Schneider J, Edenharder R, Borneff J
Hygiene-Institut, Universität Mainz.
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B Umwelthyg Krankenhaushyg Arbeitshyg Prav Med. 1988 Jan;185(4-5):368-78.
The drinking-water regulations of the Federal Republic of Germany, from 22.05.1986, contains in paragraph 1 the instructions: "Drinking-water must be free of pathogens", and further in paragraph 11, "Responsibilities of the employer or other owner of a water supplying facility", include that: "The official authority may direct, that the employer...of a water supplying facility has to extend or has to cause to extend the microbiological examinations in order to determine, that...sulfite-reducing, spore-forming anaerobes (Clostridia) can not be detected in 20 ml of water..." The drinking-water regulations do not prescribe a bacteriological examination method in detail. Appendix 1 rules only that the examination for sulfite-reducing, spore-forming anaerobes (Clostridia) has to be performed after heating the sample to 75 degrees C (+/- 5 degrees C) for 10 min, by either the multiple-tube or membrane filtration method and cultivation in DRCM1-medium. If growth occurs, the presence of Clostridia must be confirmed by anaerobic and aerobic subcultivation. Furthermore, a DIN-instruction (DIN 38411, part 7) exists, which prescribes a detailed procedure for multiple-tube and membrane filtration methods, but does not provide for strict anaerobiosis. We were, however, unable to detect Clostridia in a multitude of water samples with the methods of the DIN-regulation. In order to examine if neglect of strict anaerobiosis was the reason for these failures, we checked the suitability of the DIN-regulation for the isolation of Clostridia from drinking water. In preliminary tests we examined up to four strains of the species C. botulinum, C. cadaveris, C. cochlearium, C. difficile, C. innocuum, C. perfringens and C. tertium for their ability to form heat-resistent spores in four sporulation media. It was, however, not possible to find a medium, in which all strains could sporulate within one week. In order to characterize the detection of these anaerobes in water, one particularly well-sporulating strain of each of the following, C. cadaveris, C. difficile and C. perfringens, was selected and the multiple-tube and membrane-filtration methods were compared. Counts of C. difficile and C. perfringens detected by the multiple-tube method were identical with counts of test-suspensions determinded by the most probable number (MPN) method. It was found to be decisive that only freshly prepared DRCM-medium be used and that, disagreeing with the DIN-instruction, cultivation at 37 degrees C is continued for at least four days.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
1986年5月22日起实施的德意志联邦共和国饮用水法规第1条规定:“饮用水必须无病原体”,第11条“供水设施所有者或其他业主的责任”进一步规定:“官方当局可以指示供水设施的业主……扩大或促使扩大微生物检验,以确定在20毫升水中检测不出……亚硫酸盐还原、产芽孢厌氧菌(梭菌属)……”。饮用水法规未详细规定细菌学检验方法。附录1仅规定,对于亚硫酸盐还原、产芽孢厌氧菌(梭菌属)的检验,必须在将样品加热至75摄氏度(正负5摄氏度)10分钟后,采用多管法或膜过滤法,并在DRCM1培养基中培养。如果有生长现象,必须通过厌氧和好氧传代培养来确认梭菌属的存在。此外,存在一项德国工业标准指令(DIN 38411第7部分),该指令规定了多管法和膜过滤法的详细程序,但未规定严格的厌氧条件。然而,我们用DIN标准的方法在大量水样中未能检测到梭菌属。为了检验忽视严格厌氧条件是否是这些检测失败的原因,我们检查了DIN标准对于从饮用水中分离梭菌属的适用性。在初步试验中,我们在四种芽孢形成培养基中检测了多达四株肉毒梭菌、尸毒梭菌、耳蜗梭菌、艰难梭菌、无害梭菌、产气荚膜梭菌和第三梭菌形成耐热芽孢的能力。然而,找不到一种培养基能使所有菌株在一周内形成芽孢。为了描述水中这些厌氧菌的检测情况,我们从尸毒梭菌、艰难梭菌和产气荚膜梭菌中各选了一株芽孢形成特别好的菌株,并比较了多管法和膜过滤法。多管法检测到的艰难梭菌和产气荚膜梭菌数量与用最大可能数(MPN)法测定的试验悬浮液数量相同。决定性的一点是,必须使用新鲜制备的DRCM培养基,并且与DIN指令不同的是,在37摄氏度下培养至少四天。(摘要截取自400字)