Nancy U. Lin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Oliver Rosen, Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, Waltham, MA; Tatiana Prowell, Laleh Amiri-Kordestani, and Joohee Sul, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring; Tatiana Prowell, Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Antoinette R. Tan and Edward S. Kim, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC; Marina Kozak, Friends of Cancer Research; Louise Perkins, Melanoma Research Alliance, Washington, DC; Julia White, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Katherine Beal, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Richard Gaynor, Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN.
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 20;35(33):3760-3773. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.0761. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
Purpose Broadening trial eligibility to improve accrual and access and to better reflect intended-to-treat populations has been recognized as a priority. Historically, patients with brain metastases have been understudied, because of restrictive eligibility across all phases of clinical trials. Methods In 2016, after a literature search and series of teleconferences, a multistakeholder workshop was convened. Our working group focused on developing consensus recommendations regarding the inclusion of patients with brain metastases in clinical trials, as part of a broader effort that encompassed minimum age, HIV status, and organ dysfunction. The working group attempted to balance the needs of protecting patient safety, facilitating access to investigational therapies, and ensuring trial integrity. On the basis of input at the workshop, guidelines were further refined and finalized. Results The working group identified three key populations: those with treated/stable brain metastases, defined as patients who have received prior therapy for their brain metastases and whose CNS disease is radiographically stable at study entry; those with active brain metastases, defined as new and/or progressive brain metastases at the time of study entry; and those with leptomeningeal disease. In most circumstances, the working group encourages the inclusion of patients with treated/stable brain metastases in clinical trials. A framework of key considerations for patients with active brain metastases was developed. For patients with leptomeningeal disease, inclusion of a separate cohort in both early-phase and later-phase trials is recommended, if CNS activity is anticipated and when relevant to the specific disease type. Conclusion Expanding eligibility to be more inclusive of patients with brain metastasis is justified in many cases and may speed the development of effective therapies in this area of high clinical need.
目的
扩大试验纳入标准,以提高入组率和可及性,并更好地反映意向治疗人群,这已被视为优先事项。由于在临床试验的所有阶段都有严格的纳入标准,因此历史上脑转移患者的研究较少。
方法
2016 年,在进行文献检索和一系列电话会议之后,召开了一次多方利益相关者研讨会。我们的工作组专注于制定关于将脑转移患者纳入临床试验的共识建议,作为涵盖最小年龄、HIV 状态和器官功能障碍的更广泛工作的一部分。工作组试图平衡保护患者安全、促进获得试验性治疗以及确保试验完整性的需求。根据研讨会的意见,对指南进行了进一步的细化和最终确定。
结果
接受过治疗/稳定的脑转移患者,定义为先前接受过脑转移治疗且在研究入组时中枢神经系统疾病影像学稳定的患者;有活动脑转移的患者,定义为在研究入组时存在新发和/或进展性脑转移的患者;以及有软脑膜疾病的患者。在大多数情况下,工作组鼓励将接受过治疗/稳定的脑转移患者纳入临床试验。为有活动脑转移的患者制定了一个关键考虑因素的框架。对于有软脑膜疾病的患者,如果预计中枢神经系统有活性,并且与特定疾病类型相关,则建议在早期和晚期试验中分别纳入一个单独的队列。
结论
在许多情况下,扩大纳入标准以更包容脑转移患者是合理的,这可能会加速这一高临床需求领域的有效治疗方法的开发。