• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

向新生儿父母传授预防中毒策略的初步评估。

Pilot evaluation of instructing parents of newborns about poison prevention strategies.

作者信息

Cooper J M, Widness J A, O'Shea J S

机构信息

Division of Ambulatory Pediatrics, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence.

出版信息

Am J Dis Child. 1988 Jun;142(6):627-9. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1988.02150060061031.

DOI:10.1001/archpedi.1988.02150060061031
PMID:2897157
Abstract

Providing new parents with both written and verbal information about poisons and with syrup of ipecac appeared to be successful when distributed at discharge of their normal newborns. New parents who received neither information nor ipecac served as controls. Distribution occurred during a nine-month period, which was followed after an interval of three months by a four-month evaluation period. The average (+/- SD) time between infant poison exposures and parent telephone calls to the statewide poison center during the evaluation period was 5 +/- 3 minutes for the subjects and 12 +/- 4 for age-matched and socioeconomically matched controls. Both groups had similar frequencies of potentially dangerous exposures for which syrup of ipecac was recommended. Subject parents appeared to have homes which in various respects were significantly more child-safe than those of the controls. Significantly more control homes contained syrup of ipecac after the exposures than before (77% vs 41%).

摘要

在正常新生儿出院时,为新生儿父母提供有关中毒的书面和口头信息以及吐根糖浆,似乎是成功的。未接受任何信息和吐根糖浆的新生儿父母作为对照组。分发工作在九个月期间进行,三个月后进入为期四个月的评估期。在评估期内,婴儿接触毒物与父母致电全州毒物中心之间的平均(±标准差)时间,研究对象为5±3分钟,年龄和社会经济状况匹配的对照组为12±4分钟。两组中建议使用吐根糖浆的潜在危险接触频率相似。研究对象的家庭在各个方面似乎都比对照组的家庭对儿童更安全。接触毒物后,对照组家庭中含有吐根糖浆的比例显著高于接触前(77%对41%)。

相似文献

1
Pilot evaluation of instructing parents of newborns about poison prevention strategies.向新生儿父母传授预防中毒策略的初步评估。
Am J Dis Child. 1988 Jun;142(6):627-9. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1988.02150060061031.
2
A poison prevention program for new mothers.针对新妈妈的预防中毒计划。
Vet Hum Toxicol. 1985 Dec;27(6):517-8.
3
Poison exposures and use of ipecac in children less than 1 year old.
Ann Emerg Med. 1986 Jul;15(7):808-10. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(86)80378-x.
4
Syrup of ipecac. The case for distribution from physicians' offices.吐根糖浆。从医生办公室分发的情况。
Am J Dis Child. 1988 Jun;142(6):640-2. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1988.02150060074036.
5
Syrup of ipecac availability: before and after a poisoning.
Vet Hum Toxicol. 1986 Feb;28(1):65-6.
6
Evaluation of a community-based poison education program.一项基于社区的中毒教育项目评估。
Clin Toxicol. 1978 Dec;13(5):623-9. doi: 10.3109/15563657808988267.
7
Risk assessment of ipecac in the home.家庭中吐根糖浆的风险评估。
Pediatrics. 1985 Jun;75(6):1105-9.
8
Cooperative regional program for distribution of poison prevention information and syrup of ipecac.毒物预防信息与吐根糖浆分发合作区域项目
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1989 Apr;46(4):719-23.
9
Prevention of childhood poisoning: efficacy of an educational program carried out in an emergency clinic.儿童中毒的预防:在急诊诊所开展的一项教育项目的效果
Pediatrics. 1987 Sep;80(3):359-63.
10
Toxic exposures and ingestions in Honolulu: I. A prospective pediatric ED cohort; II. A prospective poison center cohort.檀香山的有毒物质暴露与摄入情况:一、儿科急诊前瞻性队列研究;二、中毒控制中心前瞻性队列研究。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 1991 Jun;7(3):141-8. doi: 10.1097/00006565-199106000-00003.

引用本文的文献

1
Home safety education and provision of safety equipment for injury prevention.居家安全教育及提供预防伤害的安全设备。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD005014. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005014.pub3.
2
Evaluation of a poison prevention lesson for kindergarten and third grade students.针对幼儿园和三年级学生的预防中毒课程评估。
Inj Prev. 1998 Sep;4(3):218-21. doi: 10.1136/ip.4.3.218.