Suppr超能文献

地塞米松对脑膜炎球菌败血症有帮助吗?

Does Dexamethasone Helps in Meningococcal Sepsis?

作者信息

Tolaj Ilir, Ramadani Hamdi, Mehmeti Murat, Gashi Hatixhe, Kasumi Arbana, Gashi Visar, Jashari Haki

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases, University Clinical Centre in Pristina, Kosovo.

出版信息

Med Arch. 2017 Jun;71(3):173-177. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2017.71.173-177.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Prompt recognition and aggressive early treatment are the only effective measures against invasive meningococcal disease (IMD). Anti-inflammatory adjunctive treatment remains controversial and difficult to assess in patients with IMD. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of dexamethasone (DXM) as adjunctive treatment in different clinical forms of IMD, and attempt to answer if DXM should be routinely used in the treatment of IMD.

METHODS

In this non-interventional clinical study (NIS), 39 patients with meningococcal septicaemia with or without of meningitis were included, and compared regarding the impact of dexamethasone (DXM), as an adjunctive treatment, on the outcome of IMD. SPSS statistics is used for statistical processing of data.

RESULTS

Thirty (76.9%) patients with IMD had sepsis and meningitis, and 9 (23.1%) of them had sepsis alone. Dexamethasone was used in 24 (61.5%) cases, in both clinical groups. The overall mortality rate was 10.3%. Pneumonia was diagnosed in 6 patients (15.4%), arthritis in 3 of them (7.7%), and subdural effusion in one patient (2.6%). The data showed a significant statistical difference on the length of hospitalization, and WBC normalization in groups of patients treated with DXM.

CONCLUSION

The use of DXM as adjunctive therapy in invasive meningococcal disease has a degree of proven benefits and no harmful effects. In fighting this very dangerous and complex infection, even a limited benefit is sufficient to recommend the use of DXM as adjunctive treatment in invasive meningococcal disease.

摘要

目的

迅速识别并积极进行早期治疗是对抗侵袭性脑膜炎球菌病(IMD)的唯一有效措施。在IMD患者中,抗炎辅助治疗仍存在争议且难以评估。本研究的目的是评估地塞米松(DXM)作为辅助治疗在不同临床形式的IMD中的效果,并试图回答DXM是否应常规用于IMD的治疗。

方法

在这项非干预性临床研究(NIS)中,纳入了39例患有或未患有脑膜炎的脑膜炎球菌败血症患者,并比较了作为辅助治疗的地塞米松(DXM)对IMD结局的影响。使用SPSS统计软件对数据进行统计处理。

结果

30例(76.9%)IMD患者患有败血症和脑膜炎,其中9例(23.1%)仅患有败血症。两个临床组中均有24例(61.5%)使用了地塞米松。总死亡率为10.3%。6例患者(15.4%)被诊断出患有肺炎,其中3例(7.7%)患有关节炎,1例患者(2.6%)患有硬膜下积液。数据显示,在接受DXM治疗的患者组中,住院时间和白细胞恢复正常方面存在显著统计学差异。

结论

在侵袭性脑膜炎球菌病中使用DXM作为辅助治疗有一定程度的已证实益处且无有害影响。在对抗这种非常危险和复杂的感染时,即使是有限的益处也足以推荐在侵袭性脑膜炎球菌病中使用DXM作为辅助治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f319/5585801/4ad9469468d8/MA-71-173-g004.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验