Michiels-Corsten Matthias, Donner-Banzhoff Norbert
Department of General Practice, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Fam Pract. 2018 Mar 27;35(2):222-227. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmx089.
Diagnostic decision-making is usually disease-focussed and intended to examine the patient's medical condition accurately. But diagnostic interventions may serve further purposes that are not yet fully understood.
To explore GPs' diagnostic behaviour not related to confirming or refuting a specific disease.
We recorded 295 primary care consultations in 12 practices. One hundred thirty-four consultations comprised at least one diagnostic episode. GPs were asked to reflect on their own diagnostic thinking in interviews for every single case. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were applied with focus on the GPs' cognitive processes during diagnostic decision-making.
Primary care physicians clearly stated that they requested some tests for other reasons than diagnosing disease. A feeling of uncertainty stimulated diagnostic procedures aiming to regulate the anticipation of regret. We identified patients' reassurance, patients' requests and strategic issues as further motives for diagnostic actions.
Besides focussing on disease in the diagnostic process, emotional and strategic goals are hidden motives that play a critical role in clinical decision-making. They might even represent an initial factor in a cascade of interventions leading to overdiagnosis. How GPs might control these influences provides an important aspect for further research, practice and teaching.
诊断决策通常以疾病为重点,旨在准确检查患者的病情。但诊断性干预可能还有一些尚未被充分理解的其他目的。
探讨全科医生与确认或排除特定疾病无关的诊断行为。
我们记录了12家诊所的295次初级保健会诊。其中134次会诊包含至少一次诊断过程。要求全科医生在每次病例的访谈中反思自己的诊断思路。采用定性和定量分析方法,重点关注全科医生在诊断决策过程中的认知过程。
基层医疗医生明确表示,他们进行某些检查的原因并非诊断疾病。不确定感促使他们采取诊断程序,以调节对遗憾的预期。我们确定患者的安心、患者的请求和策略性问题是诊断行为的其他动机。
除了在诊断过程中关注疾病外,情感和策略性目标是隐藏的动机,在临床决策中起着关键作用。它们甚至可能是导致过度诊断的一系列干预措施的初始因素。全科医生如何控制这些影响为进一步的研究、实践和教学提供了一个重要方面。