Suppr超能文献

股骨近端髓内钉(PFN)取出后的静态弯曲试验 - 分析

Static bending test after proximal femoral nail (PFN) removal - analysis.

作者信息

Paiva Leonardo Morais, Macedo Neto Sílvio Leite de, Souto Diogo Ranier de Macedo, Ferreira George Neri Barros, Costa Hélio Ismael da, Freitas Anderson

机构信息

Hospital Ortopédico e Medicina Especializada (HOME), Serviço de Quadril, Brasília, DF, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Ortop. 2017 Aug 30;52(Suppl 1):52-56. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2017.01.008. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate, through biomechanical testing, the resistance to and energy required for the occurrence of proximal femoral fracture in synthetic bone after removal of a proximal femoral nail model (PFN), comparing the results obtained with a reinforcement technique using polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA).

METHODS

Fifteen synthetic bones were used: five units for the control group (CG), five for the test group without reinforcement (TGNR), and five for the test group with reinforcement (TGR). The biomechanical analysis was performed simulating a fall on the trochanter using a servo-hydraulic machine. In the GC, the assay was performed with the PFN intact. In the TGNR and TGR groups, a model of PFN was introduced and the tests were performed in the TGNR, after simple removal of the synthesis material, and in the TGR, after removal of the same PFN model and filling of the cavity in the femoral neck with PMMA.

RESULTS

All groups presented a basicervical fracture. The CG presented a mean of 1427.39 Newtons (N) of maximum load and 10.14 Joules (J) of energy for the occurrence of the fracture. The TGNR and TGR presented 892.14 N and 1477.80 N of maximum load, and 6.71 J and 11.99 J of energy, respectively. According to the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA, there was a significant difference in the maximum load ( = 0.009) and energy ( = 0.007) between these groups.

CONCLUSION

The simple removal of a PFN in synthetic bone showed a significant reduction of the maximum load and energy for the occurrence of fracture, which were re-established with a reinforcement technique using PMMA.

摘要

目的

通过生物力学测试,评估在移除股骨近端钉模型(PFN)后,合成骨中股骨近端骨折发生的抵抗力和所需能量,并将所得结果与使用聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)的强化技术进行比较。

方法

使用15个合成骨:5个作为对照组(CG),5个作为未强化测试组(TGNR),5个作为强化测试组(TGR)。使用伺服液压机模拟转子处跌倒进行生物力学分析。在CG组中,PFN完整时进行测定。在TGNR组和TGR组中,引入PFN模型,TGNR组在简单移除合成材料后进行测试,TGR组在移除相同的PFN模型并用PMMA填充股骨颈腔后进行测试。

结果

所有组均出现股骨颈基底骨折。CG组骨折发生时的最大负荷平均为1427.39牛顿(N),能量为10.14焦耳(J)。TGNR组和TGR组的最大负荷分别为892.14 N和1477.80 N,能量分别为6.71 J和11.99 J。根据Kruskal-Wallis方差分析,这些组之间的最大负荷(P = 0.009)和能量(P = 0.007)存在显著差异。

结论

在合成骨中简单移除PFN显示骨折发生时的最大负荷和能量显著降低,而使用PMMA的强化技术可使其恢复。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d48b/5620003/5db5f0dd0f6c/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Static bending test after proximal femoral nail (PFN) removal - analysis.
Rev Bras Ortop. 2017 Aug 30;52(Suppl 1):52-56. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2017.01.008. eCollection 2017.
2
Biomechanical Test Following Removal of a Dynamic Hip Screw: In Vitro Analysis.
Cureus. 2018 Dec 4;10(12):e3680. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3680.
3
Biomechanical Test after Hip Cannulated Screw Removal (in vitro Analysis).
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2019 Jul;54(4):416-421. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1693046. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
5
Mechanical Analysis after Proximal Femoral Reinforcement with Polymethylmethacrylate in Alternated Double Holes.
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2020 Sep 25;56(5):641-646. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714221. eCollection 2021 Oct.
6
PRELIMINARY MECHANICAL TEST OF PROXIMAL FEMUR REINFORCEMENT WITH CEMENTED X-SHAPED PMMA.
Acta Ortop Bras. 2018;26(4):231-235. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220182604187691.
8
Comparison of radiological and functional outcome of unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures treated using PFN and PFNA-2 in patients with osteoporosis.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019 Jul;29(5):1035-1042. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02401-x. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
9
Comparative prospective study of proximal femoral nail and dynamic hip screw in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture femur.
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2012 Jun;3(1):28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2011.12.001. Epub 2012 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

2
Biomechanical Test after Hip Cannulated Screw Removal (in vitro Analysis).
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2019 Jul;54(4):416-421. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1693046. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
3
Biomechanical Test Following Removal of a Dynamic Hip Screw: In Vitro Analysis.
Cureus. 2018 Dec 4;10(12):e3680. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3680.

本文引用的文献

1
The Analysis of Biomechanical Properties of Proximal Femur after Implant Removal.
Appl Bionics Biomech. 2016;2016:4987831. doi: 10.1155/2016/4987831. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
2
Subject-specific planning of femoroplasty: an experimental verification study.
J Biomech. 2015 Jan 2;48(1):59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
3
Limited V-shaped cement augmentation of the proximal femur to prevent secondary hip fractures.
J Biomater Appl. 2013 Jul;28(1):136-43. doi: 10.1177/0885328212443274. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
4
Should extramedullary fixations for hip fractures be removed after bone union?
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2011 May;26(4):410-4. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.12.002. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
5
Calcium phosphate cement augmentation of the femoral neck defect created after dynamic hip screw removal.
J Orthop Trauma. 2007 May;21(5):295-300. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3180616ba5.
7
Finite element study of the proximal femur with retained trochanteric gamma nail and after removal of nail.
Injury. 2006 Aug;37(8):778-85. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.01.019. Epub 2006 Feb 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验