Iniesta Arandia Nerea, Simeón-Aznar Carmen Pilar, Guillén Del Castillo Alfredo, Colunga Argüelles Dolores, Rubio-Rivas Manuel, Trapiella Martínez Luis, García Hernández Francisco José, Sáez Comet Luis, Egurbide Arberas María Victoria, Ortego-Centeno Norberto, Freire Mayka, Marí Alfonso Begoña, Vargas Hitos José Antonio, Ríos Blanco Juan José, Todolí Parra José Antonio, Rodríguez-Carballeira Monica, Marín Ballvé Adela, Chamorro Fernández Antonio Javier, Pla Salas Xavier, Madroñero Vuelta Ana Belen, Ruiz Muñoz Manuel, Fonollosa Pla Vicent, Espinosa Gerard
Department of Autoimmune Diseases, Institut Clinic de Medicina i Dermatología, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
Systemic Autoimmune Diseases Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017 Sep-Oct;35 Suppl 106(4):98-105. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
To assess the clinical manifestations and prognosis of Spanish patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) according to their immunological profile.
From the Spanish Scleroderma Study Group or RESCLE (Registro de ESCLErodermia as Spanish nomenclature) Registry we selected those patients in which anti-centromere (ACA), anti-topoisomerase I (ATA), and anti-RNA polymerase III (ARA) antibodies had been determined, and a single positivity for each SSc specific antibody was detected. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and survival data were compared according to the serologic status of these antibodies.
Overall, 209 SSc patients were included. In 128 (61%) patients ACA was the only positive antibody, 46 (22%) were only positive for ATA, and 35 (17%) for ARA. Of note, the three groups were mutually exclusive. In univariate analysis, patients with ACA presented more frequently limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc) (p<0.001), whereas diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) was the most frequent subtype in patients with ATA (54%) and ARA (62%) (both p<0.001). Positive patients for ARA showed the highest prevalence of joint involvement (p<0.001) and those from ATA group had a higher prevalence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) (p<0.001). Scleroderma renal crisis was more frequent in the ARA group (p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, ACA were associated with female gender and were protective for dcSSc and ILD. ATA were found to be protective for lcSSc and they were independently associated with interstitial reticular pattern. ARA positivity was independently associated with dcSSc. We did not find differences in mortality between the three groups.
In Spanish SSc patients, the presence of SSc specific antibodies conferred a distinctive clinical profile.
根据免疫谱评估西班牙系统性硬化症(SSc)患者的临床表现和预后。
从西班牙硬皮病研究组或RESCLE(西班牙命名法的硬皮病登记处)登记册中,我们选择了那些已检测抗着丝点抗体(ACA)、抗拓扑异构酶I抗体(ATA)和抗RNA聚合酶III抗体(ARA),且每种SSc特异性抗体仅呈单一阳性的患者。根据这些抗体的血清学状态比较人口统计学、临床、实验室和生存数据。
总体而言,纳入了209例SSc患者。128例(61%)患者ACA是唯一阳性抗体,46例(22%)仅ATA呈阳性,35例(17%)ARA呈阳性。值得注意的是,这三组相互排斥。在单变量分析中,ACA阳性的患者更常出现局限性皮肤型SSc(lcSSc)(p<0.001),而弥漫性皮肤型SSc(dcSSc)是ATA阳性患者(54%)和ARA阳性患者(62%)中最常见的亚型(p均<0.001)。ARA阳性患者关节受累的患病率最高(p<0.001),ATA组患者间质性肺病(ILD)的患病率更高(p<0.001)。硬皮病肾危象在ARA组更常见(p<0.001)。在多变量分析中,ACA与女性性别相关,对dcSSc和ILD有保护作用。ATA对lcSSc有保护作用,且与间质网状模式独立相关。ARA阳性与dcSSc独立相关。我们未发现三组之间在死亡率上存在差异。
在西班牙SSc患者中,SSc特异性抗体的存在赋予了独特的临床特征。