用于真空抽吸的金属套管和塑料套管的比较。
A comparison of metal and plastic cannulae for vacuum aspiration.
作者信息
Narvekar M R, Pachauri S, Mhatre V, Mandlekar A, Ananthakrishna R
出版信息
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1978;15(5):433-5. doi: 10.1002/j.1879-3479.1977.tb00726.x.
A comparative study of the safety and effectiveness of metal (Purandare) versus plastic (Karman) cannulae for first trimester abortion was conducted on 400 women. Two hundred vacuum aspiration procedures were performed using each type of cannula. All aspirations were performed by a single physician, and patient follow-up was performed by a second physician. The complication rates, amount of retained tissue, rates of cannula obstruction and procedure times of the two cannulae were compared. Our findings showed no significant difference in any of these evaluation criteria for the metal and plastic cannulae.
对400名妇女进行了一项关于金属（普兰达雷）与塑料（卡曼）套管用于孕早期流产的安全性和有效性的比较研究。每种类型的套管均进行了200次真空抽吸手术。所有抽吸手术均由一名医生进行，患者随访由另一名医生进行。比较了两种套管的并发症发生率、残留组织量、套管阻塞率和手术时间。我们的研究结果表明，在这些评估标准中，金属套管和塑料套管之间没有显著差异。
Zotero 插件