1.09 [0.93-1.28]). As this study is one of the two studies of vegetarianism and mortality in non-vegetarian populations, further investigation is warranted.
素食饮食的流行增加了对长期健康结果的研究需求。包括一项来自非素食人群的研究在内的少数研究调查了自我认定的素食主义与死亡率之间的风险,报告结果不一致。本研究评估了 117673 名来自前列腺癌、肺癌、结直肠癌和卵巢癌筛查试验队列研究参与者的素食饮食与全因死亡率之间的前瞻性关联。素食饮食状况在问卷中自我认定。通过随访问卷和国家死亡指数数据库确定死亡。多变量 Cox 回归模型用于估计全因死亡率的风险比 (HR) 和 95%置信区间 (CI)。按饮食组划分,有 116894 名杂食者(其饮食不排除动物产品)、329 名乳蛋素食者(其饮食不包括肉,但包括奶制品和/或蛋类)、310 名鱼素素食者(其饮食不包括肉,除了鱼和海鲜)和 140 名严格素食者(其饮食不包括所有动物产品)。在平均 18 年的随访后,39763 名参与者死亡。四个饮食组之间的全因死亡率没有统计学显著差异。与杂食组相比,鱼素素食组的 HR(95%CI)分别为 0.81(0.64-1.03)、乳蛋素食组为 0.99(0.80-1.22)、严格素食组为 1.27(0.99-1.63)。同样,当将乳蛋素食者和严格素食者与肉食/鱼类食用者(杂食者和鱼素素食者)进行比较时,死亡率风险也没有差异(HR[95%CI] = 1.09[0.93-1.28])。由于本研究是两项非素食人群中的素食与死亡率研究之一,因此需要进一步调查。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2023-11-23
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2011-10-7
JAMA Intern Med. 2013-7-8
Lipids Health Dis. 2024-10-26
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012-11-20
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2022-10-20
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2019-6
Am J Clin Nutr. 2016-1
JAMA Intern Med. 2013-7-8
Am J Epidemiol. 2010-12-6