Corvetto Marcia A, Fuentes Carlos, Araneda Andrea, Achurra Pablo, Miranda Pablo, Viviani Paola, Altermatt Fernando R
Anesthesiology Department, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Marcoleta 367, 8330024, Santiago, Chile.
Surgery Department, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 Sep 29;17(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0422-3.
Traditionally, technical proficiency for spinal anesthesia has been assessed using observational scales such as global rating scales or task specific checklists. However more objective metrics are required in order to improve novice's training programs. The aim of this study is to validate the hand motion analysis of the Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device (ICSAD) in a simulated model of spinal anesthesia.
Three groups of physicians with different levels of experience were video recorded performing a spinal anesthesia in a simulated lumbar puncture torso. Participants' technical performance was assessed with ICSAD, a Global Rating Scale (GRS) and a specific Checklist. Differences between the 3 groups were determined by Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc Dunn's correction for multiple comparisons. Spearman correlation coefficient between ICSAD variables and the scores of the observational scales were calculated to establish concurrent validity.
Thirty subjects participated in the study: ten novice (first year residents), 10 intermediate (third year residents) and 10 experts (attending anesthesiologists). GRS scores were significantly higher in experts, than intermediates and novices. Regarding total path length, number of movements and procedural time measured with ICSAD, all groups had significant differences between them (p = 0.026, p = 0.045 and p = 0.005 respectively). Spearman correlation coefficient was -0,46 (p = 0.012) between total path length measured with ICSAD and GRS scores.
This is the first validation study of ICSAD as an assessment tool for spinal anesthesia in a simulated model. Using ICSAD can discriminate proficiency between expert and novices and correlates with previously validated GRS. Its use in the assessment of spinal anesthesia proficiency provides complementary data to existing tools. Our results could be used to design future training programs with reliable goals to accomplish.
传统上,脊髓麻醉的技术熟练程度是使用诸如整体评分量表或特定任务清单等观察性量表来评估的。然而,为了改进新手培训计划,需要更客观的指标。本研究的目的是在脊髓麻醉模拟模型中验证帝国理工学院外科评估设备(ICSAD)的手部动作分析。
对三组经验水平不同的医生在模拟腰椎穿刺躯干模型中进行脊髓麻醉的过程进行录像。使用ICSAD、整体评分量表(GRS)和特定清单对参与者的技术表现进行评估。三组之间的差异通过Kruskal-Wallis检验确定,并采用事后Dunn校正进行多重比较。计算ICSAD变量与观察性量表得分之间的Spearman相关系数,以建立同时效度。
30名受试者参与了该研究:10名新手(第一年住院医师)、10名中级医生(第三年住院医师)和10名专家(主治麻醉医师)。专家的GRS得分显著高于中级医生和新手。关于用ICSAD测量的总路径长度、动作次数和操作时间,所有组之间均存在显著差异(分别为p = 0.026、p = 0.045和p = 0.005)。ICSAD测量的总路径长度与GRS得分之间的Spearman相关系数为-0.46(p = 0.012)。
这是ICSAD作为脊髓麻醉模拟模型评估工具的首次验证研究。使用ICSAD可以区分专家和新手的熟练程度,并与先前验证的GRS相关。其在脊髓麻醉熟练程度评估中的应用为现有工具提供了补充数据。我们的结果可用于设计未来具有可靠目标的培训计划。