文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

研究者与作者简介:机遇、优势与局限

Researcher and Author Profiles: Opportunities, Advantages, and Limitations.

作者信息

Gasparyan Armen Yuri, Nurmashev Bekaidar, Yessirkepov Marlen, Endovitskiy Dmitry A, Voronov Alexander A, Kitas George D

机构信息

Departments of Rheumatology and Research and Development, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust (Teaching Trust of the University of Birmingham, UK), Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, West Midlands, UK.

South Kazakhstan State Pharmaceutical Academy, Shymkent, Kazakhstan.

出版信息

J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Nov;32(11):1749-1756. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.11.1749.


DOI:10.3346/jkms.2017.32.11.1749
PMID:28960025
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5639053/
Abstract

Currently available online profiling platforms offer various services for researchers and authors. Opening an individual account and filling it with scholarly contents increase visibility of research output and boost its impact. This article overviews some of the widely used and emerging profiling platforms, highlighting their tools for sharing scholarly items, crediting individuals, and facilitating networking. Global bibliographic databases and search platforms, such as Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar, are widely used for profiling authors with indexed publications. Scholarly networking websites, such as ResearchGate and Academia.edu, provide indispensable services for researchers poorly visible elsewhere on the Internet. Several specialized platforms are designed to offer profiling along with their main functionalities, such as reference management and archiving. The Open Researcher and Contributor Identification (ORCID) project has offered a solution to the author name disambiguation. It has been integrated with numerous bibliographic databases, platforms, and manuscript submission systems to help research managers and journal editors select and credit the best reviewers, and other scholarly contributors. Individuals with verifiable reviewer and editorial accomplishments are also covered by Publons, which is an increasingly recognized service for publicizing and awarding reviewer comments. Currently available profiling formats have numerous advantages and some limitations. The advantages are related to their openness and chances of boosting the researcher impact. Some of the profiling websites are complementary to each other. The underutilization of various profiling websites and their inappropriate uses for promotion of 'predatory' journals are among reported limitations. A combined approach to the profiling systems is advocated in this article.

摘要

目前可用的在线简介平台为研究人员和作者提供了各种服务。开设个人账户并填充学术内容可提高研究成果的可见性并增强其影响力。本文概述了一些广泛使用和新兴的简介平台,重点介绍了它们用于分享学术成果、认可个人以及促进社交网络的工具。全球书目数据库和搜索平台,如Scopus、Web of Science、PubMed和谷歌学术,广泛用于对有索引出版物的作者进行简介。学术社交网站,如ResearchGate和Academia.edu,为在互联网其他地方知名度较低的研究人员提供了不可或缺的服务。几个专门平台在提供其主要功能(如参考文献管理和存档)的同时,还提供简介服务。开放研究者与贡献者识别(ORCID)项目为作者姓名歧义问题提供了解决方案。它已与众多书目数据库、平台和稿件提交系统集成,以帮助研究管理人员和期刊编辑选择并认可最佳审稿人和其他学术贡献者。具有可核实审稿和编辑成就的个人也被Publons涵盖,Publons是一项日益受到认可的用于宣传和奖励审稿意见的服务。目前可用的简介形式有许多优点,但也存在一些局限性。优点与它们的开放性以及提高研究人员影响力的机会有关。一些简介网站相互补充。各种简介网站利用不足以及它们被不当用于推广“掠夺性”期刊是报告的局限性之一。本文提倡对简介系统采用综合方法。

相似文献

[1]
Researcher and Author Profiles: Opportunities, Advantages, and Limitations.

J Korean Med Sci. 2017-11

[2]
Systematic and open identification of researchers and authors: focus on open researcher and contributor ID.

J Korean Med Sci. 2014-11

[3]
Specialist Bibliographic Databases.

J Korean Med Sci. 2016-5

[4]
Online platforms and social networks for the creation of research profiles.

Farm Hosp. 2020-1-1

[5]
Comprehensive Approach to Open Access Publishing: Platforms and Tools.

J Korean Med Sci. 2019-7-15

[6]
Open Researcher and Contributor Identifier and other author identifiers: Perspective from Pakistan.

J Pak Med Assoc. 2019-6

[7]
Researcher and Author Impact Metrics: Variety, Value, and Context.

J Korean Med Sci. 2018-4-18

[8]
Scientific author names: errors, corrections, and identity profiles.

Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2016

[9]
Information sources for obesity prevention policy research: a review of systematic reviews.

Syst Rev. 2017-8-8

[10]
Adopting ORCID as a unique identifier will benefit all involved in scholarly communication.

Natl Med J India. 2016

引用本文的文献

[1]
The Peer Review Process: Past, Present, and Future.

Br J Biomed Sci. 2024

[2]
A comprehensive scan of psychological disciplines through self-identification on Google Scholar: Relative endorsement, topical coverage, and publication patterns.

PLoS One. 2024

[3]
Feeding ecology of the Terciopelo pit viper snake () in Ecuador.

PeerJ. 2023

[4]
Online presence of biomedical researchers: Where to maintain a profile?

Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022-4

[5]
Predatory Journals and Publishers - Dilemmas: How to Assess it and How to Avoid it?

Med Arch. 2021-10

[6]
Peer Reviewers in Central Asia: Publons Based Analysis.

J Korean Med Sci. 2021-6-28

[7]
Scientific authorship: a primer for researchers.

Reumatologia. 2020

[8]
Moving towards online rheumatology education in the era of COVID-19.

Clin Rheumatol. 2020-9-17

[9]
SPI-Hub™: a gateway to scholarly publishing information.

J Med Libr Assoc. 2020-4

[10]
Steps towards quality of open access publishing.

Mediterr J Rheumatol. 2018-12-18

本文引用的文献

[1]
Analysing researchers' outreach efforts and the association with publication metrics: A case study of Kudos.

PLoS One. 2017-8-17

[2]
Normalizing Google Scholar data for use in research evaluation.

Scientometrics. 2017

[3]
Level of Awareness and Knowledge of Breast Cancer in Nigeria. A Systematic Review.

Ethiop J Health Sci. 2017-3

[4]
Retractions: Stamp out fake peer review.

Nature. 2017-5-31

[5]
Introducing ORCID.

Science. 2017-5-19

[6]
Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison.

BMC Med. 2017-3-16

[7]
Self-medication practice in Ethiopia: a systematic review.

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017-3-1

[8]
What are the personal and professional characteristics that distinguish the researchers who publish in high- and low-impact journals? A multi-national web-based survey.

Ecancermedicalscience. 2017-2-7

[9]
Rewarding peer-review work: the Publons initiative.

Andrology. 2016-11

[10]
Adopting ORCID as a unique identifier will benefit all involved in scholarly communication.

Natl Med J India. 2016

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索