• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用潜在差异 (LD) 建模分析深入了解项目键值效应。

Novel Insights Into Item Keying/Valence Effect Using Latent Difference (LD) Modeling Analysis.

机构信息

a Faculty of Education , University of Macau , China.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 2018 Jul-Aug;100(4):389-397. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1369095. Epub 2017 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1080/00223891.2017.1369095
PMID:28980826
Abstract

Responses to positively and negatively worded items are not always consistent, a behavioral pattern known as the item valence method effect. The current research employed latent difference (LD) modeling (Pohl, Steyer, & Kraus, 2008 ) to help determine explanations of the method effect. Respondents were more likely to reject negative characteristics (measured by negatively worded items) than to accept positive ones (measured by positively worded items), and supplementary analysis showed that this tendency was associated with social desirability response style. Correlations between the method effect and social desirability varied across Big Five personality traits, implying that social desirability cannot be the sole reason behind the phenomenon. Other possible explanations are discussed.

摘要

正向和负向题目的反应并不总是一致的,这种行为模式被称为项目效价方法效应。当前的研究采用潜在差异(LD)建模(Pohl、Steyer 和 Kraus,2008)来帮助确定方法效应的解释。与接受积极特征(通过正向表述项目衡量)相比,受访者更有可能拒绝消极特征(通过负向表述项目衡量),补充分析表明这种趋势与社会期望反应模式有关。方法效应与社会期望之间的相关性因五大人格特质而异,这意味着社会期望不能成为这一现象的唯一原因。还讨论了其他可能的解释。

相似文献

1
Novel Insights Into Item Keying/Valence Effect Using Latent Difference (LD) Modeling Analysis.使用潜在差异 (LD) 建模分析深入了解项目键值效应。
J Pers Assess. 2018 Jul-Aug;100(4):389-397. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1369095. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
2
To Be or Not to Be: Exploring the Nature of Positively and Negatively Keyed Personality Items in High-Stakes Testing.存在还是不存在:探索高风险测试中正向和负向计分人格项目的本质。
J Pers Assess. 2016 Sep-Oct;98(5):480-90. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2016.1170691. Epub 2016 May 6.
3
Symptom-positively and -negatively worded items in two popular self-report inventories of anxiety and depression.两种常见的焦虑和抑郁自评量表中症状的正向和负向表述项目。
Psychol Rep. 1991 Oct;69(2):551-60. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1991.69.2.551.
4
Differences in Multiple-Choice Questions of Opposite Stem Orientations Based on a Novel Item Quality Measure.基于新型项目质量度量的正反题干多选题差异。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Mar;87(2):ajpe8934. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8934. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
5
Implications of Item Keying and Item Valence for the Investigation of Construct Dimensionality.项目编码和项目效价对构念维度研究的影响
Multivariate Behav Res. 2015;50(4):457-69. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2015.1022640.
6
Sex differences, social desirability, masculinity, and the tendency to worry.性别差异、社会期望、男子气概与担忧倾向。
J Genet Psychol. 1991 Sep;152(3):295-301. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1991.9914687.
7
How does item wording affect participants' responses in Likert scale? Evidence from IRT analysis.李克特量表中项目措辞如何影响参与者的回答?来自项目反应理论分析的证据。
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 4;15:1304870. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1304870. eCollection 2024.
8
Exploring the item sets of the Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL) measures using factor analysis.使用因子分析探索恢复生活质量(ReQoL)测量的项目集。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Apr;28(4):1005-1015. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2091-1. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
9
How you ask matters: an experimental investigation of the influence of mood on memory self-perceptions and their relationship with objective memory.
Memory. 2014;22(8):1103-15. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2013.870209. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
10
How Does the Valence of Wording Affect Features of a Scale? The Method Effects in the Undergraduate Learning Burnout Scale.措辞的效价如何影响量表的特征?大学生学习倦怠量表中的方法效应。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 28;11:585179. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.585179. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Confidence in mathematics is confounded by responses to reverse-coded items.对数学的信心因对反向计分项目的回答而受到混淆。
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 24;15:1489054. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1489054. eCollection 2024.
2
Why Do Regular and Reversed Items Load on Separate Factors? Response Difficulty vs. Item Extremity.为什么常规项目和反向项目加载在不同因素上?反应难度与项目极端性。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2023 Dec;83(6):1085-1112. doi: 10.1177/00131644221143972. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
3
Modeling Wording Effects Does Not Help in Recovering Uncontaminated Person Scores: A Systematic Evaluation With Random Intercept Item Factor Analysis.
建模措辞效应无助于恢复未受污染的个人得分:基于随机截距项目因素分析的系统评价
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 2;12:685326. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685326. eCollection 2021.