• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“谁在挑战谁”支持人员培训干预措施对改善针对成年智障人士及挑战性行为的态度和同理心的效果:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案

Effectiveness of the 'Who's Challenging Who' support staff training intervention to improve attitudes and empathy towards adults with intellectual disability and challenging behaviours: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Randell Elizabeth, Hastings Richard P, McNamara Rachel, Knight Roseanna, Gillespie David, Taylor Zachary

机构信息

Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

Centre for Educational Development, Appraisal, and Research (CEDAR) University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2017 Oct 5;18(1):460. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2175-1.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-017-2175-1
PMID:28982380
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5629774/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Findings suggest approximately one in six people with intellectual disability engage in 'challenging behaviours', which include aggression towards others/property and self-injurious actions. In residential settings, actions of staff members can make challenging behaviours more likely to occur, or make these behaviours worse. In particular, negative attitudes from members of staff and lack of understanding about the reasons for challenging behaviour are contributory factors. 'Who's Challenging Who?' (WCW) training is designed to emphasise the role of staff in residential settings as a challenge also to people with intellectual disability. The course is delivered jointly by a trainer with intellectual disability who has been labelled as having challenging behaviour, along with a trainer without intellectual disability.

METHODS

This is a cluster randomised two-arm trial of WCW training versus a waiting list control. Overall, 118 residential settings will be recruited and randomised on a 1:1 ratio. Within each setting, two members of staff will be invited to take part in the trial. Participants will complete assessments at baseline and at 6 and 20 weeks. WCW is a half day initial training course with some follow-on coaching to ensure implementation. The primary outcome is changes in staff empathy towards people with challenging behaviour. Secondary outcomes at the staff level include confidence, attitudes and work-related well-being. Secondary outcomes at the residential setting level include recorded incidents of aggressive challenging behaviour, and use of any restrictive practices.

DISCUSSION

If the results of the cluster randomised trial are positive, we will disseminate the findings widely and make all training manuals and materials freely available for anyone in intellectual disability services (and beyond) to use. Our training approach may have wider implications in other areas of social care. It may also provide a generally applicable model for how to train people with intellectual disability to act as co-trainers in intellectual disability social care settings. People with intellectual disability and challenging behaviour have already been involved centrally with the design, development and pilot evaluation of WCW and will also be fully involved throughout this trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered on the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry on 8th December 2015: ISRCTN53763600 .

摘要

背景

研究结果表明,约六分之一的智障人士存在“挑战性行为”,包括对他人/财产的攻击行为以及自我伤害行为。在住宿机构中,工作人员的行为可能会使挑战性行为更易发生,或使其恶化。特别是,工作人员的消极态度以及对挑战性行为原因缺乏理解是促成因素。“谁在挑战谁?”(WCW)培训旨在强调住宿机构中工作人员的角色,因为这对智障人士来说也是一种挑战。该课程由一名曾被认定有挑战性行为的智障培训师和一名非智障培训师联合授课。

方法

这是一项将WCW培训与等待名单对照进行的整群随机双臂试验。总体而言,将招募118个住宿机构并按1:1比例随机分组。在每个机构中,将邀请两名工作人员参与试验。参与者将在基线、6周和20周时完成评估。WCW是一个为期半天的初始培训课程,并提供一些后续指导以确保实施。主要结果是工作人员对有挑战性行为者的同理心变化。工作人员层面的次要结果包括信心、态度和与工作相关的幸福感。住宿机构层面的次要结果包括记录在案的攻击性行为事件以及任何限制措施的使用情况。

讨论

如果整群随机试验的结果是积极的,我们将广泛传播研究结果,并使所有培训手册和材料可供智障服务领域(及其他领域)的任何人免费使用。我们的培训方法可能在社会护理的其他领域具有更广泛的意义。它还可能为如何培训智障人士在智障社会护理环境中担任联合培训师提供一个普遍适用的模式。有挑战性行为的智障人士已深度参与WCW的设计、开发和试点评估,并且在整个试验过程中也将全面参与。

试验注册

于2015年12月8日在国际标准随机对照试验编号注册库注册:ISRCTN53763600 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/617a/5629774/5d0a098303ef/13063_2017_2175_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/617a/5629774/9bee942d9d2a/13063_2017_2175_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/617a/5629774/5d0a098303ef/13063_2017_2175_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/617a/5629774/9bee942d9d2a/13063_2017_2175_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/617a/5629774/5d0a098303ef/13063_2017_2175_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of the 'Who's Challenging Who' support staff training intervention to improve attitudes and empathy towards adults with intellectual disability and challenging behaviours: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.“谁在挑战谁”支持人员培训干预措施对改善针对成年智障人士及挑战性行为的态度和同理心的效果:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Oct 5;18(1):460. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2175-1.
2
Who's challenging who training for staff empathy towards adults with challenging behaviour: cluster randomised controlled trial.谁在挑战谁——培训员工对具有挑战性行为的成年人的同理心:集群随机对照试验。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2018 Sep;62(9):798-813. doi: 10.1111/jir.12536. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
3
Who's challenging who? Changing attitudes towards those whose behaviour challenges.谁在挑战谁?改变对那些行为具有挑战性的人的态度。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2014 Feb;58(2):99-109. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01630.x. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
4
Is the amount of exposure to aggressive challenging behaviour related to staff work-related well-being in intellectual disability services? Evidence from a clustered research design.在智力障碍服务中,接触攻击性行为的程度是否与员工的工作幸福感有关?来自聚类研究设计的证据。
Res Dev Disabil. 2018 Oct;81:155-161. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.04.006. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
5
Trainer and support staff's experiences of engaging with the Who's Challenging Who? challenging behaviour training course.培训师和支持人员参与“谁在挑战谁?”挑战性行为培训课程的体验。
J Intellect Disabil. 2020 Sep;24(3):367-380. doi: 10.1177/1744629518821789. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
6
Can Healthcare Assistant Training (CHAT) improve the relational care of older people? Study protocol for a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial.医疗保健助理培训(CHAT)能否改善老年人的关系性照护?一项试点整群随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2015 Dec 9;16:559. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1077-3.
7
Nidotherapy compared with enhanced care programme approach training for adults with aggressive challenging behaviour and intellectual disability (NIDABID): cluster-randomised controlled trial.针对有攻击性行为和智力障碍的成年人的巢穴疗法与强化护理计划方法培训的比较(NIDABID):整群随机对照试验
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2017 Jun;61(6):521-531. doi: 10.1111/jir.12360. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
8
Towards a framework in interaction training for staff working with clients with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour.为与智障及具有挑战行为的客户打交道的工作人员建立互动培训框架。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2016 Feb;60(2):134-48. doi: 10.1111/jir.12249. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
9
Attributional styles of support staff working with people with intellectual disabilities exhibiting challenging behaviour.具有挑战性行为的智障人士支持工作人员的归因风格。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2020 May;33(3):465-474. doi: 10.1111/jar.12688. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
10
Clinical and cost effectiveness of staff training in Positive Behaviour Support (PBS) for treating challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disability: a cluster randomised controlled trial.针对智力残疾成年人具有挑战性的行为,开展积极行为支持(PBS)员工培训的临床及成本效益:一项整群随机对照试验
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Aug 3;14:219. doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0219-6.

引用本文的文献

1
An Individual Music Intervention for Adults With Intellectual Disabilities and Challenging Behavior: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.一项针对成年智障及行为障碍者的个体音乐干预:随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Feb 7;13:e52497. doi: 10.2196/52497.

本文引用的文献

1
Challenging behaviours in adults with an intellectual disability: A total population study and exploration of risk indices.成年智障者的挑战性行为:一项全人群研究及风险指标探索
Br J Clin Psychol. 2017 Mar;56(1):16-32. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12118. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
2
Perceptions of positive contributions and burnout in community developmental disability workers.社区发育障碍工作者对积极贡献和职业倦怠的认知。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2014 Aug;52(4):249-57. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-52.4.249.
3
'He's hard work, but he's worth it'. The experience of caregivers of individuals with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour: a meta-synthesis of qualitative research.
“他很难照料,但他值得。”智障及行为障碍者照料者的经历:一项定性研究的元整合分析
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014 Sep;27(5):401-19. doi: 10.1111/jar.12073. Epub 2013 Sep 15.
4
Who's challenging who? Changing attitudes towards those whose behaviour challenges.谁在挑战谁?改变对那些行为具有挑战性的人的态度。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2014 Feb;58(2):99-109. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01630.x. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
5
The Behavior Problems Inventory-Short Form for individuals with intellectual disabilities: part II: reliability and validity.《智障人士行为问题清单-简表》第二部分:信度和效度。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2012 May;56(5):546-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01506.x. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
6
The Behavior Problems Inventory-Short Form for individuals with intellectual disabilities: part I: development and provisional clinical reference data.《智障人士行为问题清单-简表》:第一部分:编制及临时临床参考数据。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2012 May;56(5):527-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01507.x. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
7
Balance algorithm for cluster randomized trials.整群随机试验的平衡算法
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Oct 9;8:65. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-65.
8
Training staff serving clients with intellectual disabilities: a meta-analysis of aspects determining effectiveness.培训为智障客户服务的员工:对决定有效性的因素的元分析
Res Dev Disabil. 2009 May-Jun;30(3):503-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2008.07.011. Epub 2008 Sep 21.
9
Prevalence of, and factors associated with, problem behaviors in adults with intellectual disabilities.成年智力残疾者问题行为的患病率及相关因素。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2008 Sep;196(9):678-86. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e318183f85c.
10
Interactive training for active support: perspectives from staff.
J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2008 Sep;33(3):225-38. doi: 10.1080/13668250802283348.