Wang Wei, Zheng Lei, Zhou Ning, Li Na, Bulibu Gilisihan, Xu Chunlei, Zhang Yi, Tang Yong
Department of Digestive Internal Medicine, The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xin Jiang Province, China.
Department of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Oncotarget. 2017 Aug 7;8(37):62500-62507. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20055. eCollection 2017 Sep 22.
Telomere length (TL) has been reported to be associated with the risk and survival of several cancers. But it is unclear for the prognostic role of TL in colorectal cancer (CRC).
Relevant citations were searched and identified using several major online databases through April 2017 which investigated associations between TL and CRC prognosis. We combined summary estimates using hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI), which were pooled using a random-effects model. Overall survival (OS) was set as the primary outcome of interest.
There are 8 cohort studies encompassing 1622 patients included in the meta-analysis. Pooled estimate indicated that long TL was not significantly associated with patient OS (HR 1.26, 95% CI, 0.76 to 2.08). When we conducted subgroup analyses based on baseline charcteristics, we found that long TL (versus short TL) was significantly associated with poor OS in studies conducted in Europe ( 4, HR 2.73, 95% CI, 1.65 to 4.52, I = 0), using Southern blot to measure TL ( 3, HR 2.93, 95% CI, 1.69 to 5.10, I = 0) and patients' age more than 60 years ( 3, HR 2.65, 95% CI, 1.22 to 5.76, I = 0). We found no significant associations between TL and patient disease-free, recurrence-free or progression-free survival (HR 1.19, 95% CI, 0.45 to 3.15).
Current evidence did not provide solid indication that long TL is significantly associated with improved or poor survival for patients with CRC. Further large sample size prospective cohort studies are warranted to determine the true relationship for specific patients.
据报道,端粒长度(TL)与几种癌症的风险和生存率相关。但TL在结直肠癌(CRC)中的预后作用尚不清楚。
通过检索几个主要在线数据库,确定截至2017年4月研究TL与CRC预后之间关联的相关文献。我们使用风险比(HR)合并汇总估计值,并给出95%置信区间(CI),采用随机效应模型进行汇总。总生存期(OS)被设定为主要关注结局。
荟萃分析纳入了8项队列研究,共1622例患者。汇总估计表明,长TL与患者OS无显著相关性(HR 1.26,95%CI为0.76至2.08)。当我们根据基线特征进行亚组分析时,发现长TL(与短TL相比)在欧洲开展的研究中与较差的OS显著相关(4项研究,HR 2.73,95%CI为1.65至4.52,I²=0),使用Southern印迹法测量TL的研究中(3项研究,HR 2.93,95%CI为1.69至5.10,I²=0)以及患者年龄大于60岁的研究中(3项研究,HR 2.65,95%CI为1.22至5.76,I²=0)。我们发现TL与患者无病生存期、无复发生存期或无进展生存期之间无显著相关性(HR 1.19,95%CI为0.45至3.15)。
目前的证据并未确凿表明长TL与CRC患者生存率的改善或降低显著相关。有必要开展进一步的大样本量前瞻性队列研究,以确定特定患者的真实关系。