Suppr超能文献

颈椎全椎间盘置换与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术:美国 72688 例患者的再次手术率、并发症及医院资源利用情况。

Cervical Total Disc Replacement and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Reoperation Rates, Complications, and Hospital Resource Utilization in 72 688 Patients in the United States.

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of Missouri - Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri.

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2018 Apr 1;82(4):441-453. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx289.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Healthcare readmissions are important causes of increased cost and have profound clinical impact. Thirty-day readmissions in spine surgery have been well documented. However, rates, causes, and outcomes are not well understood outside 30 d.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze 30- and 90-d readmissions for a retrospective cohort of anterior cervical discectomy and fusions (ACDF) and total disc replacement (TDR) for degenerative cervical conditions.

METHODS

The Nationwide Readmissions Database approximates 50% of all US hospitalizations with patient identifiers to track patients longitudinally. Patients greater than 18 yr old were identified. Rates of readmission for 30 and 90 d were calculated. Predictor variables, complications, outcomes, and costs were analyzed via univariate and multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

Between January and September 2013, 72 688 patients were identified. The 30- and 90-d readmission rates were 2.67% and 5.97%, respectively. The most prevalent reason for 30-d readmission was complication of medical/surgical care (20.3%), whereas for 90-d readmission it was degenerative spine etiology (19.2%). Common risk factors for 30- and 90-d readmission included older age, male gender, Medicare/Medicaid, prolonged initial length of stay, and various comorbidities. Unique risk factors for 30- and 90-d readmissions included adverse discharge disposition and mechanical implant-related complications, respectively. When comparing ACDF and TDR, ACDFs were associated with increased 90-d readmissions (6.0% vs 4.3%). The TDR cohort had a shorter length of stay, lower complication rate, and fewer adverse discharge dispositions.

CONCLUSION

Identification of readmission causes and predictors is important to potentially allow for changes in periperative management. Decreasing readmissions would improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs.

摘要

背景

医疗保健再入院是增加成本的重要原因,并且具有深远的临床影响。脊柱手术的 30 天再入院率已有详细记录。然而,30 天以外的再入院率、原因和结果尚不清楚。

目的

分析退行性颈椎疾病行前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)和全椎间盘置换术(TDR)的回顾性队列患者的 30 天和 90 天再入院率。

方法

全国再入院数据库大约涵盖了 50%的美国住院患者,并使用患者标识符对患者进行纵向跟踪。确定年龄大于 18 岁的患者。计算 30 天和 90 天的再入院率。通过单变量和多变量分析分析预测变量、并发症、结局和成本。

结果

2013 年 1 月至 9 月,共确定了 72688 例患者。30 天和 90 天的再入院率分别为 2.67%和 5.97%。30 天再入院的最常见原因是医疗/手术并发症(20.3%),而 90 天再入院的最常见原因是退行性脊柱病因(19.2%)。30 天和 90 天再入院的常见危险因素包括年龄较大、男性、医疗保险/医疗补助、初始住院时间延长和各种合并症。30 天和 90 天再入院的独特危险因素分别是不良出院处理和机械植入物相关并发症。与 ACDF 相比,ACDF 与 90 天再入院率增加相关(6.0%比 4.3%)。TDR 队列的住院时间更短、并发症发生率更低、不良出院处理更少。

结论

确定再入院的原因和预测因素对于潜在改变围手术期管理很重要。减少再入院率将改善患者结局并降低医疗保健成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验