Suppr超能文献

尸体解剖与自制模型:教授经内镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术的最佳方法是什么?

Cadaveric Dissection vs Homemade Model: What is the Best Way to Teach Endoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair?

机构信息

Division of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Division of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

J Surg Educ. 2018 May-Jun;75(3):787-791. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Sep 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP-IHR) requires practice and training to perform well. We developed a simple, low-cost, inanimate model to teach surgical residents inguinal anatomy and the technique of mesh insertion for a safe, endoscopic TEP-IHR. The objective of this study was to compare our model vs cadaveric dissection for teaching anatomy and mesh insertion.

METHODS

A total of 14 general surgery residents participated in an institutional review board approved, prospective, and randomized study. Participants received a timed, web-based, interactive pretest assessing relevant anatomy and operative-based techniques. They then performed endoscopic TEP-IHRs on either a cadaver or our low-cost model. Participants then received a timed, web-based interactive posttest consisting of the same questions. Participants were surveyed anonymously regarding the degree to which either the model or the cadaver was educationally effective.

RESULTS

Both groups of trainees (cadaver = 7, low-cost model = 7) scored higher on the posttest (p<0.05) with similar improvement (cadaver group: pretest = 78% correct, posttest = 87%; low-cost model group: 77% vs 86%). Survey results revealed the trainees preferred for both initial learning and understanding of mesh placement using low-cost models (5 out of 5, 4.8/5, respectively) over cadavers (4.0/5, 3.8/5, respectively; p<0.05). Trainees preferred the cadaver (4.7) over the low-cost model (3.9, p<0.05) in overall experience. No differences were found in the trainees' preference between the cadaver (4.5) and low-cost model (4.7) in the overall educational value.

CONCLUSION

While the overall educational experience of 14 learners favored a cadaver experience to learn TEP-IHR, initial anatomical learning and placing the mesh was better with an inanimate model. Given the educational value of the 2 methods was equivalent, the $1500 cost for cadavers make the inexpensive and repeatable inanimate model an attractive early resource for learning TEP-IHR.

摘要

背景

经内镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术(TEP-IHR)需要实践和培训才能熟练掌握。我们开发了一种简单、低成本、无生命的模型,用于教授外科住院医师腹股沟解剖结构和安全、内镜 TEP-IHR 中网片插入的技术。本研究的目的是比较我们的模型与尸体解剖在教授解剖结构和网片插入方面的效果。

方法

共有 14 名普通外科住院医师参加了一项机构审查委员会批准的前瞻性随机研究。参与者接受了一项基于时间的、基于网络的、互动式的预测试,评估相关解剖结构和手术技术。然后,他们在尸体或我们的低成本模型上进行内镜 TEP-IHR。参与者随后接受了一项基于时间的、基于网络的互动式后测试,其中包含相同的问题。参与者匿名调查了模型或尸体在教育方面的有效性。

结果

两组受训者(尸体组=7 人,低成本模型组=7 人)在后测中得分更高(p<0.05),且提高程度相似(尸体组:预测试正确率为 78%,后测试正确率为 87%;低成本模型组:预测试正确率为 77%,后测试正确率为 86%)。调查结果显示,受训者更喜欢使用低成本模型进行初始学习和理解网片放置(5 分中的 5 分,分别为 4.8/5 和 4.0/5),而不是尸体(4.0/5 和 3.8/5)(p<0.05)。在总体体验方面,受训者更喜欢尸体(4.7)而不是低成本模型(3.9,p<0.05)。在整体教育价值方面,受训者在尸体(4.5)和低成本模型(4.7)之间的偏好没有差异。

结论

尽管 14 名学习者的整体教育体验倾向于使用尸体来学习 TEP-IHR,但使用无生命模型进行初始解剖学习和放置网片效果更好。鉴于这两种方法的教育价值相当,尸体的成本为 1500 美元,因此低成本、可重复使用的无生命模型是学习 TEP-IHR 的一种有吸引力的早期资源。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验