• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项以社会生态模型为指导,对与临床试验资格差异相关因素的考察。

An examination of factors associated with disparities in clinical trial eligibility guided by the Socioecological Model.

作者信息

Zhao Yayi, Amorrortu Rossybelle P, Hicks J Kevin, Garcia Melany A, Haura Eric B, Yin Jun, Vadaparampil Susan T, Rollison Dana E

机构信息

Cancer Epidemiology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.

Department of Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2025 Jul 1;131(13):e35944. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35944.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.35944
PMID:40530674
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12263167/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients from diverse demographic groups remain underrepresented in cancer clinical trials (CCTs) because of various factors, including disparities in eligibility. In the current study, the authors investigated associations between demographic characteristics and factors associated with CCT eligibility and enrollment using real-world data.

METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis was conducted among 113,030 adult patients with cancer who were treated at Moffitt Cancer Center between 2011 and 2021. Eligibility criteria from 100 CCTs were manually abstracted and conceptually mapped to variables in the Moffitt Cancer Analytics Platform. Other factors potentially affecting patient eligibility or enrollment in CCTs were identified following the Socioecological Model and were compared across patient groups by age, sex, race, and ethnicity.

RESULTS

The most frequent eligibility criteria in the abstracted CCTs included laboratory results associated with liver function (89%) and bone marrow function (88%). Thirty-nine percent of the protocols required genetic testing. Black/African American patients experienced a higher prevalence of diabetes (Δ = 3.2%), human immunodeficiency virus infection (Δ = 1.4%), and abnormal laboratory results compared with White patients. Hispanic patients experienced a higher prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus infection (Δ = 0.2%) and a history of organ transplantation (Δ = 0.2%) compared with non-Hispanic patients. Compared with younger patients, older adults had a higher prevalence of nononcologic conditions. Female, Black, and/or Hispanic patients were more likely to experience barriers to care, including childcare and transportation, and to live in more socially deprived areas compared with male, White, or non-Hispanic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Restrictive CCT eligibility criteria and social determinants of health may pose structural barriers that disproportionately affect patient diversity. Investigators should leverage real-world data to design appropriate trial eligibility criteria.

摘要

背景

由于包括资格差异在内的各种因素,不同人口群体的患者在癌症临床试验(CCT)中的代表性仍然不足。在本研究中,作者使用真实世界数据调查了人口统计学特征与CCT资格和入组相关因素之间的关联。

方法

对2011年至2021年期间在莫菲特癌症中心接受治疗的113,030名成年癌症患者进行了横断面分析。从100项CCT中手动提取资格标准,并在概念上映射到莫菲特癌症分析平台中的变量。按照社会生态模型确定了其他可能影响患者参与CCT资格或入组的因素,并按年龄、性别、种族和族裔对患者组进行了比较。

结果

提取的CCT中最常见的资格标准包括与肝功能(89%)和骨髓功能(88%)相关的实验室检查结果。39%的方案要求进行基因检测。与白人患者相比,黑人/非裔美国患者患糖尿病(差异=3.2%)、人类免疫缺陷病毒感染(差异=1.4%)的患病率更高,实验室检查结果异常的情况也更多。与非西班牙裔患者相比,西班牙裔患者患人类免疫缺陷病毒感染(差异=0.2%)和器官移植史(差异=0.2%)的患病率更高。与年轻患者相比,老年人患有非肿瘤疾病的患病率更高。与男性、白人或非西班牙裔患者相比,女性、黑人或西班牙裔患者更有可能遇到护理障碍,包括儿童保育和交通问题,并且生活在社会经济条件更差的地区。

结论

严格的CCT资格标准和健康的社会决定因素可能构成结构性障碍,对患者多样性产生不成比例的影响。研究人员应利用真实世界数据来设计适当的试验资格标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66b2/12263167/18a30156d945/nihms-2092481-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66b2/12263167/f6ddd572e2cd/nihms-2092481-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66b2/12263167/b96b2a317bd6/nihms-2092481-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66b2/12263167/bcd6be143ac9/nihms-2092481-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66b2/12263167/18a30156d945/nihms-2092481-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66b2/12263167/f6ddd572e2cd/nihms-2092481-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66b2/12263167/b96b2a317bd6/nihms-2092481-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66b2/12263167/bcd6be143ac9/nihms-2092481-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66b2/12263167/18a30156d945/nihms-2092481-f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
An examination of factors associated with disparities in clinical trial eligibility guided by the Socioecological Model.一项以社会生态模型为指导,对与临床试验资格差异相关因素的考察。
Cancer. 2025 Jul 1;131(13):e35944. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35944.
2
Are Detailed, Patient-level Social Determinant of Health Factors Associated With Physical Function and Mental Health at Presentation Among New Patients With Orthopaedic Conditions?详细的患者层面的健康社会决定因素是否与新骨科患者就诊时的身体功能和心理健康相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 May 1;481(5):912-921. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002446. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
3
Racial and ethnic disparities in fecundability: a North American preconception cohort study.生育力方面的种族和族裔差异:一项北美孕前队列研究。
Hum Reprod. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf067.
4
Individual- and Group-Level Disparities Between Racial and Ethnic Groups in Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility Criteria.肺癌筛查资格标准中种族和族裔群体在个体及群体层面的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e252172. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.2172.
5
Racial and Ethnic Minorities Underrepresented in Pain Management Guidelines for Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis.在全膝关节置换术疼痛管理指南中代表性不足的少数族裔:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1698-1706. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003026. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
6
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care Use and Access Associated With Loss of Medicaid Supplemental Insurance Eligibility Above the Federal Poverty Level.医疗保健使用和获得方面的种族和族裔差异与超过联邦贫困水平的医疗补助补充保险资格丧失有关。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Jun 1;183(6):534-543. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.0512.
7
Transfusion thresholds for guiding red blood cell transfusion.输血阈值指导红细胞输血。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 21;12(12):CD002042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002042.pub5.
8
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
9
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
10
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Prehabilitation to improve function after autologous stem cell transplantation: A pilot randomized controlled trial (PIRATE).自体干细胞移植后进行预康复以改善功能:一项试点随机对照试验(PIRATE)。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Feb 7;33(3):164. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09179-1.
2
Prognostic impact of a 3-week multimodal prehabilitation program on frail elderly patients undergoing elective gastric cancer surgery: a randomized trial.3 周多模式预康复方案对行择期胃癌手术的虚弱老年患者预后的影响:一项随机试验。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Nov 11;24(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03490-7.
3
Barriers to cancer treatment for people experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage in high-income countries: a scoping review.
高收入国家中社会经济处于不利地位的人群在癌症治疗上面临的障碍:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 28;24(1):670. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11129-2.
4
Evidence of questionable research practices in clinical prediction models.临床预测模型中存在可疑研究行为的证据。
BMC Med. 2023 Sep 4;21(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03048-6.
5
Examining disparities in large-scale patient-reported data capture using digital tools among cancer patients at clinical intake.利用数字工具在癌症患者临床入组时大规模采集患者报告数据,考察其中的差异。
Cancer Med. 2023 Sep;12(18):19033-19046. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6459. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
6
Use, variability, and justification of eligibility criteria for phase II and III clinical trials in acute leukemia.在急性白血病的 II 期和 III 期临床试验中,使用、可变性和资格标准的合理性。
Haematologica. 2024 Apr 1;109(4):1046-1052. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2023.283723.
7
Racial and Ethnic Inequities in US Oncology Clinical Trial Participation From 2017 to 2022.2017 年至 2022 年美国肿瘤学临床试验参与中的种族和民族不平等。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2322515. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.22515.
8
Eligibility criteria and enrollment of a diverse racial and ethnic population in multiple myeloma clinical trials.多发性骨髓瘤临床试验中不同种族和民族人群的入选标准和纳入情况。
Blood. 2023 Jul 20;142(3):235-243. doi: 10.1182/blood.2022018657.
9
Pragmatica-Lung Trial to Mimic "Real-World" Conditions.模仿“真实世界”条件的 Pragmatica-Lung 试验。
Cancer Discov. 2023 Jun 2;13(6):1279-1280. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-NB2023-0031.
10
Racial/Ethnic and Sex Differences in Somatic Cancer Gene Mutations among Patients with Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.早发性结直肠癌患者体细胞癌症基因突变的种族/民族和性别差异。
Cancer Discov. 2023 Mar 1;13(3):570-579. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-22-0764.