Chua Michael E, See Manuel C, Esmeňa Ednalyn B, Balingit Jaime C, Morales Marcelino L
Institute of Urology, St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines.
Department of Preventive and Community Medicine, St. Luke's College of Medicine, Quezon City, Philippines.
Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2018 May;10(2):135-142. doi: 10.1111/luts.12152. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gabapentin in comparison to solifenacin succinate and placebo for the treatment of adult patients with overactive bladder (OAB).
A 12-week, randomized, double-blind, double dummy placebo-controlled, clinical trial was conducted between October 2010 and August 2014 at a tertiary medical center. Eligible and consenting patients included were randomized into three treatment groups (placebo, gabapentin and solifenacin). After a 12-week treatment period, an intention to treat analysis was applied to assess between group differences on the micturitions and urgency episodes per 24 h; which were evaluated by 3-day micturition diary mean change from baseline to post treatment. Health related quality of life (HRQOL) domains were likewise assessed by OAB questionnaire (OAB-q). Adverse event were monitored and summarized. Study results were analyzed at statistical significance of 0.05. (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01486706) RESULT: A total of 94 participants were included for end-study efficacy and safety analysis. Compared to placebo, gabapentin and solifenacin have statistically significant improvement in mean number of micturitions per 24 h (adjusted mean difference [AMD] -1.179, 95%CI -1.98, -0.38; P < 0.001; -1.706, 95%CI -2.52, -0.09; P < 0.001; respectively), and in mean number of urgency episodes per 24 h (AMD -0.903, 95%CI -1.44, -0.37; P < 0.001; -0.896, 95%CI -1.44, -0.35; P < 0.001). Gabapentin also demonstrated significant improvement over the solifenacin in the mean number of nocturia episodes/24 h (AMD -0.607, 95%CI -1.04, -0.18; P < 0.001). Adverse event related to gabapentin treatment was lesser than solifenacin, and comparable to placebo.
Gabapentin treatment with acceptable safety profile, improves OAB symptoms and HRQOL domains.
比较加巴喷丁与琥珀酸索利那新及安慰剂治疗成人膀胱过度活动症(OAB)的疗效和安全性。
2010年10月至2014年8月在一家三级医疗中心进行了一项为期12周的随机、双盲、双模拟安慰剂对照临床试验。纳入的符合条件并同意参与的患者被随机分为三个治疗组(安慰剂组、加巴喷丁组和琥珀酸索利那新组)。经过12周的治疗期后,采用意向性分析评估每组每24小时排尿次数和尿急发作次数的组间差异;通过3天排尿日记从基线到治疗后的平均变化来评估。同样通过OAB问卷(OAB-q)评估健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)领域。监测并汇总不良事件。研究结果在0.05的统计学显著性水平上进行分析。(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT01486706)结果:共有94名参与者纳入最终研究的疗效和安全性分析。与安慰剂相比,加巴喷丁和琥珀酸索利那新在每24小时平均排尿次数上有统计学显著改善(调整后平均差异[AMD]-1.179,95%置信区间-1.98,-0.38;P<0.001;-1.706,95%置信区间-2.52,-0.09;P<0.001;),以及在每24小时平均尿急发作次数上(AMD-0.903,95%置信区间-1.44,-0.37;P<0.001;-0.896,95%置信区间-1.44,-0.35;P<0.001)。加巴喷丁在每24小时夜尿发作次数的平均值上也比琥珀酸索利那新有显著改善(AMD-0.607,95%置信区间-1.04,-0.18;P<0.001)。与加巴喷丁治疗相关的不良事件少于琥珀酸索利那新,且与安慰剂相当。
加巴喷丁治疗具有可接受的安全性,可改善OAB症状和HRQOL领域。