Batista Mariana Biagi, Romanzini Catiana Leila Possamai, Castro-Piñero José, Ronque Enio Ricardo Vaz
Grupo de Estudo e Pesquisa em Atividade Física e Exercício Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Londrina, PR, Brasil.
Departamento de Educação Física, Escola de Educação, Universidade de Cádiz, Puerto Real, Espanha.
Rev Paul Pediatr. 2017 Apr-Jun;35(2):222-233. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/;2017;35;2;00002.
To systematically review the literature to verify the validity of field-tests to evaluate cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) in children and adolescents.
The electronic search was conducted in the databases: Medline (PubMed), SPORTDiscus, Scopus, Web of Science, in addition to the Latin American databases LILACS and SciELO. The search comprised the period from the inception of each database until February 2015, in English and Portuguese. All stages of the process were performed in accordance with the PRISMA flow diagram.
After confirming the inclusion criteria, eligibility, and quality of the studies, 43 studies were analyzed in full; 38 obtained through the searches in the electronic databases, and 5 through private libraries, and references from other articles. Of the total studies, only 13 were considered high quality according to the adopted criteria. The most commonly investigated test in the literature was the 20-meter shuttle run (SR-20 m), accounting for 23 studies, followed by tests of distances between 550 meters and 1 mile, in 9 studies, timed tests of 6, 9, and 12 minutes, also 9 studies, and finally bench protocols and new test proposals represented in 7 studies.
The SR-20-m test seems to be the most appropriate to evaluate the CRF of young people with the equation of Barnett, recommended to estimate VO2 peak. As an alternative for evaluating CRF, the 1-mile test is indicated with the equation proposed by Cureton for estimating VO2 peak.
系统回顾文献，以验证用于评估儿童和青少年心肺适能（CRF）的现场测试的有效性。
除拉丁美洲数据库LILACS和SciELO外，还在Medline（PubMed）、SPORTDiscus、Scopus、Web of Science数据库中进行了电子检索。检索涵盖了每个数据库自创建至2015年2月的时间段，检索语言为英语和葡萄牙语。该过程的所有阶段均按照PRISMA流程图进行。
在确认研究的纳入标准、合格性和质量后，对43项研究进行了全面分析；其中38项通过电子数据库检索获得，5项通过私人图书馆以及其他文章的参考文献获得。在所有研究中，根据所采用的标准，只有13项被认为是高质量的。文献中最常研究的测试是20米往返跑（SR - 20 m），有23项研究，其次是550米至1英里距离的测试，有9项研究，6、9和12分钟的定时测试，也有9项研究，最后是7项研究中的台阶测试方案和新的测试建议。
SR - 20 - m测试似乎最适合使用Barnett方程评估年轻人的CRF，该方程推荐用于估计最大摄氧量（VO2峰值）。作为评估CRF的替代方法，1英里测试可采用Cureton提出的方程来估计VO2峰值。
