Park Hyoung Keun, Kim Hyeong Gon, Yang Dae Yul, Choi Woo Suk, Paick Sung Hyun, Chung Hong, Yang Sang-Kuk
Department of Urology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Urology, Hallym University Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2019 Jan;11(1):56-60. doi: 10.1111/luts.12194. Epub 2017 Oct 1.
The aim of the present study was to prospectively evaluate the effect of aclatonium on dry mouth in patients with overactive bladder (OAB) after treatment with solifenacin.
A multicenter randomized double-blind controlled trial was conducted. The study subjects were men and women who had been diagnosed with OAB for ≥3 months and presented with a total Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) ≥3. Eligible subjects were randomized to receive 5 mg solifenacin with placebo or 5 mg solifenacin with 150 mg aclatonium once daily for 8 weeks. Subjects rated dry mouth using a visual analog scale (VAS) and completed the OAB-questionnaire (OAB-q) short form (SF) and OABSS questionnaires at baseline and after 8 weeks treatment. Dry mouth was defined as a VAS score >30 points (range 0-100).
Overall, 92 patients (49 and 43 in the placebo and aclatonium groups, respectively) completed the 8-week treatment. In patients who had dry mouth at baseline, no differences were detected in changes in the dry mouth VAS, OABSS, or OAB-q SF scores between the 2 groups. However, in patients who had no dry mouth at baseline, the change in dry mouth VAS score was significantly lower in the aclatonium- than placebo-treated group: the VAS score increased 20 points in the placebo group compared with 9 points in the aclatonium group (P = .03). However, there were no significant differences in changes in the OABSS and OAB-q SF scores between the 2 groups.
Aclatonium decreased dry mouth without disturbing treatment efficacy in patients who did not have dry mouth before treatment.
本研究旨在前瞻性评估阿氯托铵对索利那新治疗后膀胱过度活动症(OAB)患者口干的影响。
进行了一项多中心随机双盲对照试验。研究对象为已被诊断为OAB≥3个月且总膀胱过度活动症症状评分(OABSS)≥3的男性和女性。符合条件的受试者被随机分为两组,一组每天接受5mg索利那新加安慰剂,另一组每天接受5mg索利那新加150mg阿氯托铵,为期8周。受试者使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)对口干进行评分,并在基线和治疗8周后完成OAB问卷(OAB-q)简表(SF)和OABSS问卷。口干定义为VAS评分>30分(范围0-100)。
总体而言,92例患者(安慰剂组49例,阿氯托铵组43例)完成了8周治疗。在基线时口干的患者中,两组之间口干VAS、OABSS或OAB-q SF评分的变化未检测到差异。然而,在基线时无口干的患者中,阿氯托铵治疗组口干VAS评分的变化显著低于安慰剂治疗组:安慰剂组VAS评分增加20分,而阿氯托铵组增加9分(P = 0.03)。然而,两组之间OABSS和OAB-q SF评分的变化无显著差异。
阿氯托铵可减轻治疗前无口干患者的口干症状,且不影响治疗效果。