• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Response to Re: Intrapartum intervention rates and perinatal outcomes following induction of labour compared to expectant management at term from an Australian perinatal centre.

作者信息

Zhao Yi, Flatley Christopher, Kumar Sailesh

机构信息

Mater Mothers' Hospital, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Mater Research Institute, University of Queensland, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Oct;57(5):E10. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12677.

DOI:10.1111/ajo.12677
PMID:28967692
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Response to Re: Intrapartum intervention rates and perinatal outcomes following induction of labour compared to expectant management at term from an Australian perinatal centre.对《关于澳大利亚一家围产期中心足月引产与期待管理相比的产时干预率及围产期结局》一文回复的回应
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Oct;57(5):E10. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12677.
2
Re: Intrapartum intervention rates and perinatal outcomes following induction of labour compared to expectant management at term from an Australian perinatal centre.回复：与澳大利亚一家围产期中心足月时的期待管理相比，引产时的产时干预率和围产期结局。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Oct;57(5):E9. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12658.
3
Intrapartum intervention rates and perinatal outcomes following induction of labour compared to expectant management at term from an Australian perinatal centre.与澳大利亚一家围产期中心足月时的期待管理相比，引产时的产时干预率和围产期结局。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Feb;57(1):40-48. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12576.
4
Induction of labour versus expectant management at term by subgroups of maternal age: an individual patient data meta-analysis.按产妇年龄亚组对足月引产与期待管理进行的个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Feb;197:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.11.004. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
5
Outcomes of mifepristone usage for cervical ripening and induction of labour in full-term pregnancy. Randomized controlled trial.米非司酮用于足月妊娠宫颈成熟及引产的效果。随机对照试验。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Oct;217:144-149. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.08.038. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
6
Intrapartum intervention rates and perinatal outcomes following induction of labour after 41 + 0 weeks compared to expectant management.与期待管理相比，41+0周后引产的产时干预率和围产期结局。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Nov;30(21):2517-2520. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1255190. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
7
Timing induction of labour at 41 or 42 weeks? A closer look at time frames of comparison: A review.在41周或42周时引产的时机？对比较时间框架的深入研究：一篇综述。
Midwifery. 2018 Nov;66:111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.07.011. Epub 2018 Aug 11.
8
Intrauterine growth restriction at term: induction or spontaneous labour? Disproportionate intrauterine growth intervention trial at term (DIGITAT): a pilot study.足月时的宫内生长受限：引产还是自然分娩？足月时不成比例的宫内生长干预试验（DIGITAT）：一项试点研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Mar 1;125(1):54-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.06.018. Epub 2005 Jul 27.
9
Has perinatal outcome improved after introduction of a guideline in favour of routine induction and increased surveillance prior to 42 weeks of gestation?: A cross-sectional population-based registry study.在引入一项支持在妊娠42周前进行常规引产和加强监测的指南后，围产期结局是否有所改善？一项基于人群的横断面登记研究。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2016 Dec;10:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
10
Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial.大胎儿引产与期待管理的随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2015 Jun 27;385(9987):2600-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61904-8. Epub 2015 Apr 8.