• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用协同设计来开发干预措施,以满足住院患者的健康素养需求。

Using co-design to develop interventions to address health literacy needs in a hospitalised population.

作者信息

Jessup Rebecca L, Osborne Richard H, Buchbinder Rachelle, Beauchamp Alison

机构信息

Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Melbourne, Australia.

Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 20;18(1):989. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3801-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-018-3801-7
PMID:30572887
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6302392/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health literacy describes the cognitive and social skills which determine the motivation and ability of individuals to gain access to, understand and use information in ways which promote and maintain good health. Suboptimal health literacy is common and is believed to impact up to 60% of Australians. Co-design is a participatory approach to the development of interventions that brings together to staff and patients to design local solutions to local problems. The aim of this study is to describe a staff and patient co-design process that will lead to the development of health literacy interventions in response to identified health literacy needs of hospital patients.

METHODS

A mixed methods, two-step sequential explanatory design. Step 1: hospitalised patients surveyed and data analysed using hierarchical cluster analysis to establish health literacy profiles. Step 2: clusters presented as vignettes to patients and clinicians to co-design interventions to address needs.

RESULTS

Eight health literacy clusters were identified from surveys. Seven patients attended two patient workshops and 23 staff attended two staff workshops. Three key themes were identified: organisational, provider-patient, and patient self-care. Within these, five sub-themes emerged: "Good quality communication during hospital stay", "Social support for health", "A good discharge", "Care across the continuum" and "Accessing quality information when home". Fifteen potential interventions were produced, including changes to message design and delivery, staff training in assessing for understanding, social support to improve understanding, improving communication consistency across the care continuum, and strategic dissemination of web-based resources.

CONCLUSION

This study identified fifteen strategies to address health literacy needs of a hospital population. Implementation and evaluation will identify sets of strategies that have the maximum patient, clinician and organisational benefit. This approach allows for the development of locally-driven, contextually-appropriate interventions to address health literacy needs.

摘要

背景

健康素养描述的是认知和社交技能,这些技能决定了个体以促进和维持良好健康的方式获取、理解和使用信息的动机和能力。健康素养欠佳的情况很常见,据信影响多达60%的澳大利亚人。共同设计是一种参与式干预开发方法,它将工作人员和患者聚集在一起,为当地问题设计本地化解决方案。本研究的目的是描述一个工作人员与患者共同设计的过程,该过程将促成开发健康素养干预措施,以应对已确定的医院患者健康素养需求。

方法

采用混合方法、两步序贯解释性设计。步骤1:对住院患者进行调查,并使用分层聚类分析对数据进行分析,以建立健康素养概况。步骤2:将聚类以案例的形式呈现给患者和临床医生,共同设计干预措施以满足需求。

结果

通过调查确定了八个健康素养聚类。七名患者参加了两次患者研讨会,23名工作人员参加了两次工作人员研讨会。确定了三个关键主题:组织、医患关系和患者自我护理。在这些主题中,出现了五个子主题:“住院期间的高质量沟通”、“健康的社会支持”、“良好的出院安排”、“连续护理”和“在家时获取优质信息”。制定了15项潜在干预措施,包括改变信息设计和传递方式、工作人员评估理解能力的培训、改善理解的社会支持、提高整个护理连续过程中的沟通一致性,以及基于网络资源的战略传播。

结论

本研究确定了15项策略来满足医院患者的健康素养需求。实施和评估将确定能使患者、临床医生和组织获得最大益处的策略组合。这种方法有助于开发由当地驱动、因地制宜的干预措施,以满足健康素养需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b080/6302392/c18fb4d8f541/12913_2018_3801_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b080/6302392/82989299d605/12913_2018_3801_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b080/6302392/4090da321027/12913_2018_3801_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b080/6302392/c18fb4d8f541/12913_2018_3801_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b080/6302392/82989299d605/12913_2018_3801_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b080/6302392/4090da321027/12913_2018_3801_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b080/6302392/c18fb4d8f541/12913_2018_3801_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Using co-design to develop interventions to address health literacy needs in a hospitalised population.运用协同设计来开发干预措施,以满足住院患者的健康素养需求。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 20;18(1):989. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3801-7.
2
Systematic development and implementation of interventions to OPtimise Health Literacy and Access (Ophelia).优化健康素养与可及性干预措施的系统开发与实施(奥菲莉亚)。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Mar 3;17(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4147-5.
3
Health Literacy Co-Design in a Low Resource Setting: Harnessing Local Wisdom to Inform Interventions across Fishing Villages in Egypt to Improve Health and Equity.健康素养共同设计在资源匮乏环境下的应用:利用本土智慧为埃及渔村的干预措施提供信息,以改善健康和公平状况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 24;18(9):4518. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094518.
4
Co-designing eHealth and Equity Solutions: Application of the Ophelia (Optimizing Health Literacy and Access) Process.共同设计电子健康和公平解决方案:奥菲莉亚(优化健康素养和获取)过程的应用。
Front Public Health. 2020 Nov 20;8:604401. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.604401. eCollection 2020.
5
Codesign and implementation of an equity-promoting national health literacy programme for people living with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): a protocol for the application of the Optimising Health Literacy and Access (Ophelia) process.促进炎症性肠病患者公平获取健康素养国家项目的设计与实施:应用优化健康素养和获取(Ophelia)流程的方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 26;11(8):e045059. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045059.
6
How can communities and organisations improve their health literacy?社区和组织如何提高其健康素养?
Public Health Res Pract. 2018 Jun 14;28(2):2821809. doi: 10.17061/phrp2821809.
7
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
8
Health literacy profile of recently hospitalised patients in the private hospital setting: a cross sectional survey using the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ).私立医院环境中近期住院患者的健康素养概况:一项使用健康素养问卷(HLQ)的横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 20;18(1):877. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3697-2.
9
Migrant Communities at the Center in Co-design of Health Literacy-Based Innovative Solutions for Non-communicable Diseases Prevention and Risk Reduction: Application of the OPtimising HEalth LIteracy and Access (Ophelia) Process.以移民社区为核心,共同设计基于健康素养的非传染性疾病预防和风险降低创新解决方案:优化健康素养与获取(奥菲莉亚)流程的应用
Front Public Health. 2021 May 31;9:639405. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.639405. eCollection 2021.
10
Application of the optimizing health literacy and access (Ophelia) process in partnership with a refugee community in Australia: Study protocol.与澳大利亚难民社区合作,应用优化健康素养和获取(Ophelia)流程:研究方案。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 21;11:1112538. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1112538. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Literacy Gaps Across Language Groups: A Population-Based Assessment in Alto Adige/South Tyrol, Italy.不同语言群体间的健康素养差距:意大利上阿迪杰/南蒂罗尔的一项基于人群的评估。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2025 Aug 9;15(8):153. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe15080153.
2
Using Codesign to Develop a Health Literacy Intervention to Improve the Accessibility and Acceptability of Cardiac Services: The Equal Hearts Study.运用协同设计开发健康素养干预措施以提高心脏服务的可及性和可接受性:平等之心研究
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70328. doi: 10.1111/hex.70328.
3
Co-design of interventions and services with structurally marginalized populations in the context of maternal and early childhood primary care: a rapid scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Measurement properties of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) among older adults who present to the emergency department after a fall: a Rasch analysis.在因跌倒而到急诊科就诊的老年人中,健康素养问卷 (HLQ) 的测量特性:一项 Rasch 分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 29;17(1):605. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2520-9.
2
The Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) at the patient-clinician interface: a qualitative study of what patients and clinicians mean by their HLQ scores.患者-临床医生界面的健康素养问卷(HLQ):关于患者和临床医生对其HLQ评分含义的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Apr 27;17(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2254-8.
3
在孕产妇和幼儿初级保健背景下与结构上处于边缘地位的人群共同设计干预措施和服务:一项快速范围审查
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2025 Jun 16;26:e48. doi: 10.1017/S146342362510011X.
4
Systematic description of the development of a complex health intervention of information and support in a new pregnancy after pregnancy loss.对流产后再次怀孕时信息与支持这一复杂健康干预措施发展情况的系统描述。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jun 5;25(1):2097. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22163-y.
5
Co-Designing a Digital Stroke Prevention Platform: Leveraging Lived Experience and Expert Advice.共同设计一个数字中风预防平台:利用实际经验和专家建议。
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70293. doi: 10.1111/hex.70293.
6
The Impact of Breast Density Notification on Anxiety in South Australian Women Undergoing Breast Cancer Screening.乳腺密度通知对南澳大利亚州接受乳腺癌筛查女性焦虑情绪的影响。
Int J Breast Cancer. 2025 Apr 25;2025:9997077. doi: 10.1155/ijbc/9997077. eCollection 2025.
7
Development and evaluation of the patient engagement questionnaire (PEQ).患者参与度问卷(PEQ)的开发与评估。
PEC Innov. 2025 Apr 14;6:100392. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100392. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
Process evaluation of a co-design and implementation study to improve professional health literacy in a regional care hospital (PIKoG): a mixed-methods study.一项旨在提高地区护理医院专业健康素养的协同设计与实施研究(PIKoG)的过程评估:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 15;25(1):555. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12679-9.
9
Understanding the Unmet Needs of People Living with Type 2 Diabetes in Self-Managing Their Condition.了解2型糖尿病患者在自我管理病情方面未得到满足的需求。
Nutrients. 2025 Apr 2;17(7):1243. doi: 10.3390/nu17071243.
10
Applying co-design health literacy development in Australian prisons: protocol for system-wide application of the Optimising Health Literacy and Access (Ophelia) process.在澳大利亚监狱中应用共同设计的健康素养发展:优化健康素养与获取(Ophelia)流程的全系统应用方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 7;15(4):e092128. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092128.
Systematic development and implementation of interventions to OPtimise Health Literacy and Access (Ophelia).
优化健康素养与可及性干预措施的系统开发与实施(奥菲莉亚)。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Mar 3;17(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4147-5.
4
German translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ).《健康素养问卷》(HLQ)的德语翻译、文化调适及效度验证
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0172340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172340. eCollection 2017.
5
Health literacy of recently hospitalised patients: a cross-sectional survey using the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ).近期住院患者的健康素养:一项使用健康素养问卷(HLQ)的横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 19;17(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1973-6.
6
Optimising Health Literacy and Access of Service Provision to Community Dwelling Older People with Diabetes Receiving Home Nursing Support.优化社区居住的接受家庭护理支持的糖尿病老年人的健康素养及服务提供途径。
J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:2483263. doi: 10.1155/2016/2483263. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
7
Cultural adaptation and validation of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ): robust nine-dimension Danish language confirmatory factor model.健康素养问卷(HLQ)的文化适应性与效度验证:稳健的九维度丹麦语验证性因子模型
Springerplus. 2016 Aug 2;5(1):1232. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2887-9. eCollection 2016.
8
Health literacy: applying current concepts to improve health services and reduce health inequalities.健康素养:运用现有概念改善卫生服务和减少健康不平等。
Public Health. 2016 Mar;132:3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
9
Distribution of health literacy strengths and weaknesses across socio-demographic groups: a cross-sectional survey using the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ).不同社会人口群体健康素养优势与劣势的分布:一项使用健康素养问卷(HLQ)的横断面调查。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 21;15:678. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2056-z.
10
The OPtimising HEalth LIterAcy (Ophelia) process: study protocol for using health literacy profiling and community engagement to create and implement health reform.优化健康素养(奥菲莉亚)流程:运用健康素养剖析及社区参与来制定和实施健康改革的研究方案
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jul 7;14:694. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-694.