• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测分离主义冲突中的和解支持。

Predicting Support for Reconciliation in Separatist Conflict.

机构信息

1 VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

2 Leiden University, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Feb;44(2):173-185. doi: 10.1177/0146167217733076. Epub 2017 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1177/0146167217733076
PMID:28978298
Abstract

The current research examined two fundamental motives that could lie at the root of separatist groups' desire to be independent from the nonseparatist majority: the need to maintain the own subgroup identity and the need to preserve power vis-à-vis the majority. These motives were examined in two studies through surveys among samples of indigenous people in West Papua ( N = 201 and N = 248), where separatist movements are actively striving for secession from the Republic of Indonesia. As expected, identity threat increased perceptions of injustice in both studies, whereas power threat increased the need for subgroup empowerment. Perceived injustice and need for subgroup empowerment, in turn, decreased support for reconciliation with the majority. The current research is the first to examine how identity and power motives combine in predicting separatist intentions. The studies reveal important insights that can contribute to the reconciliation of separatist conflict.

摘要

当前的研究考察了导致分离主义团体渴望脱离非分离主义多数群体的两个基本动机

维护自身亚群体认同的需要和相对于多数群体维护权力的需要。这两个动机在两项研究中通过对西巴布亚的土著人群体样本(N=201 和 N=248)进行调查得到了检验,在那里,分离运动正在积极争取从印度尼西亚共和国分裂出去。正如预期的那样,在两项研究中,身份威胁都增加了对不公正的感知,而权力威胁增加了对亚群体赋权的需求。反过来,感知到的不公正和对亚群体赋权的需求又降低了对与多数群体和解的支持。本研究首次考察了身份和权力动机如何结合起来预测分离主义意图。这些研究揭示了重要的见解,可以为解决分离主义冲突做出贡献。

相似文献

1
Predicting Support for Reconciliation in Separatist Conflict.预测分离主义冲突中的和解支持。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Feb;44(2):173-185. doi: 10.1177/0146167217733076. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
2
Remember your crimes: How an appeal to ingroup wrongdoings fosters reconciliation in separatist conflict.记住你的罪行:在分离主义冲突中,呼吁团体内部的错误行为如何促进和解。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2018 Oct;57(4):815-833. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12261. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
3
Intergroup helping in response to separatism.群体间对分裂主义的帮助。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Dec;39(12):1647-55. doi: 10.1177/0146167213499613. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
4
With or without you? Perceived indispensability and opposition to separatist movements.有你或没有你?对分裂运动的感知不可或缺性和反对。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Apr;62(2):655-672. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12624. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
5
Loyal deviance: testing the normative conflict model of dissent in social groups.忠诚的偏差:检验群体异议的规范冲突模型。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Jan;36(1):5-18. doi: 10.1177/0146167209350628. Epub 2009 Nov 11.
6
Intergroup Leadership Across Distinct Subgroups and Identities.跨不同亚群体和身份的群体领导。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Jul;44(7):1090-1103. doi: 10.1177/0146167218757466. Epub 2018 Mar 11.
7
Energizing and de-motivating effects of norm-conflict.规范冲突的激励和去激励效应。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Jan;39(1):57-72. doi: 10.1177/0146167212464234. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
8
Motivation and social contexts: a crossnational pilot study of achievement, power, and affiliation motives.动机与社会环境:跨国成就、权力和亲和动机试点研究。
Int J Psychol. 2012;47(2):111-7. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2011.590493. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
9
Different groups, different motives: identity motives underlying changes in identification with novel groups.不同群体,不同动机:认同新群体背后的认同动机变化。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Aug;38(8):1066-80. doi: 10.1177/0146167212444614. Epub 2012 May 8.
10
When subgroups secede: extending and refining the social psychological model of schism in groups.当子群体分裂时:扩展并完善群体分裂的社会心理模型
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Aug;31(8):1074-86. doi: 10.1177/0146167204274092.

引用本文的文献

1
Humility and Competence: Which Attribute Affects Social Relationships at Work?谦逊与能力:哪个特质更能影响职场社交关系?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 14;19(10):5969. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19105969.