Suppr超能文献

抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体(ANCA)预测ANCA相关性血管炎复发的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析

Diagnostic accuracy of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) in predicting relapses of ANCA-associated vasculitis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Mehta Pankti, Balakrishnan Anu, Phatak Sanat, Pathak Mona, Ahmed Sakir

机构信息

King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.

Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.

出版信息

Rheumatol Int. 2023 Mar;43(3):437-448. doi: 10.1007/s00296-022-05192-3. Epub 2022 Aug 30.

Abstract

Relapse in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Utility of ANCA for prediction of relapses is still controversial. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and WebOfScience were searched, screened and confirmed for inclusion [PROSPERO No: CRD42020220308]. Studies measuring serial ANCA by ELISA or indirect immunofluorescence (IF), reporting relapses with sufficient data to calculate sensitivity and specificity were included. Diagnostic odds ratio (OR), sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios (LR) were synthesized using a bivariate mixed-effect regression model. Sub-group analysis included a comparison between ELISA and IIF, anti-myeloperoxidase (MPO) and -proteinase 3(PR3), and type of rise in ANCA. For meta-analysis of survival outcomes, hazard ratios were synthesized using a random-effect model. QUADAS-2 was used for assessing quality of studies, I statistic for heterogeneity Begg's test for publication bias. 2946 abstracts and 43 full-texts were reviewed to identify 26 eligible studies that included 2623 patients with AAV and 848 relapses. Overall heterogeneity was high [I = 99%] and the overall risk of bias was low to moderate. ANCA positivity by either ELISA or immunofluorescence for predicting relapse of AAV had a sensitivity of 0.70(95% CI 0.58-0.81), specificity of 0.66(0.55-0.76), positive LR of 2.1(1.6-42.7) and negative LR of 0.44(0.30-0.60). ELISA performed marginally better [OR: 5(3-7)] than IIF [OR: 4(2-9)] with similar sensitivity, specificity, PLR and NLR. The area under the curve for PR3 was 0.74(0.7-0.77), while that for MPO was not computed as the number of eligible studies was only three. In the survival analysis, the hazard ratio for relapse was 3.11(1.7-5.65). The meta-analysis shows modest accuracy of ANCA in predicting relapses of ANCA vasculitis and supports the use of serial ANCA monitoring as a biomarker for relapse.

摘要

抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体(ANCA)相关血管炎(AAV)的复发与显著的发病率和死亡率相关。ANCA在预测复发方面的效用仍存在争议。我们检索、筛选并确认了PubMed/MEDLINE、Scopus和WebOfScience数据库中的文献以纳入研究[国际前瞻性系统评价注册库编号:CRD42020220308]。纳入通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)或间接免疫荧光法(IF)检测系列ANCA,并报告复发情况且有足够数据计算敏感性和特异性的研究。使用双变量混合效应回归模型综合诊断比值比(OR)、敏感性、特异性和似然比(LR)。亚组分析包括ELISA与IIF、抗髓过氧化物酶(MPO)与抗蛋白酶3(PR3)以及ANCA升高类型之间的比较。对于生存结局的荟萃分析,使用随机效应模型综合风险比。使用QUADAS - 2评估研究质量,用I统计量评估异质性,用Begg检验评估发表偏倚。共审查了2946篇摘要和43篇全文,以确定26项符合条件的研究,这些研究包括2623例AAV患者和848次复发。总体异质性较高[I = 99%],总体偏倚风险为低到中度。通过ELISA或免疫荧光法检测ANCA阳性以预测AAV复发的敏感性为0.70(95%可信区间0.58 - 0.81),特异性为0.66(0.55 - 0.76),阳性似然比为2.1(1.6 - 42.7),阴性似然比为0.44(0.30 - 0.60)。ELISA的表现略优于IIF[OR:5(3 - 7)]与IIF[OR:4(2 - 9)],敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比和阴性似然比相似。PR3的曲线下面积为0.74(0.7 - 0.77),而MPO的曲线下面积未计算,因为符合条件的研究仅有三项。在生存分析中,复发的风险比为3.11(1.7 - 5.65)。荟萃分析表明ANCA在预测ANCA血管炎复发方面准确性一般,并支持将系列ANCA监测作为复发的生物标志物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验