Suppr超能文献

非洲侵袭牛的家畜蜱对杀螨剂的抗性:现状与潜在缓解策略

Acaricide resistance in livestock ticks infesting cattle in Africa: Current status and potential mitigation strategies.

作者信息

Githaka Naftaly W, Kanduma Esther G, Wieland Barbara, Darghouth Mohamed A, Bishop Richard P

机构信息

International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), P.O. Box 30709-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.

Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 30197-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.

出版信息

Curr Res Parasitol Vector Borne Dis. 2022 May 14;2:100090. doi: 10.1016/j.crpvbd.2022.100090. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

In many African countries, tick control has recently been the responsibility of resource-poor farmers rather than central government veterinary departments. This has led to an increase in acaricide resistance, threatening the welfare of livestock farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. Resistance has evolved to the three classes of acaricides used most extensively in the continent, namely fourth-generation synthetic pyrethroids (SP), organophosphates (OP) and amidines (AM), in virtually all countries in which they have been deployed across the globe. Most current data are derived from research in Australia and Latin America, with the majority of studies on acaricide resistance in Africa performed in South Africa. There is also limited recent research from West Africa and Uganda. These studies confirm that acaricide resistance in cattle ticks is a major problem in Africa. Resistance is most frequently directly assayed in ticks using the larval packet test (LPT) that is endorsed by FAO, but such tests require a specialist tick-rearing laboratory and are relatively time consuming. To date they have only been used on a limited scale in Africa and resistance is often still inferred from tick numbers on animals. Rapid tests for resistance in ticks, would be better than the LPT and are theoretically possible to develop. However, these are not yet available. Resistance can be mitigated through integrated control strategies, comprising a combination of methods, including acaricide class rotation or co-formulations, ethnoveterinary practices, vaccination against ticks and modified land management use by cattle, with the goal of minimising the number of acaricide applications required per year. There are data suggesting that small-scale farmers in Africa are often unaware of the chemical differences between different acaricide brands and use these products at concentrations other than those recommended by the manufacturers, or in incorrect rotations or combinations of the different classes of chemicals on the market. There is an urgent need for a more evidence-based approach to acaricide usage in small-scale livestock systems in Africa, including direct measurements of resistance levels, combined with better education of farmers regarding acaricide products and how they should be deployed for control of livestock ticks.

摘要

在许多非洲国家,蜱虫控制工作近来一直由资源匮乏的农民负责,而非中央政府的兽医部门。这导致杀螨剂抗性增加,威胁到撒哈拉以南非洲地区畜牧农民的福祉。在该大陆广泛使用的三类杀螨剂,即第四代合成拟除虫菊酯(SP)、有机磷(OP)和脒类(AM),在全球所有使用它们的国家,抗性几乎都已出现。当前的大多数数据源自澳大利亚和拉丁美洲的研究,而非洲关于杀螨剂抗性的研究大多在南非进行。西非和乌干达近期的研究也很有限。这些研究证实,牛蜱的杀螨剂抗性是非洲的一个主要问题。抗性最常通过粮农组织认可的幼虫分组试验(LPT)在蜱虫中直接测定,但此类试验需要专门的蜱虫饲养实验室,且相对耗时。迄今为止,它们在非洲的使用规模有限,抗性通常仍通过动物身上的蜱虫数量来推断。用于蜱虫抗性的快速检测方法会比幼虫分组试验更好,并且理论上是可以开发出来的。然而,目前尚未有此类检测方法。可以通过综合控制策略来减轻抗性,这些策略包括多种方法的组合,如杀螨剂类别轮换或混剂、民族兽医学方法、蜱虫疫苗接种以及改进牛群的土地管理利用方式,目标是尽量减少每年所需的杀螨剂使用次数。有数据表明,非洲的小农户往往不了解不同杀螨剂品牌之间的化学差异,使用这些产品时的浓度并非制造商推荐的浓度,或者在市场上不同类别化学品的轮换或组合方式不正确。非洲小规模畜牧系统迫切需要一种更基于证据的杀螨剂使用方法,包括直接测量抗性水平,同时更好地对农民进行关于杀螨剂产品以及如何使用它们来控制家畜蜱虫的教育。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93b3/9160480/ff4f3b482ba2/ga1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验