• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

企业间复杂网络中相互作用企业间风险传播的估计

Estimating risk propagation between interacting firms on inter-firm complex network.

作者信息

Goto Hayato, Takayasu Hideki, Takayasu Misako

机构信息

Department of Computational Intelligence and Systems Science, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 4259, Nagatsuta-cho, Yokohama 226-8502, Japan.

Institute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 4259, Nagatsuta-cho, Yokohama 226-8502, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Oct 3;12(10):e0185712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185712. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0185712
PMID:28972998
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5626445/
Abstract

We derive a stochastic function of risk propagation empirically from comprehensive data of chain-reaction bankruptcy events in Japan from 2006 to 2015 over 5,000 pairs of firms. The probability is formulated by firm interaction between the pair of firms; it is proportional to the product of α-th power of the size of the first bankrupt firm and β-th power of that of the chain-reaction bankrupt firm. We confirm that α is positive and β is negative throughout the observing period, meaning that the probability of cascading failure is higher between a larger first bankrupt firm and smaller trading firm. We additionally introduce a numerical model simulating the whole ecosystem of firms and show that the interaction kernel is a key factor to express complexities of spreading bankruptcy risks on real ecosystems.

摘要

我们从2006年至2015年日本连锁反应破产事件的综合数据中,以实证方式推导出了一个风险传播的随机函数,涉及5000多对公司。该概率由一对公司之间的公司互动来确定;它与第一家破产公司规模的α次方与连锁反应破产公司规模的β次方的乘积成正比。我们证实,在整个观察期内,α为正,β为负,这意味着在规模较大的第一家破产公司和规模较小的交易公司之间,级联故障的概率更高。我们还引入了一个模拟公司整个生态系统的数值模型,并表明相互作用核是表达真实生态系统中破产风险传播复杂性的关键因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d87c/5626445/647624378b7c/pone.0185712.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d87c/5626445/1bd040c2c489/pone.0185712.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d87c/5626445/15435fae691e/pone.0185712.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d87c/5626445/a2d6a5e330a4/pone.0185712.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d87c/5626445/771d04499119/pone.0185712.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d87c/5626445/b04e3b798b4e/pone.0185712.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d87c/5626445/647624378b7c/pone.0185712.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d87c/5626445/1bd040c2c489/pone.0185712.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d87c/5626445/15435fae691e/pone.0185712.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d87c/5626445/a2d6a5e330a4/pone.0185712.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d87c/5626445/771d04499119/pone.0185712.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d87c/5626445/b04e3b798b4e/pone.0185712.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d87c/5626445/647624378b7c/pone.0185712.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Estimating risk propagation between interacting firms on inter-firm complex network.企业间复杂网络中相互作用企业间风险传播的估计
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 3;12(10):e0185712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185712. eCollection 2017.
2
Bankruptcy risk model and empirical tests.破产风险模型与实证检验。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Oct 26;107(43):18325-30. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011942107. Epub 2010 Oct 11.
3
Propagation of negative shocks across nation-wide firm networks.全国性企业网络中负冲击的传播。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 14;14(3):e0213648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213648. eCollection 2019.
4
Predicting corporate credit risk: Network contagion via trade credit.预测企业信用风险:贸易信贷的网络传染。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 29;16(4):e0250115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250115. eCollection 2021.
5
Does patenting always help new firm survival? Understanding heterogeneity among exit routes.专利申请总能帮助新公司存活吗?理解退出途径中的异质性。
Small Bus Econ (Dordr). 2022;59(2):449-475. doi: 10.1007/s11187-021-00481-w. Epub 2021 May 25.
6
Mean field approximation for biased diffusion on Japanese inter-firm trading network.日本企业间交易网络上有偏扩散的平均场近似
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 13;9(3):e91704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091704. eCollection 2014.
7
Linking occupational accidents and construction firm survival.将职业事故与建筑公司的生存联系起来。
J Safety Res. 2023 Jun;85:485-491. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2023.05.002. Epub 2023 May 11.
8
Firm Exit during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from Japan.新冠疫情期间的企业退出:来自日本的证据。
J Jpn Int Econ. 2021 Mar;59:101118. doi: 10.1016/j.jjie.2020.101118. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
9
Does the bankrupt cheat? Impact of accounting manipulations on the effectiveness of a bankruptcy prediction.破产者是否会欺诈?会计操纵对破产预测有效性的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 17;18(1):e0280384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280384. eCollection 2023.
10
Bank-firm credit network in Japan: an analysis of a bipartite network.日本的银行-企业信贷网络:二分网络分析
PLoS One. 2015 May 1;10(5):e0123079. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123079. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Commodity-specific triads in the Dutch inter-industry production network.荷兰产业间生产网络中特定商品的三元组
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 13;14(1):3625. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53655-3.
2
Ripple effect in the supply chain network: Forward and backward disruption propagation, network health and firm vulnerability.供应链网络中的涟漪效应:前向和后向干扰传播、网络健康状况与企业脆弱性。
Eur J Oper Res. 2021 Jun 16;291(3):1117-1131. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.09.053. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
3
Multi-population genetic algorithm with ER network for solving flexible job shop scheduling problems.

本文引用的文献

1
Appearance of Unstable Monopoly State Caused by Selective and Concentrative Mergers in Business Networks.商业网络中选择性和集中性并购导致的不稳定垄断状态的出现。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 11;7(1):5064. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05362-5.
2
Distress Propagation in Complex Networks: The Case of Non-Linear DebtRank.复杂网络中的困境传播:非线性债务排名案例
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 4;11(10):e0163825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163825. eCollection 2016.
3
Universal resilience patterns in complex networks.复杂网络中的普遍恢复模式。
基于 ER 网络的多群体遗传算法求解柔性作业车间调度问题。
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233759. eCollection 2020.
4
Dynamics of essential interaction between firms on financial reports.企业财务报告中本质交互的动态。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 18;14(12):e0225853. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225853. eCollection 2019.
5
Assembling real networks from synthetic and unstructured subsets: the corporate reporting case.从合成和非结构化子集组装真实网络:公司报告案例。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 30;9(1):11075. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47490-0.
6
The Radiation-Transmission-Reception (RTR) model of propagation: Implications for the effectiveness of network interventions.传播的辐射-传输-接收(RTR)模型:对网络干预措施有效性的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 5;13(12):e0207865. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207865. eCollection 2018.
Nature. 2016 Feb 18;530(7590):307-12. doi: 10.1038/nature16948.
4
Mapping Systemic Risk: Critical Degree and Failures Distribution in Financial Networks.映射系统性风险:金融网络中的关键程度与失败分布
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 24;10(7):e0130948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130948. eCollection 2015.
5
DebtRank: A Microscopic Foundation for Shock Propagation.债务排名:冲击传播的微观基础。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 19;10(6):e0130406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130406. eCollection 2015.
6
Universality in network dynamics.网络动力学中的普遍性。
Nat Phys. 2013;9:673-81. doi: 10.1038/nphys2741.
7
Realistic control of network dynamics.网络动力学的现实控制。
Nat Commun. 2013;4:1942. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2939.
8
DebtRank: too central to fail? Financial networks, the FED and systemic risk.债务评级:大而不倒?金融网络、美联储与系统性风险。
Sci Rep. 2012;2:541. doi: 10.1038/srep00541. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
9
Effect of coagulation of nodes in an evolving complex network.节点在演化复杂网络中的凝聚作用。
Phys Rev Lett. 2012 Apr 20;108(16):168701. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.168701. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
10
Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks.相互依存网络中的灾难性故障级联。
Nature. 2010 Apr 15;464(7291):1025-8. doi: 10.1038/nature08932.