Janicki Matthew P, McCallion Philip, Splaine Michael, Santos Flavvia H, Keller Seth M, Watchman Karen
Matthew P. Janicki, University of Illinois at Chicago.
Philip McCallion, University at Albany, New York.
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2017 Oct;55(5):338-346. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-55.5.338.
A working group of the 2016 International Summit on Intellectual Disability and Dementia was charged to examine the terminology used to define and report on dementia in publications related to intellectual disability (ID). A review of related publications showed mixed uses of terms associated with dementia or causative diseases. As with dementia research in the non-ID population, language related to dementia in the ID field often lacks precision and could lead to a misunderstanding of the condition(s) under discussion, an increasingly crucial issue given the increased global attention dementia is receiving in that field. Most articles related to ID and dementia reporting clinical or medical research generally provide a structured definition of dementia or related terms; social care articles tend toward term use without definition. Toward terminology standardization within studies/reports on dementia and ID, the Summit recommended that a consistent approach is taken that ensures (a) growing familiarity with dementia-related diagnostic, condition-specific, and social care terms (as identified in the working group's report); (b) creating a guidance document on accurately defining and presenting information about individuals or groups referenced; and
2016年国际智力残疾与痴呆症峰会的一个工作小组负责审查在与智力残疾(ID)相关的出版物中用于定义和报告痴呆症的术语。对相关出版物的审查表明,与痴呆症或致病疾病相关的术语使用不一。与非智力残疾人群的痴呆症研究一样,智力残疾领域中与痴呆症相关的语言往往缺乏精确性,可能导致对所讨论病症的误解,鉴于痴呆症在该领域受到全球越来越多的关注,这一问题变得日益关键。大多数与智力残疾和痴呆症相关的文章在报告临床或医学研究时,通常会提供痴呆症或相关术语的结构化定义;社会护理文章则倾向于在未定义术语的情况下使用。为了在痴呆症和智力残疾的研究/报告中实现术语标准化,峰会建议采取一致的方法,以确保:(a)对与痴呆症相关的诊断、特定病症和社会护理术语(如工作组报告中所确定的)的熟悉程度不断提高;(b)创建一份关于准确界定和呈现所提及个人或群体信息的指导文件;以及