Kröger H, Kettunen J, Bowditch M, Joukainen J, Suomalainen O, Alhava E
Department of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.
J Orthop Sci. 2002;7(3):325-30. doi: 10.1007/s007760200055.
We measured bone mineral density (BMD) using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at several sites in both fractured and nonfractured limbs in eight patients with femoral shaft fracture and six with tibial shaft fracture at the time of the intramedullary (IM) nail removal. Seven patients were followed up for an average of 13 months. The BMD at the proximal part of the femur and tibia was from 3% to 11% lower in the fractured side as compared to the nonfractured side. The greatest bone loss (13%-21%) was found in the operated distal tibia of the patients with tibial shaft fractures. At the fracture site of the femur, BMD was 10.5% ( P < 0.05) higher, possibly owing to fracture callus formation, whereas tibial shaft BMD was not increased. However, a calculated apparent volumetric BMDvol at the fracture site was 15%-16% decreased. Although BMDs of the fractured side almost reached the baseline level of the nonfractured side (96.9%-102.1%) by the final follow-up (>12 months), the absolute deficit was still 3%-9%. Surprisingly, significant BMD increases (5%-6%) were also detected in all proximal femoral measurement sites of the contralateral limb, which indirectly suggests that the uninjured limb may also suffer from bone loss after lower-extremity trauma. We conclude that clinically important bone loss exists in the proximal femur and proximal and distal tibia of the fractured limb at the time of IM nail removal. Although areal BMD was higher at the femoral fracture site, the lower apparent volumetric BMDvol suggests decreased mineralization and reduced strength of the fracture site. Although the present results do not suggest special recommendations for restricted weight bearing after the removal of IM nails, the relationship between decreased bone density and increased risk of fractures should be borne in mind.
我们在8例股骨干骨折和6例胫骨干骨折患者取出髓内钉时,使用双能X线吸收法(DXA)测量了骨折和未骨折肢体多个部位的骨密度(BMD)。7例患者接受了平均13个月的随访。与未骨折侧相比,骨折侧股骨近端和胫骨近端的骨密度降低了3%至11%。在胫骨干骨折患者手术侧的胫骨远端发现了最大的骨量丢失(13% - 21%)。在股骨骨折部位,骨密度高出10.5%(P < 0.05),可能是由于骨折骨痂形成,而胫骨干骨密度并未增加。然而,骨折部位计算得出的表观体积骨密度(BMDvol)降低了15% - 16%。尽管到最终随访(>12个月)时骨折侧的骨密度几乎达到了未骨折侧的基线水平(96.9% - 102.1%),但绝对差值仍为3% - 9%。令人惊讶的是,在对侧肢体所有股骨近端测量部位也检测到骨密度显著增加(5% - 6%),这间接表明下肢创伤后未受伤的肢体也可能出现骨量丢失。我们得出结论,在取出髓内钉时,骨折肢体的股骨近端、胫骨近端和远端存在具有临床意义的骨量丢失。尽管股骨骨折部位的面骨密度较高,但较低的表观体积骨密度表明骨折部位矿化减少且强度降低。尽管目前的结果并未针对取出髓内钉后限制负重提出特别建议,但应牢记骨密度降低与骨折风险增加之间的关系。