Garry David, Newton Jim, Colebourn Claire
Department of Anaesthetics, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK.
Department of Cardiology, OUH NHS Trust, Oxford, UK.
J Intensive Care Soc. 2016 Feb;17(1):51-62. doi: 10.1177/1751143715595641. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
Systolic impairment is well reported in critically ill patients but diastolic function has been relatively understudied. The objective of this review was to assess tissue Doppler indices of diastolic function in critically ill patients along with any association with mortality.
A systematic review of articles in English using Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane database of systematic reviews. Search terms included diastolic function, diastolic dysfunction, diastolic abnormal*, diastolic heart failure, diastolic filling, ventricular relaxation, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, left ventricular filling pressure, cardiac dysfunction, intensive care, critical care, critically ill, critical illness, sepsis and septic shock. Only studies of critically ill adult patients (excluding post-cardiac surgical patients) whose diastolic function was assessed using tissue Doppler imaging were included. Study quality was assessed using a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).
Nineteen studies were included, with a total of 1365 patients. All trials were observational. There was a large heterogeneity in patient populations and the methodology of tissue Doppler assessment of diastology resulting in a descriptive analysis. Patient groups included severe sepsis or septic shock (5 studies), septic shock (5 studies), systemic inflammatory response syndrome and shock (1 study), septic shock and acute lung injury (1 study), cancer and septic shock (2 studies), general ICU patients (1 study), combined medical and surgical ICU (2 studies) and sub-arachnoid haemorrhage patients (2 studies). Seventeen studies scored 5/6 on the NOS with the remaining two scoring 4/6. Fourteen studies reported on numbers of patients diagnosed with diastolic dysfunction (500/999, mean 50%, range 20-92%). Three studies found that diastolic dysfunction was an independent predictor of mortality.
Current data shows a large range in the incidence of diastolic dysfunction in this patient population and a variable link with mortality. Future research should focus on the definition of normal values for diastolic function in critically ill patients along with the effects of ICU therapies and consensus criteria for its assessment in this patient population.
在危重症患者中,收缩功能损害已有充分报道,但舒张功能相对研究较少。本综述的目的是评估危重症患者舒张功能的组织多普勒指标及其与死亡率的任何关联。
使用Medline、EMBASE、CINAHL和Cochrane系统评价数据库对英文文章进行系统综述。检索词包括舒张功能、舒张功能障碍、舒张异常*、舒张性心力衰竭、舒张期充盈、心室舒张、肺动脉闭塞压、左心室充盈压、心功能不全、重症监护、危重症护理、危重症患者、危重病、脓毒症和感染性休克。仅纳入使用组织多普勒成像评估舒张功能的成年危重症患者(不包括心脏手术后患者)的研究。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)修订版评估研究质量。
纳入19项研究,共1365例患者。所有试验均为观察性研究。患者人群和舒张功能组织多普勒评估方法存在很大异质性,因此进行描述性分析。患者组包括严重脓毒症或感染性休克(5项研究)、感染性休克(5项研究)、全身炎症反应综合征和休克(1项研究)、感染性休克和急性肺损伤(1项研究)、癌症和感染性休克(2项研究)、普通重症监护病房患者(1项研究)、内科和外科重症监护病房联合患者(2项研究)和蛛网膜下腔出血患者(2项研究)。17项研究在NOS上得分为5/6,其余两项得分为4/6。14项研究报告了诊断为舒张功能障碍的患者数量(500/999,平均50%,范围2-92%)。3项研究发现舒张功能障碍是死亡率的独立预测因素。
目前数据显示该患者人群中舒张功能障碍的发生率差异很大,与死亡率的关联也各不相同。未来研究应聚焦于危重症患者舒张功能正常值的定义,以及重症监护病房治疗的影响和该患者人群舒张功能评估的共识标准。