Suppr超能文献

1年内发作性和慢性偏头痛状态的波动:对诊断、治疗及临床试验设计的意义

Fluctuations in episodic and chronic migraine status over the course of 1 year: implications for diagnosis, treatment and clinical trial design.

作者信息

Serrano Daniel, Lipton Richard B, Scher Ann I, Reed Michael L, Stewart Walter Buzz F, Adams Aubrey Manack, Buse Dawn C

机构信息

Endpoint Outcomes, Boston, MA, USA.

The Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Headache Pain. 2017 Oct 4;18(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s10194-017-0787-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Relatively little is known about the stability of a diagnosis of episodic migraine (EM) or chronic migraine (CM) over time. This study examines natural fluctuations in self-reported headache frequency as well as the stability and variation in migraine type among individuals meeting criteria for EM and CM at baseline.

METHODS

The Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes (CaMEO) Study was a longitudinal survey of US adults with EM and CM identified by a web-questionnaire. A validated questionnaire was used to classify respondents with EM (<15 headache days/month) or CM (≥15 headache days/month) every three months for a total of five assessments. We described longitudinal persistence of baseline EM and CM classifications. In addition, we modelled longitudinal variation in headache day frequency per month using negative binomial repeated measures regression models (NBRMR).

RESULTS

Among the 5464 respondents with EM at baseline providing four or five waves of data, 5048 (92.4%) had EM in all waves and 416 (7.6%) had CM in at least one wave. Among 526 respondents with CM at baseline providing four or five waves of data, 140 (26.6%) had CM in every wave and 386 (73.4%) had EM for at least one wave. Individual plots revealed striking within-person variations in headache days per month. The NBRMR model revealed that the rate of headache days increased across waves of observation 19% more per wave for CM compared to EM (rate ratio [RR], 1.19; 95% CI, 1.13-1.26). After adjustment for covariates, the relative difference changed to a 26% increase per wave (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.2-1.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Follow-up at three-month intervals reveals a high level of short-term variability in headache days per month. As a consequence, many individuals cross the CM diagnostic boundary of ≥15 headache days per month.Nearly three quarters of persons with CM at baseline drop below this diagnostic boundary at least once over the course of a year. These findings are of interest in the consideration of headache classification and diagnosis, the design and interpretation of epidemiologic and clinical studies, and clinical management.

摘要

背景

关于发作性偏头痛(EM)或慢性偏头痛(CM)诊断随时间的稳定性,人们了解相对较少。本研究考察了自我报告的头痛频率的自然波动,以及在基线时符合EM和CM标准的个体中偏头痛类型的稳定性和变异性。

方法

慢性偏头痛流行病学与结局(CaMEO)研究是一项对通过网络问卷识别出的患有EM和CM的美国成年人进行的纵向调查。使用经过验证的问卷,每三个月对受访者进行一次分类,分为EM(每月头痛天数<15天)或CM(每月头痛天数≥15天),共进行五次评估。我们描述了基线EM和CM分类的纵向持续性。此外,我们使用负二项重复测量回归模型(NBRMR)对每月头痛天数的纵向变化进行建模。

结果

在基线时患有EM且提供了四或五轮数据的5464名受访者中,5048名(92.4%)在所有轮次中均为EM,416名(7.6%)在至少一轮次中为CM。在基线时患有CM且提供了四或五轮数据的526名受访者中,140名(26.6%)在每一轮次中均为CM,386名(73.4%)在至少一轮次中为EM。个体图表显示每月头痛天数存在显著的个体内差异。NBRMR模型显示,与EM相比,CM在各轮观察中头痛天数的增加率每轮多19%(率比[RR],1.19;95%置信区间,1.13 - 1.26)。在对协变量进行调整后,相对差异变为每轮增加26%(RR,1.26;95%置信区间,1.2 - 1.33)。

结论

每三个月进行一次随访发现,每月头痛天数存在高水平的短期变异性。因此,许多个体跨越了每月头痛天数≥15天的CM诊断界限。基线时患有CM的人中,近四分之三在一年的过程中至少有一次低于该诊断界限。这些发现对于头痛分类和诊断的考虑、流行病学和临床研究的设计与解释以及临床管理具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e292/5628086/bd7592467216/10194_2017_787_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验