Faculty of Law, Law Health Justice Research Centre, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Health Expect. 2022 Feb;25(1):374-383. doi: 10.1111/hex.13395. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
The patient-clinician interaction is a site at which defensive practice could occur, when clinicians provide tests, procedures and treatments mainly to reduce perceived legal risks, rather than to advance patient care. Defensive practice is a driver of low-value care and exposes patients to the risks of unnecessary interventions. To date, patient perspectives on defensive practice and its impacts on them are largely missing from the literature. This exploratory study conducted in Australia aimed to examine the views and experiences of healthcare consumer representatives in this under-examined area.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with healthcare consumer representatives involved in healthcare consumer advocacy organisations in Australia. Data were transcribed and analysed thematically.
Nine healthcare consumer representatives participated. Most had over 20 years of involvement and advocacy in healthcare, including personal experiences as a patient or carer and/or formal service roles on committees or complaint bodies for healthcare organisations. Participants uniformly viewed defensive practice as having a negative impact on the clinician-patient relationship. Themes identified the importance of fostering patient-clinician partnership, effective communication and informed decision-making. The themes support a shift from the concept of defensive practice to preventive practice in partnership, which focuses on the shared interests of patients and clinicians in achieving safe and high-value care.
This Australian study offers healthcare consumers' perspectives on the impacts of defensive practice on patients. The findings highlight the features of clinician-patient partnership that will help to improve communication and decision-making, and prevent the defensive provision of low-value care.
Healthcare consumer representatives were involved as participants in this study.
医患互动是可能出现防御性医疗实践的场所,当临床医生主要提供检查、程序和治疗以降低感知到的法律风险,而不是为了促进患者护理时,就会出现防御性医疗实践。防御性医疗实践是低价值医疗的驱动因素,使患者面临不必要干预的风险。迄今为止,文献中基本上没有患者对防御性医疗实践及其对他们的影响的看法。这项在澳大利亚进行的探索性研究旨在检查医疗保健消费者代表在这一研究不足的领域的观点和经验。
对参与澳大利亚医疗保健消费者倡导组织的医疗保健消费者代表进行半结构式访谈。对数据进行转录并进行主题分析。
9 名医疗保健消费者代表参加了研究。他们大多数人参与医疗保健工作超过 20 年,包括作为患者或照顾者的个人经历,以及在医疗保健组织的委员会或投诉机构中担任正式服务角色。参与者一致认为防御性医疗实践对医患关系有负面影响。确定的主题包括培养医患伙伴关系、有效沟通和知情决策的重要性。这些主题支持从防御性医疗实践向伙伴关系中的预防性医疗实践转变,重点是患者和临床医生在实现安全和高价值护理方面的共同利益。
这项澳大利亚研究提供了医疗保健消费者对防御性医疗实践对患者影响的看法。研究结果强调了有助于改善沟通和决策并防止提供低价值医疗的医患伙伴关系的特征。
医疗保健消费者代表作为参与者参与了这项研究。