Suppr超能文献

工具评估中的信度和效度的心理测量特性。

Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity.

作者信息

Souza Ana Cláudia de, Alexandre Neusa Maria Costa, Guirardello Edinêis de Brito

机构信息

Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Enfermagem, Campinas-SP, Brasil.

出版信息

Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2017 Jul-Sep;26(3):649-659. doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022.

Abstract

Measurement instruments play an important role in research, clinical practice and health assessment. Studies on the quality of these instruments provide evidence of how the measurement properties were assessed, helping the researcher choose the best tool to use. Reliability and validity are considered the main measurement properties of such instruments. Reliability is the ability to reproduce a result consistently in time and space. Validity refers to the property of an instrument to measure exactly what it proposes. In this article, the main criteria and statistical tests used in the assessment of reliability (stability, internal consistency and equivalence) and validity (content, criterion and construct) of instruments are presented, discussed and exemplified. The assessment of instruments measurement properties is useful to subsidize the selection of valid and reliable tools, in order to ensure the quality of the results of studies.

摘要

测量工具在研究、临床实践和健康评估中发挥着重要作用。对这些工具质量的研究提供了测量特性如何评估的证据,有助于研究人员选择最佳的工具使用。可靠性和有效性被认为是此类工具的主要测量特性。可靠性是指在时间和空间上一致地再现结果的能力。有效性是指一种工具能够准确测量其所要测量内容的特性。本文介绍、讨论并举例说明了评估工具可靠性(稳定性、内部一致性和等效性)和有效性(内容、标准和结构)所使用的主要标准和统计测试。评估工具的测量特性有助于为选择有效和可靠的工具提供依据,以确保研究结果的质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验