• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Urinary metabolites in patients undergoing coronary catheterization via the radial versus femoral artery approach.经桡动脉与股动脉途径行冠状动脉导管插入术患者的尿液代谢产物
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2017 Oct;30(4):404-409. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2017.11930207.
2
Association of radial versus femoral access with contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.在接受ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中,桡动脉与股动脉入路与对比剂诱导的急性肾损伤的相关性。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016 Dec;17(8):546-551. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.07.008. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
3
Comparative Efficacy of Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approach for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经桡动脉与经股动脉途径用于冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的疗效比较
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Aug 15;118(4):482-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.05.038. Epub 2016 May 29.
4
A reality check in transradial access: a single-centre comparison of transradial and transfemoral access for abdominal and peripheral intervention.经桡动脉入路的现实情况检查:经桡动脉与经股动脉入路用于腹部和外周介入的单中心比较。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Jan;29(1):68-74. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5580-2. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
5
Operator learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary interventions: implications for the initiation of a transradial access program in contemporary US practice.经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗的术者学习曲线:对当代美国实践中开展经桡动脉入路项目的启示
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2014 Jun;15(4):195-9. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
6
A Single-Center, Randomized, Controlled Comparison of the Transradial vs Transfemoral Approach for Cerebral Angiography: A Learning Curve Analysis.单中心、随机、对照研究经桡动脉与经股动脉入路行脑血管造影的对比:学习曲线分析。
J Endovasc Ther. 2019 Oct;26(5):717-724. doi: 10.1177/1526602819859285. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
7
Effect of Access Site Choice on Acute Kidney Injury After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后穿刺部位选择对急性肾损伤的影响
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Dec 15;120(12):2141-2145. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.08.039. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
8
Radial versus femoral access site for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients suffering acute myocardial infarction : A randomized prospective multicenter trial.急性心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中桡动脉与股动脉穿刺部位:一项随机前瞻性多中心试验
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2018 Mar;130(5-6):182-189. doi: 10.1007/s00508-017-1260-5. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
9
Full conversion from transfemoral to transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions results in a similar success rate and a rapid reduction of in-hospital cardiac and vascular major events.经股动脉入路完全转为经桡动脉入路行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗可获得相似的成功率,并可迅速减少住院期间心脏和血管主要不良事件。
EuroIntervention. 2013 Jul;9(3):345-52. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I3A56.
10
Our experience with transradial approach for coronary angiography.我们采用桡动脉途径进行冠状动脉造影的经验。
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2008 Apr;36(3):163-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Dying cells actively regulate adaptive immune responses.垂死的细胞积极调节适应性免疫反应。
Nat Rev Immunol. 2017 Apr;17(4):262-275. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.9. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
2
Comparative Efficacy of Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approach for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经桡动脉与经股动脉途径用于冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的疗效比较
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Aug 15;118(4):482-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.05.038. Epub 2016 May 29.
3
Quantitative Organic Acids in Urine by Two Dimensional Gas Chromatography-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (GCxGC-TOFMS).二维气相色谱-飞行时间质谱法(GCxGC-TOFMS)测定尿液中的定量有机酸
Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1378:183-97. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3182-8_20.
4
Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中桡动脉与股动脉入路的随机多中心试验。
Lancet. 2015 Jun 20;385(9986):2465-76. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60292-6. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
5
Gender- and disease-specific urinary thioredoxin in chronic kidney disease patients with or without type 2 diabetic nephropathy.患有或未患2型糖尿病肾病的慢性肾病患者中按性别和疾病分类的尿硫氧还蛋白
Nephrology (Carlton). 2015 May;20(5):368-74. doi: 10.1111/nep.12403.
6
Renal redox dysregulation in AKI: application for oxidative stress marker of AKI.急性肾损伤中的肾氧化还原失调:急性肾损伤氧化应激标志物的应用。
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2014 Dec 15;307(12):F1342-51. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00381.2013. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
7
Comparison of risk of acute kidney injury after primary percutaneous coronary interventions with the transradial approach versus the transfemoral approach (from the PRIPITENA urban registry).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗桡动脉入路与股动脉入路对急性肾损伤风险的比较(来自 PRIPITENA 城市登记研究)。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Sep 15;114(6):820-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.06.010. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
8
Quantitative proteomic analysis reveals potential diagnostic markers and pathways involved in pathogenesis of renal cell carcinoma.定量蛋白质组学分析揭示了肾细胞癌发病机制中潜在的诊断标志物和相关通路。
Oncotarget. 2014 Jan 30;5(2):506-18. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.1529.
9
Reading between the (guide)lines--the KDIGO practice guideline on acute kidney injury in the individual patient.解读(指南)字里行间之意——KDIGO 关于个体患者急性肾损伤的实践指南
Kidney Int. 2014 Jan;85(1):39-48. doi: 10.1038/ki.2013.378. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
10
Proteomics: improving biomarker translation to modern medicine?蛋白质组学:能否推动生物标志物转化应用于现代医学?
Genome Med. 2013 Feb 27;5(2):17. doi: 10.1186/gm421. eCollection 2013.

经桡动脉与股动脉途径行冠状动脉导管插入术患者的尿液代谢产物

Urinary metabolites in patients undergoing coronary catheterization via the radial versus femoral artery approach.

作者信息

Vasudevan Anupama, Schussler Jeffrey M, Won Jane I, Ashcraft Paula, Bolanos Ivy, Williams Matthew, Bottiglieri Teodoro, Velasco Carlos E, McCullough Peter A

机构信息

Baylor Heart and Vascular Institute, Dallas, Texas (Vasudevan, Schussler, Won, Velasco, McCullough); Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine, Dallas Campus, Dallas Texas (Vasudevan, Schussler, McCullough); Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, Texas (Vasudevan, Won); Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas (Schussler, Velasco, McCullough); and Baylor Scott & White Research Institute of Metabolic Disease, Dallas, Texas (Ashcraft, Bolanos, Williams, Bottiglieri).

出版信息

Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2017 Oct;30(4):404-409. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2017.11930207.

DOI:10.1080/08998280.2017.11930207
PMID:28966445
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5595375/
Abstract

The transradial approach (TRA) for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with lower rates of vascular complications and acute kidney injury when compared to the transfemoral approach (TFA). Urine metabolites and proteins may be useful in identifying the dynamic changes at the vascular endothelial cell level. We attempted to explore the changes in the measurable signals of endothelial and nephron injury within 60 to 90 minutes after catheterization among those with the TRA and TFA approaches. Consecutive patients of a single interventionist who underwent coronary angiography between June 2015 and May 2016 were included. Of the 60 patients included in the analysis, the baseline characteristics were similar between those with a TRA (n = 30) and TFA (n = 30) approach. The values of the biomarkers were natural log transformed for the analysis. We found that the mean values of heat shock protein 27, taurine, and sulfuric acid did not significantly change after the procedure. However, the median value of thioredoxin decreased ( = 0.002) and that of talose increased ( = 0.01) after the procedure. None of the patients in our cohort experienced vascular complications or acute kidney injury. No differences in the values of urinary metabolites (pre, post, and delta) were found between TRA and TFA except for postprocedural thioredoxin. In conclusion, this exploratory study showed no difference in the patterns of acute vascular/renal injury metabolic markers before and after catheterization irrespective of the arterial access site.

摘要

与经股动脉途径(TFA)相比,经桡动脉途径(TRA)用于冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时,血管并发症和急性肾损伤的发生率较低。尿液代谢物和蛋白质可能有助于识别血管内皮细胞水平的动态变化。我们试图探讨经TRA和TFA途径的患者在插管后60至90分钟内内皮和肾单位损伤可测量信号的变化。纳入了2015年6月至2016年5月期间由单一介入医生进行冠状动脉造影的连续患者。在分析纳入的60例患者中,TRA组(n = 30)和TFA组(n = 30)的基线特征相似。对生物标志物的值进行自然对数转换以进行分析。我们发现,热休克蛋白27、牛磺酸和硫酸的平均值在手术后没有显著变化。然而,手术后硫氧还蛋白的中位数降低(P = 0.002),塔罗糖的中位数升高(P = 0.01)。我们队列中的患者均未发生血管并发症或急性肾损伤。除了术后硫氧还蛋白外,TRA和TFA之间在尿液代谢物值(术前、术后和差值)方面未发现差异。总之,这项探索性研究表明,无论动脉入路部位如何,插管前后急性血管/肾损伤代谢标志物的模式均无差异。