Suppr超能文献

不同种族的BRCA基因检测无信息的家庭对遗传性乳腺癌风险多基因检测的偏好。

Preferences for multigene panel testing for hereditary breast cancer risk among ethnically diverse BRCA-uninformative families.

作者信息

Vicuña Belinda, Delaney Harold D, Flores Kristina G, Ballinger Lori, Royce Melanie, Dayao Zoneddy, Pal Tuya, Kinney Anita Y

机构信息

Cancer Research Facility, University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of New Mexico, MSC 07 4025, Albuquerque, NM, 87125, USA.

Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.

出版信息

J Community Genet. 2018 Jan;9(1):81-92. doi: 10.1007/s12687-017-0322-8. Epub 2017 Oct 2.

Abstract

Until recently, genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer has primarily focused on pathogenic variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA) genes. However, advances in DNA sequencing technologies have made simultaneous testing for multiple genes possible. We examined correlates of interest in multigene panel testing and risk communication preferences in an ethnically diverse sample of women who tested negative for BRCA mutations previously but remain at high risk based on their family history (referred to as "BRCA-uninformative") and their at-risk female family members. Two-hundred and thirteen women with a previous breast cancer diagnosis and a BRCA-uninformative test result and their first-degree relatives completed a survey on interest in multigene panel testing, communication preferences, and sociodemographic, psychological, and clinical factors. Stepwise logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with testing interest. Chi-square analyses were used to test differences in risk communication preferences. Interest in multigene panel testing was high (84%) and did not considerably differ by cancer status or ethnicity. In multivariable analysis, factors significantly associated with interest in genetic testing were having had a mammogram in the past 2 years (odds ratio (OR) = 4.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.80-9.02) and high cancer worry (OR = 3.77, 95% CI 1.34-10.60). Overall, the most commonly preferred genetic communication modes were genetic counselors, oncologists, and print materials. However, non-Hispanic women were more likely than Hispanic women to prefer web-based risk communication (p < 0.001). Hispanic and non-Hispanic women from BRCA-uninformative families have a high level of interest in gene panel testing. Cancer-related emotions and communication preferences should be considered in developing targeted genetic risk communication strategies.

摘要

直到最近,遗传性乳腺癌的基因检测主要集中在BRCA1和BRCA2(BRCA)基因的致病变异上。然而,DNA测序技术的进步使得同时检测多个基因成为可能。我们在一个种族多样化的女性样本中,研究了对多基因检测的兴趣相关性以及风险沟通偏好。这些女性之前BRCA突变检测为阴性,但根据家族史仍处于高风险(称为“BRCA无信息”),以及她们的高危女性家庭成员。213名曾被诊断为乳腺癌且BRCA检测无信息的女性及其一级亲属完成了一项关于多基因检测兴趣、沟通偏好以及社会人口学、心理和临床因素的调查。采用逐步逻辑回归来确定与检测兴趣相关的因素。使用卡方分析来检验风险沟通偏好的差异。对多基因检测的兴趣很高(84%),且在癌症状态或种族方面没有显著差异。在多变量分析中,与基因检测兴趣显著相关的因素是在过去2年进行过乳房X光检查(优势比(OR)=4.04,95%置信区间(CI)1.80 - 9.02)和高癌症担忧程度(OR = 3.77,95% CI 1.34 - 10.60)。总体而言,最常偏好的基因沟通方式是遗传咨询师、肿瘤学家和印刷材料。然而,非西班牙裔女性比西班牙裔女性更倾向于基于网络的风险沟通(p < 0.001)。来自BRCA无信息家庭的西班牙裔和非西班牙裔女性对基因检测有很高的兴趣。在制定有针对性的遗传风险沟通策略时,应考虑与癌症相关的情绪和沟通偏好。

相似文献

1
Preferences for multigene panel testing for hereditary breast cancer risk among ethnically diverse BRCA-uninformative families.
J Community Genet. 2018 Jan;9(1):81-92. doi: 10.1007/s12687-017-0322-8. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
2
Factors Associated with Interest in Gene-Panel Testing and Risk Communication Preferences in Women from BRCA1/2 Negative Families.
J Genet Couns. 2017 Jun;26(3):480-490. doi: 10.1007/s10897-016-0001-7. Epub 2016 Aug 6.
4
Prevalence of mutations in a diverse cohort of 3162 women tested via the same multigene cancer panel in a managed care health plan.
J Community Genet. 2020 Jul;11(3):359-366. doi: 10.1007/s12687-020-00456-6. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
7
Communication of BRCA results and family testing in 1,103 high-risk women.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Sep;19(9):2211-9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0325. Epub 2010 Aug 10.
8
BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in Japanese women with ductal carcinoma in situ.
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2019 Mar;7(3):e493. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.493. Epub 2019 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

3
Latinx attitudes, barriers, and experiences with genetic counseling and testing: A systematic review.
J Genet Couns. 2023 Feb;32(1):166-181. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1632. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
4
Outcomes of retesting in patients with previously uninformative cancer genetics evaluations.
Fam Cancer. 2022 Jul;21(3):375-385. doi: 10.1007/s10689-021-00276-8. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
6
Acceptability and outcomes of multigene panel testing among young Black breast cancer survivors.
Breast J. 2020 Oct;26(10):2112-2114. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13848. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
8
Horizon Scan Of Clinical Laboratories Offering Pharmacogenetic Testing.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 May;37(5):717-723. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1564.

本文引用的文献

1
Genomic Disparities in Breast Cancer Among Latinas.
Cancer Control. 2016 Oct;23(4):359-372. doi: 10.1177/107327481602300407.
2
Revisiting breast cancer patients who previously tested negative for BRCA mutations using a 12-gene panel.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jan;161(1):135-142. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-4038-y. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
3
Factors Associated with Interest in Gene-Panel Testing and Risk Communication Preferences in Women from BRCA1/2 Negative Families.
J Genet Couns. 2017 Jun;26(3):480-490. doi: 10.1007/s10897-016-0001-7. Epub 2016 Aug 6.
5
Counselling framework for moderate-penetrance cancer-susceptibility mutations.
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep;13(9):581-8. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.90. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
7
Genetic Testing Awareness and Attitudes among Latinos: Exploring Shared Perceptions and Gender-Based Differences.
Public Health Genomics. 2016;19(1):34-46. doi: 10.1159/000441552. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
8
More genes, more problems? Benefits and risks of multiplex genetic testing.
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Nov;139(2):209-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.10.013.
9
Clinical Application of Multigene Panels: Challenges of Next-Generation Counseling and Cancer Risk Management.
Front Oncol. 2015 Sep 29;5:208. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00208. eCollection 2015.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验