Fung Constance H, Martin Jennifer L, Josephson Karen, Fiorentino Lavinia, Dzierzewski Joseph M, Jouldjian Stella, Song Yeonsu, Rodriguez Tapia Juan Carlos, Mitchell Michael N, Alessi Cathy A
a Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center , VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System , Los Angeles , California , USA.
b David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA , Los Angeles , California , USA.
Clin Gerontol. 2018 Mar-Apr;41(2):130-135. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2017.1356895. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
To examine relationships between cognitive expectancies about sleep and hypnotics and use of medications commonly used for insomnia (hypnotics).
We analyzed baseline data from older veterans who met diagnostic criteria for insomnia and were enrolled in a trial comparing CBTI delivered by a supervised, sleep educator to an attention control condition (N = 159; 97% male, mean age 72 years). We classified individuals as hypnotic users (N = 23) vs. non-users (N = 135) based upon medication diaries. Associations between hypnotic status and Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep-16 (DBAS) total score (0-10, higher = worse) and two DBAS medication item scores (Item 1: "…better off taking a sleeping pill rather than having a poor night's sleep;" Item 2: "Medication… probably the only solution to sleeplessness"; 0-10, higher = worse) were examined in logistic regression models.
Higher scores on the DBAS medication items (both odds ratios = 1.3; p-values < .001) were significantly associated with hypnotic use. DBAS-16 total score was not associated with hypnotic use.
Cognitive expectancy (dysfunctional beliefs) about hypnotics was associated with hypnotic use in older adults with chronic insomnia disorder.
Strategies that specifically target dysfunctional beliefs about hypnotics are needed and may impact hypnotic use in older adults.
研究关于睡眠和催眠药的认知预期与常用失眠治疗药物(催眠药)使用之间的关系。
我们分析了符合失眠诊断标准并参与一项试验的老年退伍军人的基线数据,该试验比较了由睡眠教育者监督实施的认知行为疗法失眠治疗(CBTI)与注意力控制组(N = 159;97%为男性,平均年龄72岁)。根据用药日记,我们将个体分为催眠药使用者(N = 23)和非使用者(N = 135)。在逻辑回归模型中,研究催眠药使用状态与睡眠功能障碍信念与态度量表-16(DBAS)总分(0 - 10分,分数越高情况越糟)以及两个DBAS用药项目得分(项目1:“……服用安眠药比睡眠不好要好”;项目2:“药物……可能是失眠的唯一解决办法”;0 - 10分,分数越高情况越糟)之间的关联。
DBAS用药项目得分较高(两个比值比均为1.3;p值 <.001)与催眠药使用显著相关。DBAS - 16总分与催眠药使用无关。
在患有慢性失眠症的老年人中,对催眠药的认知预期(功能障碍信念)与催眠药使用有关。
需要有专门针对对催眠药功能障碍信念的策略,这可能会影响老年人对催眠药的使用。