• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

债务排名:冲击传播的微观基础。

DebtRank: A Microscopic Foundation for Shock Propagation.

作者信息

Bardoscia Marco, Battiston Stefano, Caccioli Fabio, Caldarelli Guido

机构信息

London Institute for Mathematical Sciences, London, United Kingdom.

Department of Banking and Finance, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Jun 19;10(6):e0130406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130406. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0130406
PMID:26091013
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4475076/
Abstract

The DebtRank algorithm has been increasingly investigated as a method to estimate the impact of shocks in financial networks, as it overcomes the limitations of the traditional default-cascade approaches. Here we formulate a dynamical "microscopic" theory of instability for financial networks by iterating balance sheet identities of individual banks and by assuming a simple rule for the transfer of shocks from borrowers to lenders. By doing so, we generalise the DebtRank formulation, both providing an interpretation of the effective dynamics in terms of basic accounting principles and preventing the underestimation of losses on certain network topologies. Depending on the structure of the interbank leverage matrix the dynamics is either stable, in which case the asymptotic state can be computed analytically, or unstable, meaning that at least one bank will default. We apply this framework to a dataset of the top listed European banks in the period 2008-2013. We find that network effects can generate an amplification of exogenous shocks of a factor ranging between three (in normal periods) and six (during the crisis) when we stress the system with a 0.5% shock on external (i.e. non-interbank) assets for all banks.

摘要

债务排名算法作为一种评估金融网络中冲击影响的方法,受到了越来越多的研究,因为它克服了传统违约级联方法的局限性。在此,我们通过迭代单个银行的资产负债表恒等式,并假设一个从借款人到贷款人的冲击转移简单规则,为金融网络构建了一个动态的“微观”不稳定性理论。通过这样做,我们推广了债务排名公式,既从基本会计原则的角度对有效动态进行了解释,又防止了在某些网络拓扑结构上对损失的低估。根据银行间杠杆矩阵的结构,动态过程要么是稳定的,在这种情况下渐近状态可以通过解析计算得出,要么是不稳定的,这意味着至少有一家银行会违约。我们将这个框架应用于2008 - 2013年期间欧洲上市顶级银行的数据集。我们发现,当我们对所有银行的外部(即非银行间)资产施加0.5%的冲击来给系统施压时,网络效应会使外部冲击放大三到六倍(正常时期为三倍,危机期间为六倍)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ec2/4475076/edbbf97eebce/pone.0130406.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ec2/4475076/211457a4312c/pone.0130406.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ec2/4475076/edbbf97eebce/pone.0130406.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ec2/4475076/211457a4312c/pone.0130406.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ec2/4475076/edbbf97eebce/pone.0130406.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
DebtRank: A Microscopic Foundation for Shock Propagation.债务排名:冲击传播的微观基础。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 19;10(6):e0130406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130406. eCollection 2015.
2
Distress Propagation in Complex Networks: The Case of Non-Linear DebtRank.复杂网络中的困境传播:非线性债务排名案例
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 4;11(10):e0163825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163825. eCollection 2016.
3
Discovering SIFIs in Interbank Communities.在银行间群体中发现具有系统重要性的金融机构。
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 21;11(12):e0167781. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167781. eCollection 2016.
4
Reverse stress testing interbank networks.银行间网络的反向压力测试。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 15;7(1):15616. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14470-1.
5
Systemic cascades on inhomogeneous random financial networks.非均匀随机金融网络上的系统性级联效应
Math Financ Econ. 2023;17(1):1-21. doi: 10.1007/s11579-022-00315-7. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
6
Intervention on default contagion under partial information in a financial network.部分信息下金融网络中违约传染的干预
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 15;14(1):e0209819. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209819. eCollection 2019.
7
Entangling Credit and Funding Shocks in Interbank Markets.银行间市场中信贷与融资冲击的相互纠缠
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 25;11(8):e0161642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161642. eCollection 2016.
8
DebtRank-transparency: controlling systemic risk in financial networks.债务排名透明度:控制金融网络中的系统性风险。
Sci Rep. 2013;3:1888. doi: 10.1038/srep01888.
9
The Accounting Network: How Financial Institutions React to Systemic Crisis.会计网络:金融机构对系统性危机的反应。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 13;11(10):e0162855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162855. eCollection 2016.
10
Default cascades in complex networks: topology and systemic risk.复杂网络中的默认级联:拓扑结构和系统风险。
Sci Rep. 2013 Sep 26;3:2759. doi: 10.1038/srep02759.

引用本文的文献

1
Inequality in economic shock exposures across the global firm-level supply network.全球企业层面供应链网络中经济冲击暴露的不平等。
Nat Commun. 2024 Apr 18;15(1):3348. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46126-w.
2
Research on systemic risk of China's bank-asset bipartite network.中国银行资产二分网络的系统性风险研究
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 23;10(5):e26952. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26952. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.
3
Systemic risk prevention policies targeting systemically important banks: Does clustering pattern matter?针对系统重要性银行的系统性风险防范政策:聚类模式是否重要?

本文引用的文献

1
A framework for analyzing contagion in assortative banking networks.一个用于分析分类银行网络中传染情况的框架。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 23;12(2):e0170579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170579. eCollection 2017.
2
Estimating topological properties of weighted networks from limited information.从有限信息估计加权网络的拓扑性质。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2015 Oct;92(4):040802. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.92.040802. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
3
Systemic Risk Analysis on Reconstructed Economic and Financial Networks.重构经济与金融网络的系统性风险分析
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 27;18(4):e0284861. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284861. eCollection 2023.
4
Identifying influential financial stocks using simulation with a two-layer network.使用双层网络模拟识别有影响力的金融股。
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 3;9(4):e15161. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15161. eCollection 2023 Apr.
5
Assessing the cascading impacts of natural disasters in a multi-layer behavioral network framework.评估多层行为网络框架中自然灾害的级联影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 11;11(1):20146. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99343-4.
6
Information Network Modeling for U.S. Banking Systemic Risk.美国银行系统性风险的信息网络建模
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Nov 23;22(11):1331. doi: 10.3390/e22111331.
7
A multiplex financial network approach to policy evaluation: the case of euro area Quantitative Easing.一种用于政策评估的多重金融网络方法:以欧元区量化宽松为例。
Appl Netw Sci. 2018;3(1):49. doi: 10.1007/s41109-018-0098-8. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
8
Network-based risk measurements for interbank systems.基于网络的银行间系统风险度量。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 12;13(7):e0200209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200209. eCollection 2018.
9
A dynamic approach merging network theory and credit risk techniques to assess systemic risk in financial networks.一种融合网络理论和信用风险技术的动态方法,用于评估金融网络中的系统性风险。
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 3;8(1):5561. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23689-5.
10
Reverse stress testing interbank networks.银行间网络的反向压力测试。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 15;7(1):15616. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14470-1.
Sci Rep. 2015 Oct 28;5:15758. doi: 10.1038/srep15758.
4
Inside money, procyclical leverage, and banking catastrophes.内生货币、顺周期杠杆与银行业危机
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 19;9(8):e104219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104219. eCollection 2014.
5
Default cascades in complex networks: topology and systemic risk.复杂网络中的默认级联:拓扑结构和系统风险。
Sci Rep. 2013 Sep 26;3:2759. doi: 10.1038/srep02759.
6
DebtRank-transparency: controlling systemic risk in financial networks.债务排名透明度:控制金融网络中的系统性风险。
Sci Rep. 2013;3:1888. doi: 10.1038/srep01888.
7
DebtRank: too central to fail? Financial networks, the FED and systemic risk.债务评级:大而不倒?金融网络、美联储与系统性风险。
Sci Rep. 2012;2:541. doi: 10.1038/srep00541. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
8
Systemic risk in banking ecosystems.银行业生态系统的系统性风险。
Nature. 2011 Jan 20;469(7330):351-5. doi: 10.1038/nature09659.
9
Fitness model for the Italian interbank money market.意大利银行间货币市场的拟合模型
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2006 Dec;74(6 Pt 2):066112. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.066112. Epub 2006 Dec 21.