Gasparyan Armen Yuri, Nurmashev Bekaidar, Yessirkepov Marlen, Endovitskiy Dmitry A, Voronov Alexander A, Kitas George D
Departments of Rheumatology and Research and Development, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust (Teaching Trust of the University of Birmingham, UK), Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, West Midlands, UK.
South Kazakhstan State Pharmaceutical Academy, Shymkent, Kazakhstan.
J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Nov;32(11):1749-1756. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.11.1749.
Currently available online profiling platforms offer various services for researchers and authors. Opening an individual account and filling it with scholarly contents increase visibility of research output and boost its impact. This article overviews some of the widely used and emerging profiling platforms, highlighting their tools for sharing scholarly items, crediting individuals, and facilitating networking. Global bibliographic databases and search platforms, such as Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar, are widely used for profiling authors with indexed publications. Scholarly networking websites, such as ResearchGate and Academia.edu, provide indispensable services for researchers poorly visible elsewhere on the Internet. Several specialized platforms are designed to offer profiling along with their main functionalities, such as reference management and archiving. The Open Researcher and Contributor Identification (ORCID) project has offered a solution to the author name disambiguation. It has been integrated with numerous bibliographic databases, platforms, and manuscript submission systems to help research managers and journal editors select and credit the best reviewers, and other scholarly contributors. Individuals with verifiable reviewer and editorial accomplishments are also covered by Publons, which is an increasingly recognized service for publicizing and awarding reviewer comments. Currently available profiling formats have numerous advantages and some limitations. The advantages are related to their openness and chances of boosting the researcher impact. Some of the profiling websites are complementary to each other. The underutilization of various profiling websites and their inappropriate uses for promotion of 'predatory' journals are among reported limitations. A combined approach to the profiling systems is advocated in this article.
目前可用的在线简介平台为研究人员和作者提供了各种服务。开设个人账户并填充学术内容可提高研究成果的可见性并增强其影响力。本文概述了一些广泛使用和新兴的简介平台,重点介绍了它们用于分享学术成果、认可个人以及促进社交网络的工具。全球书目数据库和搜索平台,如Scopus、Web of Science、PubMed和谷歌学术,广泛用于对有索引出版物的作者进行简介。学术社交网站,如ResearchGate和Academia.edu,为在互联网其他地方知名度较低的研究人员提供了不可或缺的服务。几个专门平台在提供其主要功能(如参考文献管理和存档)的同时,还提供简介服务。开放研究者与贡献者识别(ORCID)项目为作者姓名歧义问题提供了解决方案。它已与众多书目数据库、平台和稿件提交系统集成,以帮助研究管理人员和期刊编辑选择并认可最佳审稿人和其他学术贡献者。具有可核实审稿和编辑成就的个人也被Publons涵盖,Publons是一项日益受到认可的用于宣传和奖励审稿意见的服务。目前可用的简介形式有许多优点,但也存在一些局限性。优点与它们的开放性以及提高研究人员影响力的机会有关。一些简介网站相互补充。各种简介网站利用不足以及它们被不当用于推广“掠夺性”期刊是报告的局限性之一。本文提倡对简介系统采用综合方法。
J Korean Med Sci. 2017-11
J Korean Med Sci. 2016-5
Farm Hosp. 2020-1-1
J Korean Med Sci. 2019-7-15
J Korean Med Sci. 2018-4-18
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2016
Br J Biomed Sci. 2024
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022-4
J Korean Med Sci. 2021-6-28
Reumatologia. 2020
Clin Rheumatol. 2020-9-17
J Med Libr Assoc. 2020-4
Mediterr J Rheumatol. 2018-12-18
Scientometrics. 2017
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2017-3
Nature. 2017-5-31
Science. 2017-5-19
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017-3-1
Andrology. 2016-11