• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Specialist Bibliographic Databases.专业书目数据库。
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 May;31(5):660-73. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.5.660. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
2
Getting to know journal bibliographic databases.了解期刊书目数据库。
Singapore Med J. 2010 Oct;51(10):757-60; quiz 761.
3
Predatory Publishing Is a Threat to Non-Mainstream Science.掠夺性出版对非主流科学构成威胁。
J Korean Med Sci. 2017 May;32(5):713-717. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.5.713.
4
[Database indexing of health science journals from the German-speaking area: A journal analysis].[德语区健康科学期刊的数据库索引:期刊分析]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2020 Apr;150-152:20-28. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2020.04.003. Epub 2020 May 19.
5
Researcher and Author Profiles: Opportunities, Advantages, and Limitations.研究者与作者简介:机遇、优势与局限
J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Nov;32(11):1749-1756. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.11.1749.
6
Information sources for obesity prevention policy research: a review of systematic reviews.肥胖预防政策研究的信息来源:系统评价综述。
Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 8;6(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0543-2.
7
A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals.生物医学期刊科学编辑能力的范围综述。
BMC Med. 2016 Feb 2;14:16. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0561-2.
8
Reference accuracy: authors', reviewers', editors', and publishers' contributions.参考文献准确性:作者、审稿人、编辑和出版商的贡献。
J Korean Med Sci. 2014 Dec;29(12):1587-9. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.12.1587. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
9
Citation searches are more sensitive than keyword searches to identify studies using specific measurement instruments.在识别使用特定测量工具的研究方面,引文检索比关键词检索更敏感。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;68(4):412-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
10
Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources.哪些学术搜索系统适用于系统评价或荟萃分析?评估 Google Scholar、PubMed 和其他 26 个资源的检索质量。
Res Synth Methods. 2020 Mar;11(2):181-217. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1378. Epub 2020 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
CAse-BAsed REview sTandards (CABARET): Considerations for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors.基于案例的审查标准 (CABARET):作者、审查者和编辑的考虑因素。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Aug 5;39(30):e225. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e225.
2
An analysis of reporting practices in the top 100 cited health and medicine-related bibliometric studies from 2019 to 2021 based on a proposed guidelines.基于一项拟议指南,对2019年至2021年被引用次数最多的100项健康与医学相关文献计量学研究的报告做法进行分析。
Heliyon. 2023 May 27;9(6):e16780. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16780. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Highly cited papers in Takayasu arteritis on Web of Science and Scopus: cross-sectional analysis.科学网和Scopus上关于大动脉炎的高被引论文:横断面分析。
Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Jan;41(1):129-135. doi: 10.1007/s10067-021-05901-6. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
4
Open Access Publishing in India: Coverage, Relevance, and Future Perspectives.印度开放获取出版:覆盖范围、相关性和未来展望。
J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Jul 15;34(27):e180. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e180.
5
Critical Thinking and Scientific Writing Skills of Non-Anglophone Medical Students: a Model of Training Course.非英语医学专业学生的批判性思维和科研写作技能:培训课程模式。
J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Jan 4;34(3):e18. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e18. eCollection 2019 Jan 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review of universal resilience interventions targeting child and adolescent mental health in the school setting: review protocol.针对学校环境中儿童和青少年心理健康的通用复原力干预措施的系统评价:综述方案
Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 29;4:186. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0172-6.
2
Inclusion of children with developmental disabilities in Arab countries: A review of the research literature from 1990 to 2014.阿拉伯国家发育障碍儿童的纳入情况:1990年至2014年研究文献综述
Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Feb-Mar;49-50:60-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.11.005. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
3
Preserving the Integrity of Citations and References by All Stakeholders of Science Communication.科学传播的所有利益相关者维护引文和参考文献的完整性。
J Korean Med Sci. 2015 Nov;30(11):1545-52. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.11.1545. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
4
Database choices in endocrine systematic reviews.内分泌系统评价中的数据库选择
J Med Libr Assoc. 2015 Oct;103(4):189-92. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.103.4.005.
5
Systematic Review of Inspiratory Muscle Training After Cerebrovascular Accident.脑血管意外后吸气肌训练的系统评价
Respir Care. 2015 Nov;60(11):1652-9. doi: 10.4187/respcare.03981.
6
The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching.谷歌学术在循证综述中的作用及其在灰色文献检索中的适用性。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 17;10(9):e0138237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138237. eCollection 2015.
7
Virtual reality training for improving the skills needed for performing surgery of the ear, nose or throat.虚拟现实训练以提高耳鼻喉科手术所需技能。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 9;2015(9):CD010198. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010198.pub2.
8
AGRIS: providing access to agricultural research data exploiting open data on the web.AGRIS:利用网络上的开放数据提供农业研究数据访问服务。
F1000Res. 2015 May 8;4:110. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.6354.1. eCollection 2015.
9
The prevalence, impact and management of musculoskeletal disorders in older people living in care homes: a systematic review.养老院老年人肌肉骨骼疾病的患病率、影响及管理:一项系统综述
Rheumatol Int. 2016 Jan;36(1):55-64. doi: 10.1007/s00296-015-3322-1. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
10
Publishing Ethics and Predatory Practices: A Dilemma for All Stakeholders of Science Communication.出版伦理与掠夺性做法:科学传播所有利益相关者面临的困境。
J Korean Med Sci. 2015 Aug;30(8):1010-6. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.8.1010. Epub 2015 Jul 15.

专业书目数据库。

Specialist Bibliographic Databases.

作者信息

Gasparyan Armen Yuri, Yessirkepov Marlen, Voronov Alexander A, Trukhachev Vladimir I, Kostyukova Elena I, Gerasimov Alexey N, Kitas George D

机构信息

Departments of Rheumatology and Research and Development, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust (Teaching Trust of the University of Birmingham, UK), Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, West Midlands, UK .

Department of Biochemistry, Biology and Microbiology, South Kazakhstan State Pharmaceutical Academy, Shymkent, Kazakhstan.

出版信息

J Korean Med Sci. 2016 May;31(5):660-73. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.5.660. Epub 2016 Feb 23.

DOI:10.3346/jkms.2016.31.5.660
PMID:27134485
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4835589/
Abstract

Specialist bibliographic databases offer essential online tools for researchers and authors who work on specific subjects and perform comprehensive and systematic syntheses of evidence. This article presents examples of the established specialist databases, which may be of interest to those engaged in multidisciplinary science communication. Access to most specialist databases is through subscription schemes and membership in professional associations. Several aggregators of information and database vendors, such as EBSCOhost and ProQuest, facilitate advanced searches supported by specialist keyword thesauri. Searches of items through specialist databases are complementary to those through multidisciplinary research platforms, such as PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Familiarizing with the functional characteristics of biomedical and nonbiomedical bibliographic search tools is mandatory for researchers, authors, editors, and publishers. The database users are offered updates of the indexed journal lists, abstracts, author profiles, and links to other metadata. Editors and publishers may find particularly useful source selection criteria and apply for coverage of their peer-reviewed journals and grey literature sources. These criteria are aimed at accepting relevant sources with established editorial policies and quality controls.

摘要

专业书目数据库为从事特定学科研究并对证据进行全面系统综合分析的研究人员和作者提供了重要的在线工具。本文列举了一些已建立的专业数据库实例,从事多学科科学传播的人员可能会对此感兴趣。访问大多数专业数据库需要通过订阅计划和成为专业协会的会员。一些信息聚合商和数据库供应商,如EBSCOhost和ProQuest,借助专业关键词词库来促进高级搜索。通过专业数据库搜索条目与通过多学科研究平台(如PubMed、科学网和谷歌学术)进行的搜索互为补充。研究人员、作者、编辑和出版商必须熟悉生物医学和非生物医学书目检索工具的功能特点。数据库用户可以获取索引期刊列表、摘要、作者简介以及其他元数据链接的更新信息。编辑和出版商可能会发现特别有用的来源选择标准,并申请将其同行评审期刊和灰色文献来源纳入其中。这些标准旨在收录具有既定编辑政策和质量控制的相关来源。