• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

组织多普勒评估舒张功能与危重症脓毒症患者死亡率的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Tissue Doppler assessment of diastolic function and relationship with mortality in critically ill septic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS-ISMETT (Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione), Via Tricomi 5, 90127 Palermo, Italy.

Department of Cardiovascular Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Toronto General Hospital, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2017 Oct 1;119(4):583-594. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex254.

DOI:10.1093/bja/aex254
PMID:29121301
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Myocardial dysfunction may contribute to circulatory failure in sepsis. There is growing evidence of an association between left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) and mortality in septic patients. Utilizing echocardiography, we know that tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) variables e' and E/e' are reliable predictors of LVDD and are useful measurements to estimate left ventricular (LV) filling pressures.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the association of e' and E/e' with mortality of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. In the primary analysis, we included studies providing transthoracic TDI data for e' and E/e' and their association with mortality. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to myocardial regional focus of TDI assessment (septal, lateral or averaged). Three secondary analyses were performed: one included data from a transoesophageal study, another excluded studies reporting data at a very early (<6 h) or late (>48 h) stage following diagnosis, and the third pooled data only from studies excluding patients with heart valve disease.

RESULTS

The primary analysis included 16 studies with 1507 patients with severe sepsis and/or septic shock. A significant association was found between mortality and both lower e' [standard mean difference (SMD) 0.33; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.05, 0.62; P=0.02] and higher E/e' (SMD -0.33; 95% CI: -0.57, -0.10; P=0.006). In the subgroup analyses, only the lateral TDI values showed significant association with mortality (lower e' SMD 0.45; 95% CI: 0.11, 0.78; P=0.009; higher E/e' SMD -0.49; 95% CI: -0.76, -0.22; P=0.0003). The findings of the primary analysis were confirmed by all secondary analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a strong association between both lower e' and higher E/e' and mortality in septic patients.

摘要

背景

心肌功能障碍可能导致脓毒症患者循环衰竭。越来越多的证据表明,左心室舒张功能障碍(LVDD)与脓毒症患者的死亡率之间存在关联。利用超声心动图,我们知道组织多普勒成像(TDI)变量 e' 和 E/e' 是 LVDD 的可靠预测指标,也是评估左心室(LV)充盈压的有用测量指标。

方法

我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以调查 e' 和 E/e' 与严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者死亡率的关系。在主要分析中,我们纳入了提供经胸 TDI 数据的研究,用于评估 e' 和 E/e' 及其与死亡率的关系。根据 TDI 评估的心肌区域焦点(间隔、侧壁或平均)进行亚组分析。进行了三次次要分析:一次包括经食管研究的数据,另一次排除了报告诊断后非常早期(<6 小时)或晚期(>48 小时)阶段数据的研究,第三次仅汇总排除了心脏瓣膜病患者的研究数据。

结果

主要分析纳入了 16 项研究,共 1507 例严重脓毒症和/或脓毒性休克患者。死亡率与 e' 降低[标准均数差(SMD)0.33;95%置信区间(CI):0.05,0.62;P=0.02]和 E/e' 升高[SMD -0.33;95% CI:-0.57,-0.10;P=0.006]均存在显著相关性。在亚组分析中,只有侧壁 TDI 值与死亡率存在显著相关性(e' 降低 SMD 0.45;95% CI:0.11,0.78;P=0.009;E/e' 升高 SMD -0.49;95% CI:-0.76,-0.22;P=0.0003)。所有次要分析均证实了主要分析的结果。

结论

脓毒症患者的 e' 降低和 E/e' 升高与死亡率之间存在很强的关联。

相似文献

1
Tissue Doppler assessment of diastolic function and relationship with mortality in critically ill septic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.组织多普勒评估舒张功能与危重症脓毒症患者死亡率的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Anaesth. 2017 Oct 1;119(4):583-594. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex254.
2
Detecting impaired myocardial relaxation in sepsis with a novel tissue Doppler parameter (septal e'/s').用一种新的组织多普勒参数(间隔侧 e'/s')检测脓毒症心肌舒张功能障碍。
Crit Care. 2017 Jul 14;21(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1727-9.
3
Diastolic dysfunction and mortality in septic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.脓毒症患者舒张功能障碍与死亡率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2015 Jun;41(6):1004-13. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3748-7. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
4
Improvement of left ventricular relaxation as assessed by tissue Doppler imaging in fluid-responsive critically ill septic patients.组织多普勒成像评估液体反应性危重症脓毒症患者左心室舒张功能的改善。
Intensive Care Med. 2012 Sep;38(9):1461-70. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2618-9. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
5
Impact of New-Onset Left Ventricular Dysfunction on Outcomes in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock.机械通气严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者新发左心室功能障碍对结局的影响。
J Intensive Care Med. 2018 Dec;33(12):680-686. doi: 10.1177/0885066616684774. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
6
Prognostic Significance of Diastolic Dysfunction in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients With Sepsis and Septic Shock: Insights From a Longitudinal Tertiary Care Study.2型糖尿病合并脓毒症和感染性休克患者舒张功能障碍的预后意义:一项纵向三级医疗研究的见解
Cureus. 2023 Sep 25;15(9):e45894. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45894. eCollection 2023 Sep.
7
Left Ventricle Tissue Doppler Imaging Predicts Disease Severity in Septic Patients Newly Admitted in an Emergency Unit.左心室组织多普勒成像可预测急诊新入院脓毒症患者的疾病严重程度。
J Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;49(6):907-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.06.054. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
8
Tissue Doppler-derived E/e' ratio as a parameter for assessing diastolic heart failure and as a predictor of mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease.组织多普勒衍生的 E/e' 比值作为评估舒张性心力衰竭的参数,并作为慢性肾脏病患者死亡率的预测指标。
Korean J Intern Med. 2013 Jan;28(1):35-44. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2013.28.1.35. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
9
Tissue Doppler imaging in patients with advanced heart failure: relation to functional class and prognosis.晚期心力衰竭患者的组织多普勒成像:与心功能分级及预后的关系
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006 Feb;25(2):214-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2005.09.002.
10
Factors associated with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with septic shock.与感染性休克患者左心室舒张功能障碍相关的因素。
Eur J Med Res. 2022 Jul 27;27(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s40001-022-00761-5.

引用本文的文献

1
5-Hydroxymethylcytosine signatures as diagnostic biomarkers for septic cardiomyopathy.5-羟甲基胞嘧啶特征作为脓毒症性心肌病的诊断生物标志物
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 4;15(1):23987. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02489-8.
2
Pathogenesis and treatment strategies of sepsis-induced myocardial injury: modern and traditional medical perspectives.脓毒症诱导的心肌损伤的发病机制及治疗策略:现代医学与传统医学视角
Int J Biol Sci. 2025 May 15;21(8):3478-3504. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.111288. eCollection 2025.
3
Septic Cardiomyopathy: Difficult Definition, Challenging Diagnosis, Unclear Treatment.
脓毒症性心肌病:定义困难、诊断棘手、治疗不明
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 4;14(3):986. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030986.
4
Levosimendan for sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction: friend or foe?左西孟旦治疗脓毒症诱发的心肌功能障碍:是福是祸?
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jan 8;11:1520596. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1520596. eCollection 2024.
5
Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is prevalent but not associated with mortality in patients with septic shock.左心室舒张功能障碍在感染性休克患者中普遍存在,但与死亡率无关。
Intensive Care Med. 2025 Jan;51(1):94-105. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07748-2. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
6
Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in the Critically Ill: The Rubik's Cube of Echocardiography.危重症患者的左心室舒张功能障碍:超声心动图的魔方难题
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Sep;28(9):813-815. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24801. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
7
Septic Cardiomyopathy.脓毒症性心肌病
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jan 15;25(1):23. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2501023. eCollection 2024 Jan.
8
Use of Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography in Septic Cardiomyopathy in Critically Ill Children: A Narrative Review.应用斑点追踪超声心动图评估危重症患儿感染性心肌病:一项综述。
Crit Care Explor. 2024 Jun 25;6(7):e1114. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001114. eCollection 2024 Jul 1.
9
NOVEL ECHOCARDIOGRAM ANALYSIS OF CARDIAC DYSFUNCTION IS ASSOCIATED WITH MORTALITY IN PEDIATRIC SEPSIS.新型超声心动图分析在儿童脓毒症心功能不全与死亡率的相关性。
Shock. 2024 Jul 1;62(1):26-31. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000002359. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
10
The effects of an IV fluid bolus on mitral annular velocity and the assessment of diastolic function: a prospective non-randomized study.静脉输液对二尖瓣环速度的影响及舒张功能评估:一项前瞻性非随机研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Mar 26;24(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02503-y.