• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

门诊与住院颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术:基于人群的结局和成本分析。

Outpatient vs Inpatient Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Population-Level Analysis of Outcomes and Cost.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California.

Depart-ment of Medicine, Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University, Stanford, California.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2018 Apr 1;82(4):454-464. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx215.

DOI:10.1093/neuros/nyx215
PMID:28498922
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a promising candidate for US healthcare cost reduction as several studies have demonstrated that overall complications are relatively low and early discharge can preserve high patient satisfaction, low morbidity, and minimal readmission.

OBJECTIVE

To compare clinical outcomes and associated costs between inpatient and ambulatory setting ACDF.

METHODS

Demographics, comorbidities, emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, reoperation rates, and 90-d charges were retrospectively analyzed for patients undergoing elective ACDF in California, Florida, and New York from 2009 to 2011 in State Inpatient and Ambulatory Databases.

RESULTS

A total of 3135 ambulatory and 46 996 inpatient ACDFs were performed. Mean Charlson comorbidity index, length of stay, and mortality were 0.2, 0.4 d, and 0% in the ambulatory cohort and 0.4, 1.8 d, and 0.04% for inpatients (P < .0001). Ambulatory patients were younger (48.0 vs 53.1) and more likely to be Caucasian. One hundred sixty-eight ambulatory patients (5.4%) presented to the ED within 30 d (mean 11.3 d), 51 (1.6%) were readmitted, and 5 (0.2%) underwent reoperation. Among inpatient surgeries, 2607 patients (5.5%) presented to the ED within 30 d (mean 9.7 d), 1778 (3.8%) were readmitted (mean 6.3 d), and 200 (0.4%) underwent reoperation. Higher Charlson comorbidity index increased rate of ED visits (ambulatory operating room [OR] 1.285, P < .05; inpatient OR 1.289, P < .0001) and readmission (ambulatory OR 1.746, P < .0001; inpatient OR 1.685, P < .0001). Overall charges were significantly lower for ambulatory ACDFs ($33 362.51 vs $74 667.04; P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

ACDF can be performed in an ambulatory setting with comparable morbidity and readmission rates, and lower costs, to those performed in an inpatient setting.

摘要

背景

门诊颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术(ACDF)是降低美国医疗成本的有前途的选择,因为多项研究表明,总体并发症相对较低,早期出院可以保持高患者满意度、低发病率和最低再入院率。

目的

比较住院和门诊 ACDF 的临床结果和相关成本。

方法

回顾性分析了 2009 年至 2011 年加利福尼亚州、佛罗里达州和纽约州州立住院和门诊数据库中接受择期 ACDF 的患者的人口统计学、合并症、急诊就诊、再入院、再次手术率和 90 天费用。

结果

共进行了 3135 例门诊和 46996 例住院 ACDF。门诊组的平均 Charlson 合并症指数、住院时间和死亡率分别为 0.2、0.4 天和 0%,而住院组分别为 0.4、1.8 天和 0.04%(P<.0001)。门诊患者更年轻(48.0 岁 vs 53.1 岁),更有可能是白人。168 名门诊患者(5.4%)在 30 天内(平均 11.3 天)到急诊就诊,51 名(1.6%)再入院,5 名(0.2%)再次手术。在住院手术中,2607 名患者(5.5%)在 30 天内(平均 9.7 天)到急诊就诊,1778 名(3.8%)再入院(平均 6.3 天),200 名(0.4%)再次手术。Charlson 合并症指数较高会增加急诊就诊率(门诊手术室[OR]1.285,P<.05;住院 OR 1.289,P<.0001)和再入院率(门诊 OR 1.746,P<.0001;住院 OR 1.685,P<.0001)。门诊 ACDF 的总费用明显低于住院 ACDF(33362.51 美元 vs 74667.04 美元;P<.0001)。

结论

ACDF 可以在门诊环境中进行,其发病率和再入院率与住院环境相当,且成本更低。

相似文献

1
Outpatient vs Inpatient Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Population-Level Analysis of Outcomes and Cost.门诊与住院颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术:基于人群的结局和成本分析。
Neurosurgery. 2018 Apr 1;82(4):454-464. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx215.
2
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the outpatient ambulatory surgery setting compared with the inpatient hospital setting: analysis of 1000 consecutive cases.门诊日间手术环境下与住院环境下的颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术:1000例连续病例分析
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jun;24(6):878-84. doi: 10.3171/2015.8.SPINE14284. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
3
Retrospective single-surgeon study of 1123 consecutive cases of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a comparison of clinical outcome parameters, complication rates, and costs between outpatient and inpatient surgery groups, with a literature review.对1123例连续的颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术病例进行的单外科医生回顾性研究:门诊手术组与住院手术组临床结果参数、并发症发生率及费用的比较,并附文献综述
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Jun;28(6):630-641. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.SPINE17938. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
4
Ambulatory anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is associated with a higher risk of revision surgery and perioperative complications: an analysis of a large nationwide database.门诊前路颈椎间盘切除术和融合术与更高的翻修手术和围手术期并发症风险相关:一项基于大型全国性数据库的分析。
Spine J. 2018 Jul;18(7):1180-1187. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.11.012. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
5
Analysis of Outcomes and Cost of Inpatient and Ambulatory Anterior Cervical Disk Replacement Using a State-level Database.使用国家级数据库对住院和门诊颈椎前路椎间盘置换的结果及成本进行分析。
Clin Spine Surg. 2019 Oct;32(8):E372-E379. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000840.
6
Outpatient and Inpatient Readmission Rates of 1- and 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgeries.1 级和 2 级颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的门诊和住院再入院率。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;126:e1475-e1481. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.124. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
7
Trends and Costs of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: a Comparison of Inpatient And Outpatient Procedures.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的趋势与成本:住院手术与门诊手术的比较
Iowa Orthop J. 2018;38:167-176.
8
Quality analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the outpatient versus inpatient setting: analysis of 7288 patients from the NSQIP database.门诊与住院环境下颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的质量分析:来自NSQIP数据库的7288例患者分析
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Dec;39(6):E9. doi: 10.3171/2015.9.FOCUS15335.
9
Cervical Total Disc Replacement and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Reoperation Rates, Complications, and Hospital Resource Utilization in 72 688 Patients in the United States.颈椎全椎间盘置换与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术:美国 72688 例患者的再次手术率、并发症及医院资源利用情况。
Neurosurgery. 2018 Apr 1;82(4):441-453. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx289.
10
Cost Analysis of Outpatient Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion at an Academic Medical Center without Dedicated Ambulatory Surgery Centers.学术医学中心无专用日间手术中心的门诊颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术的成本分析。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Feb;146:e940-e946. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.11.049. Epub 2020 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety of Outpatient Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses.门诊前路腰椎椎间融合手术的安全性:一项荟萃分析的系统评价
Int J Spine Surg. 2024 Nov 19;18(6):705-11. doi: 10.14444/8661.
2
Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Hospital Outpatient Versus Ambulatory Surgery Center Lumbar Decompression Surgery.医院门诊与门诊手术中心腰椎减压手术的疗效及成本效益
Global Spine J. 2025 May;15(4):2193-2200. doi: 10.1177/21925682241290171. Epub 2024 Oct 6.
3
Database analysis comparing incidence and complication rates between inpatient and outpatient laminotomies for lumbar disc herniation.
腰椎间盘突出症住院与门诊椎板切除术的发病率和并发症发生率比较的数据库分析
N Am Spine Soc J. 2024 May 7;18:100328. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100328. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Association of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Deprivation With Utilization and Costs of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.社区社会经济剥夺与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的利用和费用的关系。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023 Sep 15;48(18):1272-1281. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004769. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
5
A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 100 Cited Articles in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术领域被引频次最高的100篇文章的文献计量分析
J Pain Res. 2022 Oct 11;15:3137-3156. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S375720. eCollection 2022.
6
A Multi-Disciplinary Review of Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing: Practical Considerations for Spine Surgery.基于时间驱动作业成本法的多学科综述:脊柱手术的实际考量
Global Spine J. 2023 Apr;13(3):823-839. doi: 10.1177/21925682221121303. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
7
Advanced Technologies for Outpatient Lumbar Fusion: Barriers and Opportunities.门诊腰椎融合的先进技术:障碍与机遇
Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Oct;16(S2):S37-S43. doi: 10.14444/8275. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
8
Increase in surgeons performing outpatient anterior cervical spine surgery leads to a shift in case volumes over time.进行门诊颈椎前路手术的外科医生数量增加,导致病例数量随时间发生变化。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2022 Jun 12;11:100132. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2022.100132. eCollection 2022 Sep.
9
Safety and outcomes of performing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy at an ambulatory site of a tertiary care hospital in Ontario.安大略省一家三级护理医院门诊施行腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术的安全性和结果。
Can J Surg. 2022 Jan 18;65(1):E38-E44. doi: 10.1503/cjs.007120. Print 2022 Jan-Feb.
10
Outpatient Versus Inpatient Anterior Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Multisite, Comparative Analysis of Patient Safety Measures.门诊与住院腰椎前路手术:患者安全措施的多中心比较分析
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Oct;15(5):937-944. doi: 10.14444/8123. Epub 2021 Sep 22.