Kim Edward S, Bruinooge Suanna S, Roberts Samantha, Ison Gwynn, Lin Nancy U, Gore Lia, Uldrick Thomas S, Lichtman Stuart M, Roach Nancy, Beaver Julia A, Sridhara Rajeshwari, Hesketh Paul J, Denicoff Andrea M, Garrett-Mayer Elizabeth, Rubin Eric, Multani Pratik, Prowell Tatiana M, Schenkel Caroline, Kozak Marina, Allen Jeff, Sigal Ellen, Schilsky Richard L
Edward S. Kim, Levine Cancer Institute, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC; Suanna S. Bruinooge, Caroline Schenkel, and Richard L. Schilsky, ASCO, Alexandria, VA; Samantha Roberts, Marina Kozak, Jeff Allen, and Ellen Sigal, Friends of Cancer Research; Samantha Roberts, Genentech, Washington, DC; Gwynn Ison, Julia A. Beaver, Rajeshwari Sridhara, and Tatiana M. Prowell, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring; Thomas S. Uldrick and Andrea M. Denicoff, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Nancy U. Lin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Paul J. Hesketh, Lahey Health Cancer Institute, Burlington, MA; Lia Gore, University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO; Stuart M. Lichtman, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Nancy Roach, Fight Colorectal Cancer, Springfield, MO; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer, Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; Eric Rubin, Merck Research Laboratories, Kenilworth, NJ; and Pratik Multani, Ignyta, San Diego, CA.
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 20;35(33):3737-3744. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.7916. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
Purpose The primary purposes of eligibility criteria are to protect the safety of trial participants and define the trial population. Excessive or overly restrictive eligibility criteria can slow trial accrual, jeopardize the generalizability of results, and limit understanding of the intervention's benefit-risk profile. Methods ASCO, Friends of Cancer Research, and the US Food and Drug Administration examined specific eligibility criteria (ie, brain metastases, minimum age, HIV infection, and organ dysfunction and prior and concurrent malignancies) to determine whether to modify definitions to extend trials to a broader population. Working groups developed consensus recommendations based on review of evidence, consideration of the patient population, and consultation with the research community. Results Patients with treated or clinically stable brain metastases should be routinely included in trials and only excluded if there is compelling rationale. In initial dose-finding trials, pediatric-specific cohorts should be included based on strong scientific rationale for benefit. Later phase trials in diseases that span adult and pediatric populations should include patients older than age 12 years. HIV-infected patients who are healthy and have low risk of AIDS-related outcomes should be included absent specific rationale for exclusion. Renal function criteria should enable liberal creatinine clearance, unless the investigational agent involves renal excretion. Patients with prior or concurrent malignancies should be included, especially when the risk of the malignancy interfering with either safety or efficacy endpoints is very low. Conclusion To maximize generalizability of results, trial enrollment criteria should strive for inclusiveness. Rationale for excluding patients should be clearly articulated and reflect expected toxicities associated with the therapy under investigation.
目的 资格标准的主要目的是保护试验参与者的安全并界定试验人群。过度或过于严格的资格标准会减缓试验入组速度,危及结果的可推广性,并限制对干预措施效益风险概况的理解。方法 美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)、癌症研究之友组织和美国食品药品监督管理局研究了特定的资格标准(即脑转移、最低年龄、HIV感染、器官功能障碍以及既往和同时存在的恶性肿瘤),以确定是否修改定义,将试验扩展至更广泛的人群。各工作组在审查证据、考虑患者群体并与研究界协商的基础上制定了共识性建议。结果 接受过治疗或临床稳定的脑转移患者应常规纳入试验,只有在有令人信服的理由时才予以排除。在初始剂量探索试验中,应基于有力的科学获益依据纳入特定的儿科队列。在涵盖成人和儿科人群的疾病的后期试验中,应纳入12岁以上的患者。健康且艾滋病相关结局风险较低的HIV感染患者,若无特定排除理由应予以纳入。除非研究药物涉及经肾排泄,肾功能标准应允许肌酐清除率放宽。既往或同时患有恶性肿瘤的患者应予以纳入,尤其是当恶性肿瘤干扰安全性或疗效终点的风险非常低时。结论 为使结果的可推广性最大化,试验入组标准应力求包容性。排除患者的理由应明确阐述,并反映与所研究治疗相关的预期毒性。