文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

专业书目数据库。

Specialist Bibliographic Databases.

作者信息

Gasparyan Armen Yuri, Yessirkepov Marlen, Voronov Alexander A, Trukhachev Vladimir I, Kostyukova Elena I, Gerasimov Alexey N, Kitas George D

机构信息

Departments of Rheumatology and Research and Development, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust (Teaching Trust of the University of Birmingham, UK), Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, West Midlands, UK .

Department of Biochemistry, Biology and Microbiology, South Kazakhstan State Pharmaceutical Academy, Shymkent, Kazakhstan.

出版信息

J Korean Med Sci. 2016 May;31(5):660-73. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.5.660. Epub 2016 Feb 23.


DOI:10.3346/jkms.2016.31.5.660
PMID:27134485
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4835589/
Abstract

Specialist bibliographic databases offer essential online tools for researchers and authors who work on specific subjects and perform comprehensive and systematic syntheses of evidence. This article presents examples of the established specialist databases, which may be of interest to those engaged in multidisciplinary science communication. Access to most specialist databases is through subscription schemes and membership in professional associations. Several aggregators of information and database vendors, such as EBSCOhost and ProQuest, facilitate advanced searches supported by specialist keyword thesauri. Searches of items through specialist databases are complementary to those through multidisciplinary research platforms, such as PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Familiarizing with the functional characteristics of biomedical and nonbiomedical bibliographic search tools is mandatory for researchers, authors, editors, and publishers. The database users are offered updates of the indexed journal lists, abstracts, author profiles, and links to other metadata. Editors and publishers may find particularly useful source selection criteria and apply for coverage of their peer-reviewed journals and grey literature sources. These criteria are aimed at accepting relevant sources with established editorial policies and quality controls.

摘要

专业书目数据库为从事特定学科研究并对证据进行全面系统综合分析的研究人员和作者提供了重要的在线工具。本文列举了一些已建立的专业数据库实例,从事多学科科学传播的人员可能会对此感兴趣。访问大多数专业数据库需要通过订阅计划和成为专业协会的会员。一些信息聚合商和数据库供应商,如EBSCOhost和ProQuest,借助专业关键词词库来促进高级搜索。通过专业数据库搜索条目与通过多学科研究平台(如PubMed、科学网和谷歌学术)进行的搜索互为补充。研究人员、作者、编辑和出版商必须熟悉生物医学和非生物医学书目检索工具的功能特点。数据库用户可以获取索引期刊列表、摘要、作者简介以及其他元数据链接的更新信息。编辑和出版商可能会发现特别有用的来源选择标准,并申请将其同行评审期刊和灰色文献来源纳入其中。这些标准旨在收录具有既定编辑政策和质量控制的相关来源。

相似文献

[1]
Specialist Bibliographic Databases.

J Korean Med Sci. 2016-5

[2]
Getting to know journal bibliographic databases.

Singapore Med J. 2010-10

[3]
Predatory Publishing Is a Threat to Non-Mainstream Science.

J Korean Med Sci. 2017-5

[4]
[Database indexing of health science journals from the German-speaking area: A journal analysis].

Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2020-4

[5]
Researcher and Author Profiles: Opportunities, Advantages, and Limitations.

J Korean Med Sci. 2017-11

[6]
Information sources for obesity prevention policy research: a review of systematic reviews.

Syst Rev. 2017-8-8

[7]
A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals.

BMC Med. 2016-2-2

[8]
Reference accuracy: authors', reviewers', editors', and publishers' contributions.

J Korean Med Sci. 2014-12

[9]
Citation searches are more sensitive than keyword searches to identify studies using specific measurement instruments.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2015-4

[10]
Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources.

Res Synth Methods. 2020-1-28

引用本文的文献

[1]
CAse-BAsed REview sTandards (CABARET): Considerations for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors.

J Korean Med Sci. 2024-8-5

[2]
An analysis of reporting practices in the top 100 cited health and medicine-related bibliometric studies from 2019 to 2021 based on a proposed guidelines.

Heliyon. 2023-5-27

[3]
Highly cited papers in Takayasu arteritis on Web of Science and Scopus: cross-sectional analysis.

Clin Rheumatol. 2022-1

[4]
Open Access Publishing in India: Coverage, Relevance, and Future Perspectives.

J Korean Med Sci. 2019-7-15

[5]
Critical Thinking and Scientific Writing Skills of Non-Anglophone Medical Students: a Model of Training Course.

J Korean Med Sci. 2019-1-4

本文引用的文献

[1]
Systematic review of universal resilience interventions targeting child and adolescent mental health in the school setting: review protocol.

Syst Rev. 2015-12-29

[2]
Inclusion of children with developmental disabilities in Arab countries: A review of the research literature from 1990 to 2014.

Res Dev Disabil. 2016

[3]
Preserving the Integrity of Citations and References by All Stakeholders of Science Communication.

J Korean Med Sci. 2015-11

[4]
Database choices in endocrine systematic reviews.

J Med Libr Assoc. 2015-10

[5]
Systematic Review of Inspiratory Muscle Training After Cerebrovascular Accident.

Respir Care. 2015-11

[6]
The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching.

PLoS One. 2015-9-17

[7]
Virtual reality training for improving the skills needed for performing surgery of the ear, nose or throat.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-9-9

[8]
AGRIS: providing access to agricultural research data exploiting open data on the web.

F1000Res. 2015-5-8

[9]
The prevalence, impact and management of musculoskeletal disorders in older people living in care homes: a systematic review.

Rheumatol Int. 2016-1

[10]
Publishing Ethics and Predatory Practices: A Dilemma for All Stakeholders of Science Communication.

J Korean Med Sci. 2015-8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索