Hernández Felipe A, Sayler Katherine A, Bounds Courtney, Milleson Michael P, Carr Amanda N, Wisely Samantha M
1 School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Florida, 103 Black Hall, PO Box 116455, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA.
2 Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, 110 Newins-Ziegler Hall, PO Box 110430, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA.
J Wildl Dis. 2018 Jan;54(1):45-53. doi: 10.7589/2017-04-071. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
: Feral swine ( Sus scrofa) are a pathogen reservoir for pseudorabies virus (PrV). The virus can be fatal to wildlife and contributes to economic losses in the swine industry worldwide. National surveillance efforts in the US use serology to detect PrV-specific antibodies in feral swine populations, but PrV exposure is not a direct indicator of pathogen transmission among conspecifics or to non-suid wildlife species. We measured antibody production and the presence of PrV DNA in four tissue types from feral swine populations of Florida, US. We sampled blood, nasal, oral, and genital swabs from 551 individuals at 39 sites during 2014-16. Of the animals tested for antibody production, 224 of 436 (51%) feral swine were antibody positive while 38 of 549 feral swine (7%) tested for viral shedding were quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-positive for PrV. The detection of PrV DNA across all the collected sample types (blood, nasal, oral, and genital [vaginal] swabs) suggested viral shedding via direct (oronasal or venereal), and potentially indirect (through carcass consumption), routes of transmission among infected and susceptible animals. Fourteen of 212 seronegative feral swine were qPCR-positive, indicating 7% false negatives in the serologic assay. Our findings suggest that serology may underestimate the actual infection risk posed by feral swine to other species and that feral swine populations in Florida are capable of shedding the virus through multiple routes.
野猪(Sus scrofa)是伪狂犬病病毒(PrV)的病原体宿主。该病毒对野生动物可能是致命的,并给全球养猪业造成经济损失。美国的国家监测工作利用血清学检测野猪种群中的PrV特异性抗体,但PrV暴露并非病原体在同种个体之间或向非猪野生动物物种传播的直接指标。我们测量了美国佛罗里达州野猪种群四种组织类型中的抗体产生情况以及PrV DNA的存在情况。在2014 - 2016年期间,我们从39个地点的551只个体采集了血液、鼻腔、口腔和生殖器拭子。在检测抗体产生的动物中,436只野猪中有224只(51%)抗体呈阳性,而在检测病毒 shedding 的549只野猪中,38只(7%)经定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)检测PrV呈阳性。在所有采集的样本类型(血液、鼻腔、口腔和生殖器[阴道]拭子)中检测到PrV DNA,表明病毒通过直接(口鼻或性传播)以及潜在的间接(通过食用尸体)途径在感染和易感动物之间传播。212只血清阴性的野猪中有14只qPCR呈阳性,表明血清学检测中有7% 的假阴性。我们的研究结果表明,血清学可能低估了野猪对其他物种构成的实际感染风险,并且佛罗里达州的野猪种群能够通过多种途径排出病毒。