Jastrzembski Jillian A, Bee Madeleine Y, Sacks Gavin L
Department of Food Science, Stocking Hall, Cornell University , Ithaca, New York 14853, United States.
J Agric Food Chem. 2017 Oct 25;65(42):9353-9359. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b03638. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
Ambient ionization mass spectrometric (AI-MS) techniques like direct analysis in real time (DART) offer the potential for rapid quantitative analyses of trace volatiles in food matrices, but performance is generally limited by the lack of preconcentration and extraction steps. The sensitivity and selectivity of AI-MS approaches can be improved through solid-phase microextraction (SPME) with appropriate thin-film geometries, for example, solid-phase mesh-enhanced sorption from headspace (SPMESH). This work improves the SPMESH-DART-MS approach for use in food analyses and validates the approach for trace volatile analysis for two compounds in real samples (grape macerates). SPMESH units prepared with different sorbent coatings were evaluated for their ability to extract a range of odor-active volatiles, with poly(dimethylsiloxane)/divinylbenzene giving the most satisfactory results. In combination with high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS), detection limits for SPMESH-DART-MS under 4 ng/L in less than 30 s acquisition times could be achieved for some volatiles [3-isobutyl-2-methoxypyrazine (IBMP) and β-damascenone]. A comparison of SPMESH-DART-MS and SPME-GC-MS quantitation of linalool and IBMP demonstrates excellent agreement between the two methods for real grape samples (r ≥ 0.90), although linalool measurements appeared to also include isobaric interference.
实时直接分析(DART)等常压电离质谱(AI-MS)技术为食品基质中痕量挥发性物质的快速定量分析提供了可能,但由于缺乏预浓缩和萃取步骤,其性能通常受到限制。通过采用适当薄膜几何形状的固相微萃取(SPME),例如顶空固相网状增强吸附(SPMESH),可以提高AI-MS方法的灵敏度和选择性。这项工作改进了用于食品分析的SPMESH-DART-MS方法,并验证了该方法对实际样品(葡萄浸出物)中两种化合物的痕量挥发性分析能力。评估了用不同吸附剂涂层制备的SPMESH单元对一系列气味活性挥发性物质的萃取能力,其中聚(二甲基硅氧烷)/二乙烯基苯的效果最为理想。结合高分辨率质谱(HRMS),对于某些挥发性物质[3-异丁基-2-甲氧基吡嗪(IBMP)和β-大马酮],在不到30秒的采集时间内,SPMESH-DART-MS的检测限可低于4 ng/L。对芳樟醇和IBMP的SPMESH-DART-MS和SPME-GC-MS定量比较表明,对于实际葡萄样品,两种方法之间具有极好的一致性(r≥0.90),尽管芳樟醇的测量似乎也包括等压干扰。