Zaman Junaid A B, Baykaner Tina, Schricker Amir A, Krummen David E, Narayan Sanjiv M
Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Imperial College, University of London, United Kingdom.
Glob Cardiol Sci Pract. 2017 Mar 31;2017(1):e201707. doi: 10.21542/gcsp.2017.7.
The mechanisms responsible for sustaining atrial fibrillation are a key debate in cardiovascular pathophysiology, and directly influence the approach to therapy including ablation Clinical and basic studies have split AF mechanisms into two basic camps: 'spatially distributed disorganization' and 'localized sources'. Recent data suggest that these mechanisms can also be separated by the method for mapping - with nearly all traditional electrogram analyses showing spatially distributed disorganization and nearly all optical mapping studies showing localized sources We will review this dichotomy in light of these recently identified differences in mapping, and in the context of recent clinical studies in which localized ablation has been shown to impact AF, also lending support to the localized source hypothesis. We will conclude with other concepts on mechanism-based ablation and areas of ongoing research that must be addressed to continue improving our knowledge and treatment of AF.
维持心房颤动的机制是心血管病理生理学中的一个关键争论点,并且直接影响包括消融在内的治疗方法。临床和基础研究已将房颤机制分为两个基本阵营:“空间分布紊乱”和“局灶起源”。最近的数据表明,这些机制也可以通过标测方法来区分——几乎所有传统心电图分析都显示出空间分布紊乱,而几乎所有光学标测研究都显示出局灶起源。我们将根据最近在标测方面发现的这些差异,以及在最近的临床研究背景下(其中已证明局灶消融对房颤有影响,这也支持了局灶起源假说)来回顾这种二分法。我们将以基于机制的消融的其他概念以及为继续提高我们对房颤的认识和治疗水平而必须解决的正在进行的研究领域作为总结。