A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Trainee-Directed Virtual Reality Simulation Training and Box Trainer on the Acquisition of Laparoscopic Suturing Skills.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the proficiency of novices in acquiring laparoscopic suturing skills following training in a virtual reality simulator or box trainer compared to no training.

METHODS

This was a RCT in a university-affiliated teaching hospital recruiting participants who had no laparoscopic suturing experience to have suturing skill training in the virtual reality simulator, box trainer, or no training as control. Trainees were allowed to terminate training when they perceived competence in the procedure. Suturing skills were tested in the box trainer and scored using a modified Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills questionnaire by their own self-evaluation and two experienced gynaecological laparoscopists.

RESULTS

Of the 36 participants recruited, 27 (75%) had no laparoscopic experience. Participants with no laparoscopic experience took longer to complete training than those with experience (median 90 minutes [interquartile range (IQR) 80-115] vs. 55 min [IQR 40-65], respectively; P = 0.044). There were no differences in successful completion of the task (7/12 [58.3%], 10/12 [83.3%], 7/12 [58.3%]; P = 0.325), median suturing time in seconds (628 [IQR 460-835], 611 [IQR 434-691], 609 [IQR 540-837]; P = 0.702), mean subjective (mean ± SD 9.8 ± 1.8, 10.4 ± 2.8, 9.3 ± 2.4; P = 0.710), and objective (7.2 ± 1.8, 8.2 ± 2.1, 7.6 ± 1.7; P = 0.426) modified Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills score in the simulator, pelvic trainer, and control groups, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient of the two reviewers was 0.422 (95% CI 0.159-0.717).

CONCLUSION

Trainees were unable to accurately assess themselves as to skill level in laparoscopic suturing. A longer training time is required for novices to master laparoscopic suturing using a simulator or box trainer.