• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏移植和左心室辅助系统的筛查:来自 ScrEEning for advanced Heart Failure treatment(SEE-HF)研究的结果。

Screening for heart transplantation and left ventricular assist system: results from the ScrEEning for advanced Heart Failure treatment (SEE-HF) study.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Jan;20(1):152-160. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.975. Epub 2017 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1002/ejhf.975
PMID:28960673
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Heart transplantation (HTx) and implantable left ventricular assist systems (LVAS) improve outcomes in advanced heart failure but may be underutilized. We hypothesized that screening can identify appropriate candidates.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The ScrEEning for advanced Heart Failure treatment (SEE-HF) study was a multicentre prospective study screening patients with existing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and/or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for ejection fraction ≤40% and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV, and subsequently for guideline-based HTx and LVAS indication. Of 1722 (mean age 64 ± 14 years, 26% women) patients screened at eight centres in seven European countries, 121 (7.0%) were eligible and 99 (5.7%; mean age 61 ± 10 years, 19% women) patients were enrolled for detailed assessment. Twenty-six of the 99 enrolled patients (26%) were eligible for either HTx or LVAD (18 eligible for HTx; 7 eligible for LVAD; and 1 eligible for both). Eleven patients were listed for HTx and three received an LVAS. Eligible patients were 61 ± 8 years and 19% women, whereas those actually receiving intervention were 56 ± 8 years and 8% women.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with CRT and/or ICD, a minority have NYHA class III-IV heart failure and ejection fraction ≤40%. Among these, however, more than one-quarter have an unrecognized need for HTx or LVAS. When patients are offered intervention based on screening, many decline. Discrepancies exist between clinical and patient equipoise. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Unique Identifier: NCT00894387.

摘要

背景

心脏移植(HTx)和植入式左心室辅助系统(LVAS)可改善晚期心力衰竭患者的预后,但可能未得到充分利用。我们假设筛查可以识别合适的患者。

方法和结果

ScrEEning for advanced Heart Failure treatment(SEE-HF)研究是一项多中心前瞻性研究,对已接受心脏再同步治疗(CRT)和/或植入式心脏转复除颤器(ICD)的患者进行筛查,以确定射血分数≤40%且纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级 III-IV 级的患者,并随后根据指南确定 HTx 和 LVAS 的适应证。在七个欧洲国家的八个中心筛查了 1722 例(平均年龄 64±14 岁,26%为女性)患者,其中 121 例(7.0%)符合条件,99 例(5.7%;平均年龄 61±10 岁,19%为女性)患者纳入详细评估。在 99 例纳入的患者中,有 26 例(26%)符合 HTx 或 LVAD 的适应证(18 例适合 HTx;7 例适合 LVAD;1 例适合两者)。11 例患者接受 HTx 治疗,3 例患者接受 LVAS。符合条件的患者年龄为 61±8 岁,其中 19%为女性,而实际接受干预的患者年龄为 56±8 岁,其中 8%为女性。

结论

在接受 CRT 和/或 ICD 的患者中,少数患者存在 NYHA 心功能分级 III-IV 级和射血分数≤40%的心力衰竭。然而,在这些患者中,超过四分之一的患者有未被识别的 HTx 或 LVAS 需求。当根据筛查为患者提供干预时,许多人拒绝。临床和患者平衡之间存在差异。临床试验注册 临床试验.gov 唯一标识符:NCT00894387。

相似文献

1
Screening for heart transplantation and left ventricular assist system: results from the ScrEEning for advanced Heart Failure treatment (SEE-HF) study.心脏移植和左心室辅助系统的筛查:来自 ScrEEning for advanced Heart Failure treatment(SEE-HF)研究的结果。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Jan;20(1):152-160. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.975. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
2
A prospective comparison of mid-term outcomes in patients treated with heart transplantation with advanced age donors versus left ventricular assist device implantation.接受高龄供体心脏移植患者与接受左心室辅助装置植入患者中期结局的前瞻性比较。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Oct;23(4):584-92. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw164. Epub 2016 May 30.
3
Clinical effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in men and women with heart failure: findings from IMPROVE HF.心力衰竭男性和女性心脏再同步和植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗的临床效果:来自 IMPROVE HF 的研究结果。
Circ Heart Fail. 2014 Jan;7(1):146-53. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000789. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
4
Fully Magnetically Levitated Left Ventricular Assist System for Treating Advanced HF: A Multicenter Study.全磁悬浮左心室辅助系统治疗晚期心力衰竭:多中心研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Dec 15;66(23):2579-2589. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.083.
5
Cardiac transplantation is still the method of choice in the treatment of patients with severe heart failure.心脏移植仍然是治疗严重心力衰竭患者的首选方法。
Cardiol J. 2009;16(6):493-9.
6
INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support) Profiling Identifies Ambulatory Patients at High Risk on Medical Therapy After Hospitalizations for Heart Failure.INTERMACS(机械辅助循环支持跨机构注册中心)分析可识别因心力衰竭住院后接受药物治疗的高危门诊患者。
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Nov;9(11). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.116.003032.
7
Impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy on clinical outcomes in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.心脏再同步治疗对持续血流左心室辅助装置患者临床结局的影响。
J Card Fail. 2015 Mar;21(3):226-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2014.12.006. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
8
Mid-term survival after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device versus heart transplantation.持续血流左心室辅助装置与心脏移植后的中期生存率
Heart Vessels. 2016 May;31(5):722-33. doi: 10.1007/s00380-015-0654-4. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
9
Inverse Relationship of Blood Pressure to Long-Term Outcomes and Benefit of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Mild Heart Failure: A Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Long-Term Follow-Up Substudy.轻度心力衰竭患者血压与长期预后的负相关关系及心脏再同步治疗的益处:一项心脏再同步治疗长期随访亚研究的多中心自动除颤器植入试验
Circ Heart Fail. 2015 Sep;8(5):921-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002208. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
10
Predictors of spontaneous reverse remodeling in mild heart failure patients with left ventricular dysfunction.轻度左心室功能不全心力衰竭患者自发逆向重构的预测因素。
Circ Heart Fail. 2014 Jul;7(4):565-72. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000929. Epub 2014 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel device therapies in heart failure: focus on patient selection.心力衰竭的新型器械治疗:关注患者选择。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Feb 25;12:1419873. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1419873. eCollection 2025.
2
Knowledge and application of ESC/HFA guidelines in the management of advanced heart failure.欧洲心脏病学会/心力衰竭协会(ESC/HFA)指南在晚期心力衰竭管理中的知识与应用
Eur J Heart Fail. 2025 Jun;27(6):1126-1135. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3530. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
3
Sex-related differences in left ventricular assist device utilization and outcomes: results from the PCHF-VAD registry.
心脏充血性心力衰竭-心室辅助装置注册研究:左心室辅助装置应用和结局的性别差异。
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Apr;10(2):1054-1065. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14261. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
4
Predictors of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator use in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: impact of the predicted risk of sudden cardiac death and all-cause mortality.射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者中一级预防植入式心脏复律除颤器使用的预测因素:心脏性猝死和全因死亡率预测风险的影响
Eur J Heart Fail. 2022 Jul;24(7):1212-1222. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2530. Epub 2022 May 22.
5
Heart failure in the last year: progress and perspective.去年心力衰竭领域:进展与展望。
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Dec;7(6):3505-3530. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13124. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
6
Highlights in heart failure.心力衰竭的要点。
ESC Heart Fail. 2019 Dec;6(6):1105-1127. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12555.
7
Left ventricular function monitoring in heart failure.心力衰竭中的左心室功能监测
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2019 Dec;21(Suppl M):M17-M19. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suz218. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
8
Focusing on Referral Rather than Selection for Advanced Heart Failure Therapies.关注晚期心力衰竭治疗的转诊而非选择。
Card Fail Rev. 2019 Feb;5(1):24-26. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2018.35.1.
9
Updates in heart failure: what last year brought to us.心力衰竭的最新进展:去年带给我们的内容
ESC Heart Fail. 2018 Dec;5(6):989-1007. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12385.
10
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in grown-up patients with transposition of the great arteries-role of anti-tachycardia pacing.植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗大动脉转位成年患者——抗心动过速起搏的作用
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jun;10(Suppl 15):S1769-S1776. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.01.159.