Silvanto Juha, Cattaneo Zaira
University of Westminster, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Psychology, 115 New Cavendish Street, W1W 6UW London, UK.
Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; Brain Connectivity Center, National Neurological Institute C. Mondino, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Brain Cogn. 2017 Dec;119:32-38. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2017.09.007. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
The behavioral effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) are often nonlinear; factors such as stimulation intensity and brain state can modulate the impact of TMS on observable behavior in qualitatively different manner. Here we propose a theoretical framework to account for these effects. In this model, there are distinct intensity ranges for facilitatory and suppressive effects of TMS - low intensities facilitate neural activity and behavior whereas high intensities induce suppression. The key feature of the model is that these ranges are shifted by changes in neural excitability: consequently, a TMS intensity, which normally induces suppression, can have a facilitatory effect if the stimulated neurons are being inhibited by ongoing task-related processes or preconditioning. For example, adaptation reduces excitability of adapted neurons; the outcome is that TMS intensities which inhibit non-adapted neurons induce a facilitation on adapted neural representations, leading to reversal of adaptation effects. In conventional "virtual lesion" paradigms, similar effects occur because neurons not involved in task-related processes are inhibited by the ongoing task. The resulting reduction in excitability can turn high intensity "inhibitory" TMS to low intensity "facilitatory" TMS for these neurons, and as task-related neuronal representations are in the inhibitory range, the outcome is a reduction in signal-to-noise ratio and behavioral impairment.
经颅磁刺激(TMS)的行为效应通常是非线性的;刺激强度和脑状态等因素能够以性质不同的方式调节TMS对可观察行为的影响。在此,我们提出一个理论框架来解释这些效应。在该模型中,TMS的促进和抑制效应存在不同的强度范围——低强度促进神经活动和行为,而高强度则引发抑制。该模型的关键特征在于,这些范围会因神经兴奋性的变化而发生偏移:因此,如果受刺激的神经元正受到正在进行的与任务相关的过程或预处理的抑制,那么通常会引发抑制的TMS强度可能会产生促进作用。例如,适应性会降低适应神经元的兴奋性;结果是,抑制未适应神经元的TMS强度会对适应的神经表征产生促进作用,从而导致适应效应的逆转。在传统的“虚拟损伤”范式中,也会出现类似的效应,因为未参与与任务相关过程的神经元会受到正在进行的任务的抑制。由此导致的兴奋性降低会使高强度的“抑制性”TMS对这些神经元而言转变为低强度的“促进性”TMS,并且由于与任务相关的神经元表征处于抑制范围内,结果是信噪比降低和行为受损。