Killip D E, Fuller J L, Kerber P E
J Dent Educ. 1979 Sep;43(10 Pt 1):547-51.
This study reports on the validity of a structured, standardized admission interview for dentistry. An entire class of 86 fourth-year dental students at The University of Iowa was studied, and the relationships between information from the interview, faculty ratings, and numerous dental and predental academic data were compared. Many correlations were found to be significant, which permitted technical description of three aspects of validity: concurrent, content, and construct. Reliability of both the instrument and the interview method were shown to affect validity.
本研究报告了牙科结构化、标准化入学面试的有效性。对爱荷华大学一个完整班级的86名四年级牙科学生进行了研究,并比较了面试信息、教师评分以及众多牙科和牙科学前学术数据之间的关系。发现许多相关性具有显著性,这使得能够从三个方面对有效性进行技术描述:同时效度、内容效度和结构效度。研究表明,工具和面试方法的可靠性都会影响效度。