Suppr超能文献

评估双侧皮质脊髓兴奋性:双线圈 TMS 方法的验证。

Towards assessing corticospinal excitability bilaterally: Validation of a double-coil TMS method.

机构信息

Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

J Neurosci Methods. 2018 Jan 1;293:162-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.09.016. Epub 2017 Sep 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

For several decades, Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been used to monitor corticospinal excitability (CSE) changes in various contexts. Habitually, single-coil TMS is applied over one primary motor cortex (M1), eliciting motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in a contralateral limb muscle, usually a hand effector. However, in many situations, it would be useful to obtain MEPs in both hands simultaneously, to track CSE bilaterally. Such an approach requires stimulating both M1 concurrently while avoiding interference between the two descending stimuli.

NEW METHOD

We examined MEPs obtained at rest using a double-coil TMS approach where the two M1 are stimulated with a 1ms inter-pulse interval (double-coil). MEPs were acquired using double-coil (MEP) or single-coil (MEP) TMS, at five different intensities of stimulation (100, 115, 130, 145 or 160% of the resting motor threshold, rMT). Given the 1ms inter-pulse interval in double-coil trials, MEP were either evoked by a 1st (MEP) or a 2nd (MEP) TMS pulse.

RESULTS

All MEP (MEP=MEP, MEP and MEP) were equivalent, regardless of the hand within which they were elicited, the intensity of stimulation or the pulse order.

COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD

This method allows one to observe state-related CSE changes for the two hands simultaneously on a trial-by-trial basis.

CONCLUSION

These results infer the absence of any neural interactions between the two cortico-spinal volleys with double-coil TMS. Hence, this technique can be reliably used to assess CSE bilaterally, opening new research perspectives for scientists interested in physiological markers of activity in the motor output system.

摘要

背景

几十年来,经颅磁刺激(TMS)已被用于监测各种情况下皮质脊髓兴奋性(CSE)的变化。通常,单线圈 TMS 应用于一个初级运动皮层(M1),在对侧肢体肌肉中引发运动诱发电位(MEP),通常是手部效应器。然而,在许多情况下,同时获得双手的 MEP 以跟踪双侧 CSE 会很有用。这种方法需要同时刺激两个 M1,同时避免两个下行刺激之间的干扰。

新方法

我们使用双线圈 TMS 方法检查了在休息时获得的 MEP,其中两个 M1 以 1ms 的脉冲间隔(双线圈)进行刺激。MEP 是使用双线圈(MEP)或单线圈(MEP)TMS 在五种不同的刺激强度(100、115、130、145 或 160%的静息运动阈值,rMT)下获得的。由于双线圈试验中的 1ms 脉冲间隔,MEP 可以由第 1 个(MEP)或第 2 个(MEP)TMS 脉冲引发。

结果

无论在哪个手中引发,刺激强度或脉冲顺序如何,所有 MEP(MEP=MEP、MEP 和 MEP)都是等效的。

与现有方法的比较

这种方法允许在逐次试验的基础上同时观察双手的状态相关 CSE 变化。

结论

这些结果推断双线圈 TMS 之间不存在两个皮质脊髓冲动之间的任何神经相互作用。因此,这种技术可以可靠地用于双侧 CSE 的评估,为对运动输出系统活动的生理标志物感兴趣的科学家开辟新的研究视角。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验