Oper Dent. 2017 Nov/Dec;42(6):646-657. doi: 10.2341/16-224-L. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
To evaluate the effects of direct composite resin without a post or with one or two fiberglass posts on the restoration of severely compromised endodontically treated molars.
Forty-five molars with 2 mm of "remaining tooth structure" were divided into three groups: Wfgp, restored with Filtek Z350XT without a fiberglass post; 1fgp, restored with Z350XT with one fiberglass post in the distal root canal; and 2fgp, restored with Z350XT with two fiberglass posts, one in the distal root canal and the other in the mesial-buccal root canal. The teeth were load cycled. Tooth remaining strain was measured using strain gauges (n=10) at two moments: TrSt-100 N, during 100 N occlusal loading, and TrSt-Fr, at fracture load. Fracture resistance was calculated, and fracture mode was classified. The elastic modulus and Vickers hardness were calculated using dynamic indentation (n=5). Stress distribution was analyzed by three-dimensional finite element analysis.
The use of two fiberglass posts resulted in lower fracture resistance than was noted in the groups with one fiberglass post and without fiberglass posts. The lingual surface of the remaining tooth had higher strain values than the buccal surface, regardless of the restorative technique and moment of evaluation. The absence of a fiberglass post resulted in significantly higher strain values and more irreparable fracture modes than were noted in the other groups. The use of one fiberglass post had a better strain/fracture resistance ratio. Stresses were concentrated in the occlusal portion of the post and in the furcation region. The presence of one fiberglass post resulted in better stress distribution in the entire distal root dentin, reducing stress on the critical areas.
The use of one fiberglass post for restoring molars with direct composite resin resulted in higher fracture resistance than did the use of two fiberglass posts; it also resulted in better tooth remaining strain and stress distribution and more reparable fracture modes than were seen in the group without a fiberglass post.
评估不使用纤维桩或使用一根或两根玻璃纤维桩直接复合树脂对严重受损根管治疗后磨牙修复的影响。
将 45 颗“剩余牙体组织”为 2 毫米的磨牙分为三组:Wfgp,用 Filtek Z350XT 不使用纤维桩修复;1fgp,用 Z350XT 在远根管中使用一根纤维桩修复;2fgp,用 Z350XT 在远根管和近颊根管中各使用一根纤维桩修复。牙齿进行负载循环。使用应变计在两个时刻测量牙剩余应变:TrSt-100 N,在 100 N 咬合加载时;TrSt-Fr,在断裂载荷时。计算断裂阻力,并对断裂模式进行分类。使用动态压痕计算弹性模量和维氏硬度(n=5)。通过三维有限元分析分析应力分布。
使用两根玻璃纤维桩导致的断裂阻力低于使用一根玻璃纤维桩和不使用玻璃纤维桩的组。无论修复技术和评估时刻如何,剩余牙的舌侧表面应变值均高于颊侧表面。不使用纤维桩导致的应变值明显高于其他组,且更易发生不可修复的断裂模式。使用一根纤维桩具有更好的应变/断裂阻力比。应力集中在桩的咬合部分和分叉区域。使用一根玻璃纤维桩可改善整个远根管牙本质的应力分布,从而减少对关键区域的应力。
使用一根玻璃纤维桩直接复合树脂修复磨牙的断裂阻力高于使用两根玻璃纤维桩;它还导致剩余牙应变和应力分布更好,且更易发生可修复的断裂模式,优于不使用纤维桩的组。